Page 404 of 427 FirstFirst ... 304354394402403404405406414 ... LastLast
Results 4,031 to 4,040 of 4269

Thread: EV general discussion

  1. #4031
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    5,457
    Total Downloaded
    0
    This article is a bit of a rehash, but lots of links to the research.

    I maintain my position that focussing on EV battery lifespans is misguided. EV batteries are not your mobile phone batteries. Technology has moved on from the Nissan Leaf. Yes there will be occasional failures, but the most likely outcome is the battery will last the life of the car. It should be noted that the classes of cars where there is an electric offering are not series landrovers and are not expected to last for an operator lifetime.


    Study found that we may have been wrong about EV batteries and they'll actually last 40 percent longer
    https://supercarblondie.com/stanford...8Hkz5rtxe9Uk8A
     2005 Defender 110 

  2. #4032
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    5,457
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Further.. if you are not buying an EV because of concerns about battery longevity.. I really think this is nuts. We can all know of several legacy manufacturers where they have sold a car that had a fundamental design issue that results in people having to spend a motza on them. And there seems to be zero concern about that.

    Has anyone got a spare puma motor? Or a TD2.7 v6 for my disco? And so many more...

    I would hate to add it up, but I reckon I spend enough on maintenance on my defender to pay for a complete battery swap every less than ten years. Insane. If I didn't need it for it's purpose would be gone quicker than...
     2005 Defender 110 

  3. #4033
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    5,457
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I see this thread this morning. I wish the OP all the best!

    13 year old D4 with 160k. Engine bang. LR want 40k. Lucky the aftermarket can come to the party. A few posts down "Unfortunately it's a known issue".

    For the life of me I don't see why anyone isn't outraged about this instead of being fixated on what might happen to an EV.

    D4 3.0 SDV6 catastrophic failure

    EDIT: I see the car was only 8 at the time and it's a thread full of the same issue. Go on.. send the fire hose of outrage at LR!
     2005 Defender 110 

  4. #4034
    NavyDiver's Avatar
    NavyDiver is offline Very Very Lucky! Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    10,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DoubleChevron View Post
    The downfall of hydrogen isn't the cars, its the power required to create it and the enormous difficulty of transport and storage. If they manage to store it as a powder that could be very interesting

    Australia's Revolutionary Hydrogen Powder Is Easier and Cheaper to Use for Clean Energy

    but you still need to create the hydrogen in the first place (energy intensive).
    Unless you're an amazing Australian Hydrogen Pyrolysis company with a demonstration plant near Woodman's point, Battery grade graphite and more

    NOT waiting for a Hydrogen car myself - I had deluded myself year ago. I think I had a greenwashing thread somewhere. Twiggy and others blew billions on a known energy intensive hydrogen electrolysis which is dead now.

    Happily methane pyrolysis technologies for hydrogen/graphite production is NOT energy intensive. that Doesn't make it great for cars still!

    NOT INVESTMENT ADVICE


  5. #4035
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Ballarat,Vic,Aus
    Posts
    3,855
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Captain_Rightfoot View Post
    This article is a bit of a rehash, but lots of links to the research.

    I maintain my position that focussing on EV battery lifespans is misguided. EV batteries are not your mobile phone batteries. Technology has moved on from the Nissan Leaf. Yes there will be occasional failures, but the most likely outcome is the battery will last the life of the car. It should be noted that the classes of cars where there is an electric offering are not series landrovers and are not expected to last for an operator lifetime.




    https://supercarblondie.com/stanford...8Hkz5rtxe9Uk8A
    We will see. They are talking about some new sodium battery. Of which there is no details included. Just a wishy, washy "this is fanstastic... we are amazing" type article with absolutely no details.

    But hey, if it makes you think your current throw-away will last some miraculous number of years, by all means, feel free to believe it. Reality will always over-ride blind belief ... always ... without fail sadly.

    seeya
    Shane L.
    Proper cars--
    '92 Range Rover 3.8V8 ... 5spd manual
    '85 Series II CX2500 GTi Turbo I :burnrubber:
    '63 ID19 x 2 :wheelchair:
    '72 DS21 ie 5spd pallas
    Modern Junk:
    '07 Poogoe 407 HDi 6spd manual :zzz:
    '11 Poogoe RCZ HDI 6spd manual

  6. #4036
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Ballarat,Vic,Aus
    Posts
    3,855
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Captain_Rightfoot View Post
    I see this thread this morning. I wish the OP all the best!

    13 year old D4 with 160k. Engine bang. LR want 40k. Lucky the aftermarket can come to the party. A few posts down "Unfortunately it's a known issue".

    For the life of me I don't see why anyone isn't outraged about this instead of being fixated on what might happen to an EV.

    D4 3.0 SDV6 catastrophic failure

    EDIT: I see the car was only 8 at the time and it's a thread full of the same issue. Go on.. send the fire hose of outrage at LR!
    I fail to see what one type of poorly designed ICE engien has to do with an entirely new type of vehicle with fundamental (currently impossible to fix) longetivity issues have in common.

    Everyone complain about how crappy the old hi-undi excel was .... cheap pieces of crap. Yet I still see the damn things on the roads. They were a sound obsolete type of technology and have lasted well.

    seeya
    Shane L.
    Proper cars--
    '92 Range Rover 3.8V8 ... 5spd manual
    '85 Series II CX2500 GTi Turbo I :burnrubber:
    '63 ID19 x 2 :wheelchair:
    '72 DS21 ie 5spd pallas
    Modern Junk:
    '07 Poogoe 407 HDi 6spd manual :zzz:
    '11 Poogoe RCZ HDI 6spd manual

  7. #4037
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    5,457
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DoubleChevron View Post
    I fail to see what one type of poorly designed ICE engien has to do with an entirely new type of vehicle with fundamental (currently impossible to fix) longetivity issues have in common.

    Everyone complain about how crappy the old hi-undi excel was .... cheap pieces of crap. Yet I still see the damn things on the roads. They were a sound obsolete type of technology and have lasted well.

    seeya
    Shane L.
    Well it's just that you're saying "I think EV's won't last long.. they will be throwaways"

    Meanwhile LR are pumping out cars that are also throwaways.. yet that's ok. I find that quite confusing.

    FYI The first teslas that arrived in Australia seem to be lasting quite well. Better than the LR's of the same time. I think the ones being sold now will last better as they have made progress with all sorts of stuff.
     2005 Defender 110 

  8. #4038
    austastar's Avatar
    austastar is offline YarnMaster Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Hobart
    Posts
    3,532
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi,
    My 1950s Hillman Minx came with an owner's manual showing the jacking points and measured distances to straighten the body after a bingle.
    It was still going strong when we sold it in 1977.
    Cheers

  9. #4039
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Ballarat,Vic,Aus
    Posts
    3,855
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Captain_Rightfoot View Post
    Well it's just that you're saying "I think EV's won't last long.. they will be throwaways"

    Meanwhile LR are pumping out cars that are also throwaways.. yet that's ok. I find that quite confusing.

    FYI The first teslas that arrived in Australia seem to be lasting quite well. Better than the LR's of the same time. I think the ones being sold now will last better as they have made progress with all sorts of stuff.
    You just being ridiculous, just buy a different car if you want reliablity. How do you get reliability over the long term buying *any* EV.... the answer is you don't. The youngest car in this house hold is 14 years old... The oldest 75 years old. Guess how much drama I have worrying about $20,000+ battery replacements every 8'ish years (yes, I know ... THEY WILL LAST 25 YEARS ... sure .... ) .... No, hang on .... I've was just told in today in this thread they will even last 40% longer than that This is just so hilarious.
    Proper cars--
    '92 Range Rover 3.8V8 ... 5spd manual
    '85 Series II CX2500 GTi Turbo I :burnrubber:
    '63 ID19 x 2 :wheelchair:
    '72 DS21 ie 5spd pallas
    Modern Junk:
    '07 Poogoe 407 HDi 6spd manual :zzz:
    '11 Poogoe RCZ HDI 6spd manual

  10. #4040
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Avoca Beach
    Posts
    14,150
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Everyone complain about how crappy the old hi-undi excel was .... cheap pieces of crap
    The mechanics on these were all Mitsubishi, even though the Koreans hate the Japanese and they hid all mention of Japanese components. Hyundai made a wagon called a "Galloper" which was an old solid axle Pajero but no Korean I talked to knew it was Pajero.
    Regards PhilipA

Page 404 of 427 FirstFirst ... 304354394402403404405406414 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!