Thread: EV general discussion

I'm not really intersted in a debate on what type of vehicle is better for the environment. They are all bad in there own way. And I'm a car nutter.... I don't dislike EV's ... But the stupidity around them drives me insane.

I don't think the weight really matters where pollution standard come in. The plastic everywhere is because its cheaper to produce. The main reason for cars being heavier, is they are far, far, far stronger. In an accident a car is eons better than anything made last century. They are all standard to look like generic blobs, as this is the easiest way to meet the pedestrian safety standards. If I look under the nose of the poogoe here made in 2007 .... the massive aluminium cross members and structural components are deeply impressive. The big crash members and structures to spread on offset front hit across the entire body are quite impressive.

The bodies of cars are so strong, my wifes little poogoe 2 door, I can feel it lift a rear wheel wwaaayyyy up into the air as I enter the local supermarket through a deep drain ... (I cross it at an angle so it doesn't beach the car out).

I don't think there has been much improvement in the last decade though. No its concentrating on stupid crap where the car intrudes on the driver. I flatly refuse to own any crapbox that tries to steer or brake the car for me... I don't mean EVs when I say this, I mean any modern crapbox that thinks it knows better than me ... the driver.

seeya
Shane L.

Originally Posted by DoubleChevron

I'm not really intersted in a debate on what type of vehicle is better for the environment. They are all bad in there own way. And I'm a car nutter.... I don't dislike EV's ... But the stupidity around them drives me insane.

I don't think the weight really matters where pollution standard come in. The plastic everywhere is because its cheaper to produce. The main reason for cars being heavier, is they are far, far, far stronger. In an accident a car is eons better than anything made last century. They are all standard to look like generic blobs, as this is the easiest way to meet the pedestrian safety standards. If I look under the nose of the poogoe here made in 2007 .... the massive aluminium cross members and structural components are deeply impressive. The big crash members and structures to spread on offset front hit across the entire body are quite impressive.

The bodies of cars are so strong, my wifes little poogoe 2 door, I can feel it lift a rear wheel wwaaayyyy up into the air as I enter the local supermarket through a deep drain ... (I cross it at an angle so it doesn't beach the car out).

I don't think there has been much improvement in the last decade though. No its concentrating on stupid crap where the car intrudes on the driver. I flatly refuse to own any crapbox that tries to steer or brake the car for me... I don't mean EVs when I say this, I mean any modern crapbox that thinks it knows better than me ... the driver.

seeya
Shane L.

I sort of agree. I love some aspects especially the exceptionally good adaptive cruise control in both high and low traffic and speed situations- It was terrifying get to know and trust it.

For high-stress, repetitive tasks like staying centered in a well-marked lane on a freeway or maintaining a precise follow-distance, the ADAS systems (Lane Keeping and ACC) are often better and more consistent. They reduce fatigue and reaction time.


For navigating complex urban environments, handling poor infrastructure, or responding to unpredictable situations, our driver's judgment and adaptability remain superior.


The best solution is the collaboration: The systems serve as an essential safety net and fatigue reducer, but the human must remain the ultimate decision-maker and supervisor.


My foots always covering the brake and I get to concentrate on steering and watching the situation ahead much better. I think we all may have seen once or twice the impacts on fatigue on driving and anything that helps in that is fine with this black duck

My TD5 has done 180k in 20 years. That's entirely down to it's role as a trip car. If it was a daily as well I'm guessing it would be at least twice that. Given I'd like to keep that car going longer I'm happy with that and I am grateful that we are in a position to have an EV for all the junk family miles.

Frankly the cost of maintenance of the defender is just horrifying. So far in 2.5 years of EV ownership - I've rotated the tyres front to back twice. Also, I spend about $150 on power each year. I've spent literally tens of thousands in operating costs on the defender.

I don't delude myself or hopefully anyone that EV's are "good for the environment". The best we can hope for is "less bad". But as has been noted the best outcome is to drive what you have. But sometimes people need to change car.

If you want true climate friendly transport. Walk, cycle, catch public transport.

Originally Posted by Captain_Rightfoot

My TD5 has done 180k in 20 years. That's entirely down to it's role as a trip car. If it was a daily as well I'm guessing it would be at least twice that. Given I'd like to keep that car going longer I'm happy with that and I am grateful that we are in a position to have an EV for all the junk family miles.

Frankly the cost of maintenance of the defender is just horrifying. So far in 2.5 years of EV ownership - I've rotated the tyres front to back twice. Also, I spend about $150 on power each year. I've spent literally tens of thousands in operating costs on the defender.

I don't delude myself or hopefully anyone that EV's are "good for the environment". The best we can hope for is "less bad". But as has been noted the best outcome is to drive what you have. But sometimes people need to change car.

If you want true climate friendly transport. Walk, cycle, catch public transport.

How is a defender horrifying to upkeep. Given your milage, fuel usage is little... nothing will really wear out. You might service it ever 2 years. It won't rot out exhausts (diesel)... You might need to replace the tires every 8 years and its battery every 5 years..... Your upkeep is effectively "nothing". Much like the limited use cars I have here. The ****box range rover costs me bugger all to upkeep as its not doing any vast milage.

Very confusing. You are comparing a 20year old car to a 2.5 year old car too. One that's not used for any of the heavy duty tasks the other car takes on. Lets see a comparison when the EV hits 20years of age and 180,000kms (which really is barely run in for a vehicle like a defender).

I honestly can't understand what you would have spent money on with the defender.... It'll still probably wear its orignal brake rotors even. Its had probably 18 oil changes, 4 sets of tires and 4 batteries in that time ... and not much else ...

BTW: Your EV has probably depreciated more in 2.5 years than the defender has in 20years .... I wouldn't be suprised if the defender is actually increasing in value.

seeya
Shane L.

Originally Posted by DoubleChevron

How is a defender horrifying to upkeep. Given your milage, fuel usage is little... nothing will really wear out. You might service it ever 2 years. It won't rot out exhausts (diesel)... You might need to replace the tires every 8 years and its battery every 5 years..... Your upkeep is effectively "nothing". Much like the limited use cars I have here. The ****box range rover costs me bugger all to upkeep as its not doing any vast milage.

Very confusing. You are comparing a 20year old car to a 2.5 year old car too. One that's not used for any of the heavy duty tasks the other car takes on. Lets see a comparison when the EV hits 20years of age and 180,000kms (which really is barely run in for a vehicle like a defender).

I honestly can't understand what you would have spent money on with the defender.... It'll still probably wear its orignal brake rotors even. Its had probably 18 oil changes, 4 sets of tires and 4 batteries in that time ... and not much else ...

BTW: Your EV has probably depreciated more in 2.5 years than the defender has in 20years .... I wouldn't be suprised if the defender is actually increasing in value.

seeya
Shane L.

On my last trip we tripped over 185k. So I went back to 170k. Which is three years for me. Depending on trips. Regular maintenance has been 23100. Servicing, tyres, windscreen. All the usual stuff to stay on the road. This included a massive bill for a complete brake renewal, clutch renewal, various suspension bushes that was done just before the last trip. I do some stuff myself and which is mostly consumables which is oil etc which is probably not counted in that.

If you were including upgrades you would have to add another 4500 for replacing all the batteries and dual battery system and tow controller and wiring (batteries were 8 years old), 3400 for Koni Raid. Plus it was a couple of k for ECU and performance upgrades (sports exhaust!!). If you went back another couple of k to 168 you'd have 4k for an ashcroft ATB.

And all this excludes the $2200 for the airconditioning repairs. I've excluded that because that work is not finished because the stupid thing is not really working.

And It's currently at the specialist sorting a monumental fuel leak. "while your there change the pump". I expect that will be another 2k or more as the tank is rusty and might need some repairs. Damn LRA don't put great coatings on. It's got the original starter and alternator.. I'm nervously monitoring.

So we've had a couple of hard years. Lots of repairs that were just because the car is 20 years old.

Once we gave up on the grenadier there has been a few solid upgrades because we intend to keep the car.

If I'm honest I've heard our maintenance described as "premium maintenance". Because we really try to stay on top of it. Anything that even remotely looks to be departing specification is fixed. Because we only use it on trips, we try and make sure it's in 100% shape. Its not helping that parts now seem to have gotten much more expensive. Anyway - we take it out there and it goes like a rocket surrounded by modern cars. One of the NSW Toyota 4wd club trainers we had on our last trip described its performance as "Seriously impressive". We can do stuff in sand that no one else seems to be able to do. The specialist describes it as the best TD5 they see now.

So a friend of mine runs a lotus parts/engineering shop. He said that people who own V8 Esprit should budget 25k a year for maintenance. You won't spend it every year, but some years won't be great. I'm thinking the defender for us is probably a 10k maintenance a year car. Maybe a bit more if we don't have a few good years. Here is hoping.

I take on board that it's probably not depreciating much if at all. But that only helps if you sell it.

So yes, having an EV that so far has cost virtually $0 in maintenance and running has been a relief.

EDIT: in that 15k there has been two trips Brisbane to Birdsville, four desert crossings, and one trip to fraser for a couple of weeks. Probably only 2k in Brisbane.

Ooops.. I forgot 3.2k for gullwing windows which I fitted myself.

Sensational upgrade that. One of the best I've done.

Originally Posted by DoubleChevron

I'm not anti-ev,

Of course you are

The electricity grid is getting greener every day as people install solar panels and so are the batteries....BMW Australia launches EV battery recycling program | CarExpert