Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Restoration Thread

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Restoration Thread

    I have found an original photo of my dear mother (1911-1985) taken in 1938
    The original size is 5 cm x 3 cm and not in a very good condition.
    First I have done a scan @ 1200 dpi and saved in tiff.
    Second in PS I done the image size and resolution @ 300dpi
    Third I have done the restoration of the fur coat and all skin details.
    I am happy with it and I think that it is not to bad for a 72 years old image.
    What you think?
    By the way post here your restoration work, is fun

    Non restored



    Restored


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,497
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Very good Arthur. Now you need to do the rest! I've spent the last 4 months scanning, restoring and tagging the family's old photos. Hell of a job but worth it. Old pics are priceless.

    I've chosen not to touch up a lot of the old photos and where possible, to leave the picture edge as is...just to keep the "old photo" feel.

    My parent's 1935 V8 Roadster. Purchased in 1957 but later traded for a Morris (!) when my sister came along.


    My grandmother's mother and her brother ~1900 Western NSW.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0
    That two photos have the potential for more restoration work.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,497
    Total Downloaded
    0
    They do....but I like the look. Perhaps I should do both? That's 2 out of some 3000 BTW. I'm a little over the whole thing at the moment.

  5. #5
    miky Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Chucaro View Post
    That two photos have the potential for more restoration work.
    Now that's the thing I feel.

    Is it always "best" to restore to what you think the original looked like, or, leave "as is"?

    I also have have many scanned photos. Some have been retouched but most left as is.

    I agree with fixing dust spots. Many of my scans are from negatives.


    .

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by miky View Post
    Now that's the thing I feel.

    Is it always "best" to restore to what you think the original looked like, or, leave "as is"?

    I also have have many scanned photos. Some have been retouched but most left as is.

    I agree with fixing dust spots. Many of my scans are from negatives.


    .
    The restoration is done before the image be beyond repair, therefore the information lost.
    Remember that in this case, digital restoration of a copy the original is intact.
    The restored copy is a back up

  7. #7
    dmdigital's Avatar
    dmdigital is offline OldBushie Vendor

    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Arnhem Land, NT
    Posts
    8,492
    Total Downloaded
    0
    This is a very old image of my Grandfather. I am told the vehicle was a Daimler. The image is from a scan of the negative and is circa late 1920's. Probably taken in Victoria.

    This was one of my early attempts at photo restoration and was done using PSE 3.0 I'd love to give it another go, but no time at present.
    Negative:


    Edited Positive:
    MY15 Discovery 4 SE SDV6

    Past: 97 D1 Tdi, 03 D2a Td5, 08 Kimberley Kamper, 08 Defender 110 TDCi, 99 Defender 110 300Tdi[/SIZE]

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0
    That is a nice photo

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!