Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: You bought a Jeep??

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Blair Athol, Adelaide South Aust.
    Posts
    2,745
    Total Downloaded
    0

    You bought a Jeep??


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Free Again Thanks Dan
    Posts
    10,150
    Total Downloaded
    0
    One Life Live It Not

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Yass NSW
    Posts
    5,599
    Total Downloaded
    0
    So Jeep get beaten up for building an old fashioned 4wd that is designed for off road capability and doesn't get a good crash rating and Land Rover get beaten up for discontinuing an old fashioned 4wd that is designed for off road capability and wouldnt achieve even the Jeep's poor crash rating, Just saying........


    Regards,
    Tote
    Go home, your igloo is on fire....
    2014 Chile Red L494 RRS Autobiography Supercharged
    MY2016 Aintree Green Defender 130 Cab Chassis
    1957 Series 1 107 ute - In pieces
    1974 F250 Highboy - Very rusty project

    Assorted Falcons and Jeeps.....

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,770
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    Its a balancing act, you make it hardcore and it wont have all the tech we expect and wont pass a crash test, make it too modern and safe and no one will want it apart from hair dressers.
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    antipodean
    Posts
    4,915
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I've had only Land Rovers for nearly fifty years.
    Wouldn't have anything else.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2017
    Location
    Geraldton WA
    Posts
    8,284
    Total Downloaded
    0
    There is nothing wrong with Jeeps, They have always made a decent off road vehicle.
    FFS even landrover copied their design in the early days
    You only get one shot at life, Aim well

    2004 D2 "S" V8 auto, with a few Mods gone
    2007 79 Series Landcruiser V8 Ute, With a few Mods.
    4.6m Quintrex boat
    20' Jayco Expanda caravan gone

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Knaresborough North Yorkshire UK
    Posts
    1,922
    Total Downloaded
    0
    A big part of the score in an EuroNCAP test is the tech side. That said even allowing for this the results this being a new design it should have been better.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    brighton, brisbane
    Posts
    33,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I’m pretty sure the dinosaurs died out when they stopped gathering food and started having meetings to discuss gathering food

    A bookshop is one of the only pieces of evidence we have that people are still thinking

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    N/A
    Posts
    2,661
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by loanrangie View Post
    Its a balancing act, you make it hardcore and it wont have all the tech we expect and wont pass a crash test, make it too modern and safe and no one will want it apart from hair dressers.
    I don't think that's the case - it's basic structure failed, with significant deformation of the A pillars, roof and footwells. You can put to one side the lack of AEB and pedestrian score if you like but it still leaves a vehicle whose body crumpled in a worrying way - as an example, I would not want to be the driver of that orange one - look where the bumper ended up! The D4 would've done much better on this test than the Jeep and it's just as capable off-road.

    Jeep kind of acknowledged that the Jeep's body isn't sufficiently strong because they're designed to remove the doors and roof - well this is the result. This crash test also illustrates that a ladder chassis, no matter how strong you make it, doesn't provide adequate protection if the body on top of it crumples. So all of those people telling us that, for example, LC200s are safer because they have a ladder chassis are kidding themselves.

    And, to pick up someone else's comment, this is why I didn't buy a current Defender.
    Arapiles
    2014 D4 HSE

  10. #10
    AndyG's Avatar
    AndyG is offline YarnMaster Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    PNG
    Posts
    3,216
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Arapiles View Post
    I don't think that's the case - it's basic structure failed, with significant deformation of the A pillars, roof and footwells. You can put to one side the lack of AEB and pedestrian score if you like but it still leaves a vehicle whose body crumpled in a worrying way - as an example, I would not want to be the driver of that orange one - look where the bumper ended up! The D4 would've done much better on this test than the Jeep and it's just as capable off-road.

    Jeep kind of acknowledged that the Jeep's body isn't sufficiently strong because they're designed to remove the doors and roof - well this is the result. This crash test also illustrates that a ladder chassis, no matter how strong you make it, doesn't provide adequate protection if the body on top of it crumples. So all of those people telling us that, for example, LC200s are safer because they have a ladder chassis are kidding themselves.

    And, to pick up someone else's comment, this is why I didn't buy a current Defender.
    At least in a defender the air bags wont go off randomly You bought a Jeep??
    By all means get a Defender. If you get a good one, you'll be happy. If you get a bad one, you'll become a philosopher.
    apologies to Socrates

    Clancy MY15 110 Defender

    Clancy's gone to Queensland Rovering, and we don't know where he are

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!