Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Spotted at Winton Raceway ..

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Hjelm View Post
    I worked on Merlins, early 1960's. Packard Merlin was a term in common use.

    Only minor differences. Some US built engines had US propellor splines, some had British splines. Packard designed ther own supercharger drive. US built engines used US made magnetos and Bendix carburettors. Some Packard superchargers had fewer bolts holding the halves together.

    <snip>
    I did hear that the Mosquito would fly with either British build Merlins or US made ones but with the differences in performance they had difficulty in flying with one of each.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Inner East.
    Posts
    11,178
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    I did hear that the Mosquito would fly with either British build Merlins or US made ones but with the differences in performance they had difficulty in flying with one of each.
    Aero engines usually do a power test. If the engines were the same Mark then performance should be near enough identical other than slight variations due to tolerances, wear, tuning. This is why they had individual throttles. The flight engineer in Lancasters and Halifax 2's had to balance the engines in flight. One never knows what the ground crews did to keep them flying. They could have mixed and matched parts, used worn parts to maintain squadron readiness, etc. etc. We used to build the hydroplane engines up to the equivalent of Mark 63 and later no matter what the Mark the engine started life as. This was done using an accumulation of spare parts. I imagine war-time airstrips would have had plenty of salvage parts.
    URSUSMAJOR

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    52
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Loanrangie, nice pics but............................................... ........







    You need a W I D E R lens!!

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Hjelm View Post
    Aero engines usually do a power test. If the engines were the same Mark then performance should be near enough identical other than slight variations due to tolerances, wear, tuning. This is why they had individual throttles.
    <snip>
    I think the problem was that the Mosquito was such a fast, highly stressed aircraft (made out of plywood) and the types of missions they flew, the differences between the two engines were significant at full revs.

    What the actual problem was, we'd have to find WWII mosquito aircraftsmen or pilots.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Brisbane, Inner East.
    Posts
    11,178
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Diana, on a bare engine without the external accessories, and other than the propellor splines and supercharger bolts on some Packard/Continental built engines, there is no way of telling US built Merlins from UK built Merlins other than dismantling and inspecting the supercharger/accessory drive. Packard used their own planetary drive whilst UK engines used a Farman coupling. Engines that had seen a good bit of service may have had carburettors, magnetos, splines, electricals interchanged so these items are not necessarily a clue to origin.
    URSUSMAJOR

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!