Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Nikon 5100 vs Canon 550D

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Murgon
    Posts
    495
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by slug_burner View Post
    Please note that although you will be able to attach the lens to the camera in the case of the new Nikon body and an old lens, don't expect it to make use of the auto focus or automatic aperture setting that you will get with a modern lens.
    I was about to purchase a D5100 but then did the checks on which of my current Nikkor lenses would work - there are no hard and fast rules on compatibility but it is a point worthy of mention.

    As it happens the D5100 does not have a body autofocus motor so my older Nikkor lenses would not have had AF capability.

    In the end it was easy to justify the extra $ to buy the D7000 - all my old lenses will work with this body. It sure pays to do your research.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bell1975 View Post
    .................................................. ........
    In the end it was easy to justify the extra $ to buy the D7000 - all my old lenses will work with this body. It sure pays to do your research.
    I agree 100%

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,497
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Paul,

    I had a 500D up to a few months ago and found it an excellent camera. My advice for whatever you go with is to buy the body only and put the money saved into a decent lens. The 550D + 24-105 f4 L is a very good combo.

    Cheers,

    Mark

  4. #14
    richard4u2 Guest
    look at the size of the censer , first
    with a canon the I.S. feature is built into the lens which means you can take a RAW photo , other cameras the image stabilizer corrects the photo in the camera as a jpeg photo
    to replace a canon EOS slr film camera with a digital camera you would be looking at paying $3000 up

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by richard4u2 View Post
    look at the size of the censer , first
    with a canon the I.S. feature is built into the lens which means you can take a RAW photo , other cameras the image stabilizer corrects the photo in the camera as a jpeg photo
    to replace a canon EOS slr film camera with a digital camera you would be looking at paying $3000 up
    Not the case in a Nikon body where you get VR lens

    Regarding Replacement for a Canon you can invest well under $ 3000
    A Canon D7 which it is an excelent body cost $ 1300
    Canon EF 50mm f1.4 USM Lenses cost $ 365
    Tokina AT-X 116 Pro DX 11-16mm f2.8 Price: $609.00 AUD
    Sigma 17-50mm F2.8 EX DC OS HSM Price: $602.00 AUD
    They are all good lens.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!