Page 2 of 13 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 128

Thread: Landrover to landcruiser

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    You need to do some more research - for their engine size they are actually quite poor. The Landie 2.7 TDV6 actually has more torque - not much in it but it has more - 4.5 litres compared to 2.7 litres.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mick_Marsh View Post
    i would doubt it depending, of course, what year the Landcruiser was manufactured.
    I doubt it conforms to the ADRs and, from how I read the standard, it does not conform to that.
    Awseome input

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    You're not the only one to buy one, although I'm sending most of the superior stuff back, I've got recambered standard springs, no additional leafs, and the lightest coils Lovell's make, with Koni shocks, superior superflex front arms

    Although I need to take to it with angle grinder as tyres foul inner gaurds, also gotta cut up front bar/grill to suit highmount

    Unichip with 3.5" exhaust will do for now, nearly sank mine the other day, lucky I keep them stupid free wheeling hubs locked all the time, dropped into a big hole in a river in 2wd over bonnet height, quick snatch to 4 and made it out luckily.....no matter how much bush work you do, can still make dumb ass mistakes



  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Western Victoria
    Posts
    14,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rovercare View Post
    Awseome input
    So, are you of the opinion it does conform to the ADRs? Are you of the opinion it does conform to the standard?

    If you are, I would really like to know where I have got it wrong.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Brisbane,some of the time.
    Posts
    13,886
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Awesome vehicle,for remote area travel,in my opinion,nothing beats them.

    Now off to hide behind a rock

    Can't wait for the day when i have more time for chasing ferals.....

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mick_Marsh View Post
    So, are you of the opinion it does conform to the ADRs? Are you of the opinion it does conform to the standard?

    If you are, I would really like to know where I have got it wrong.
    I'm of the opinion that its a pointless post

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by scarry View Post
    Awesome vehicle,for remote area travel,in my opinion,nothing beats them.

    Now off to hide behind a rock

    Can't wait for the day when i have more time for chasing ferals.....
    They are a big compromise! My brother had the theory right

    1980's vehicle for 2018 prices

    But, about the closest thing you will get to a dual cab that will head bush well aside from a 130" and the cabs on these are comfortable, 130"s are not, for myself atlest

    I was looking at Iveco's for a while, just a bit on the high side for what I do

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    501
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by scarry View Post
    Awesome vehicle,for remote area travel,in my opinion,nothing beats them.

    Now off to hide behind a rock

    Can't wait for the day when i have more time for chasing ferals.....
    Wouldn't Brisbane be full of ferals this week. They should be hanging off wire fences all around the G20 conference.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Emu Park
    Posts
    1,267
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    You need to do some more research - for their engine size they are actually quite poor. The Landie 2.7 TDV6 actually has more torque - not much in it but it has more - 4.5 litres compared to 2.7 litres.
    Whilst that might be the way on paper, we have the same issue at work we had the V8 cruiser utes and then went to the ford rangers which have 20nm more than the cruisers but its hard to explain the cruisers appear to have more torque really low down grunt when it comes to pull massive shovel cables and so forth.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by nat_89 View Post
    Whilst that might be the way on paper, we have the same issue at work we had the V8 cruiser utes and then went to the ford rangers which have 20nm more than the cruisers but its hard to explain the cruisers appear to have more torque really low down grunt when it comes to pull massive shovel cables and so forth.
    That'll be off idle torque rather than peak torque.
    Off idle torque is basically engine displacement unless you've got a really active small turbo and aggressive antistall.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    43
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    You need to do some more research - for their engine size they are actually quite poor. The Landie 2.7 TDV6 actually has more torque - not much in it but it has more - 4.5 litres compared to 2.7 litres.
    As far as I can tell, from some experience, the Toyota V8 diesel in the 70 series cruisers is tuned very conservatively and it only takes $$$$ to stir them up, and realise their true potential.

    I also understand the Ford 2.7 TDV6 can also be tuned, but as with all tuning of similar technology diesels, you reach a point when displacement takes some beating.

Page 2 of 13 FirstFirst 123412 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!