Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 31 to 37 of 37

Thread: Why Buy a Camera?

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Lake Macquarie. NSW.
    Posts
    7,996
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mick_Marsh View Post
    My medium format is a Bronica ETRS. Some years ago I tried to sell it. You'd be surprised how little they are worth. That's why I decided to keep mine and use it occasionally.
    That's why I haven't been in a hurry to sell it. Probably use it as a doorstop..

  2. #32
    p38arover's Avatar
    p38arover is offline Major part of the heart and soul of AULRO.com
    Administrator
    I'm here to help you!
    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    30,704
    Total Downloaded
    1.63 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Hoges View Post
    I had a colleague once who had an "artist's eye" . He had a collection of expensive SLRs and lenses which he sometimes used. His best work was in black & white for which he used a battered 30 yr old Leica. Sadly he died before digital took hold. He sometimes observed to (ignorant) others when they'd have a dig about his old camera that "... good photos form in the mind... the camera simply records it..."
    Zackly! Which is why most of my pics aren't great, I don't have an eye for it.
    Occasionally, I get a good shot.
    Ron B.
    VK2OTC

    2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
    2007 Yamaha XJR1300
    Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA



    RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 4xsama View Post
    Seriously.

    Unless you want to capture a scene like a sunrise or a close up of a critter why would you invest in a $1k camera?

    I don't want to believe in what I am posting but if the beloved & I go camping for a few days and want to record a bit of history why would we invest in some (digi) tech which will be obsolete in 1 year?
    Why it will be obsolete in 1 year?
    My D200 still a good camera and it can use 40 years + old lens and also the new ones.
    To take a good shot you do not need a new camera, good glass is more important and in some cases a long range one if you like avian or other wild life photography.
    Go to a reputable photography equipment gear and get a Nikon D80 for $200 and a Nikon 50mm F1/8 and you will be able to take awesome shots.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 4xsama View Post
    Seriously.

    Unless you want to capture a scene like a sunrise or a close up of a critter why would you invest in a $1k camera?

    I don't want to believe in what I am posting but if the beloved & I go camping for a few days and want to record a bit of history why would we invest in some (digi) tech which will be obsolete in 1 year?
    Why it will be obsolete in 1 year?
    My D200 still a good camera and it can use 40 years + old lens and also the new ones.
    To take a good shot you do not need a new camera, good glass is more important and in some cases a long range one if you like avian or other wild life photography.
    Go to a reputable photography equipment gear and get a Nikon D80 for $200 and a Nikon 50mm F1/8 and you will be able to take awesome shots.
    This image was taken with a D200


  5. #35
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Aus
    Posts
    345
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Because everything is used for a different purpose.

    A DSLR, an SLR, a TLR, a compact, a phone, all do different things.

    If you think you can take the same picture on a phone as a DSLR... Well, good luck to you.

    As for the technology being obsolete... Sorry... I still use cameras from the 50's, and have lenses that span 60 years back. New technology doesn't always mean better. It comes back to certain things doing different things.

  6. #36
    Lightwater Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by p38arover View Post
    Zackly! Which is why most of my pics aren't great,(
    99.99% of photos are not great but that is not the point.



    A Nikon D200 with a 50mm f1.8 is a great setup to get going. A 10mp DSLR is more than adequate for virtually every situation.

    I used a Canon 20D 8mp (still got it) for A3 professional images, and quite a few got blown up to large posters. It would produce similar quality to 645 meduim format. 12mp Canon 5D was better, and about as good as 67 medium format.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Lake Macquarie. NSW.
    Posts
    7,996
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Two of the best cameras, I ever owned were a Nikon FM2 and a Nikon 801s. They were both excellent cameras, easy to use and took great photo's. I gradually upgraded through the years and traded my old camera's in for new ones. Doing professional wedding photography, I wanted to keep up with the latest technology, but that is not necessary for the amateur enthusiast.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!