It is just a concept.
It is not pre orders. A deposit. Fully refundable at any time.
Euro regs for pedestrian impact require minimum radius of 20mm on edges. Can’t have anything that ends in a point either, so where the headlight meets the bodywork is also a no no. That’s one (not the only) reason they can’t have bullbars like we do here. No way those angles meet these regs. Electric Jesus wouldn’t have though far enough ahead to be meeting any regs, he’s only scamming money out of the gullible to prop up his other hair brained schemes.
If you need to contact me please email homestarrunnerau@gmail.com - thanks - Gav.
I don't think it is a scam - I see it as a way for the company to determine interest in their planned developments. They have done the same sort of thing for previous models, and most notably for their self driving. Just haven't raised eyebrows to the same extent, since they didn't look as outrageous! Nor did musk try to break their windows!
John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
Watch Tesla Cybertruck in tug of war against Ford F150 and size comparison - Electrek
really these comparisons mean nothing, and its a 2WD Ford , but FWIW ....
![]()
Looks like the aerodynamics are good.
If slabs sides and sharp angles were bad the F117 probably would not fly so well.
Are the boxy Tesla Cybertruck's aerodynamics any good? An engineer found out - Electrek
I'm intending to design a wrap to go on ours when / if it finally arrives.
I like the simplicity of its geometric design, a true case of function over form.
Will see what happens, hopefully have mine in a couple of years![]()
Without a lot of computer assistance the F117 can't fly - so that is no advertisement for the aerodynamics of that sort of thing. But having said that, I suspect the aerodynamics are better than the conventional ute seen in that video, if not as good as they could have been.
John
JDNSW
1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks