Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 36

Thread: Any keen photographers?

  1. #1
    DionM Guest

    Any keen photographers?

    Anyone into photography?

    I made the switch from film to digital late last year, I shoot with a Canon EOS20D now. Have a few L lenses, and dedicated macro lens with extension tubes.

    I shoot everything in RAW and then tweak in software.

    Below are a few of my recent experiements (the first few BW ones have noise artificially added to increase the mood).









    And some less sombre photos ...










  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Launceston, Tasmania
    Posts
    12,347
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Love that B&W set Dion, i'd love to expend some film on some derelict buildings. I did some work for the family engineering company a while back in an old site that had been used by the engineering and foundary for about 100 years, but alas it's a car yard now, pity I wasn't into photography then [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif[/img]

    I'd love a nice digital camera, would save me heaps in film and allow me to do some more, but I can;t afford one ...... yet
    1994 Discovery TDi
    2004 Discovery 2 TD5
    2010 Discovery 4 TDV6
    1961, Series 2 Ambulance. 108-098 - Eden

    Registry of Ex Military Land Rovers Mem. 129
    Defence Transport Heritage Tasmania Member

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    7,904
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Nice pictures DionM, but could I make a couple of suggestions for the benefit of those, like me, who are on the dial-up connections.

    First set your picture size to say 600 pixels wide, this will put your picture in the forum column and most people will not need to scroll side wards to see the whole picture.

    Use a program that allows you to do something like “Save To Web” ,
    this will dramatically reduce the down load time but will have very little effect on the quality of the picture.

    Cheers

  4. #4
    DionM Guest
    Originally posted by drivesafe
    Nice pictures DionM, but could I make a couple of suggestions for the benefit of those, like me, who are on the dial-up connections.

    First set your picture size to say 600 pixels wide, this will put your picture in the forum column and most people will not need to scroll side wards to see the whole picture.

    Use a program that allows you to do something like “Save To Web” ,
    this will dramatically reduce the down load time but will have very little effect on the quality of the picture.

    Cheers
    Yeah sorry drivesafe, I tend to forget about dial-up.

    Those shots are set to 700p max width/height. I do compress them to 80% JPEG quality, which is about the trade-off point with quality. Probably the number of images is what choked your dial-up, rather than the size (each is approx 100-150kb, I think).

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    7,904
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi DionM, the same pictures can be reduced to about 40 or 50k and not look any different

    Cheers

  6. #6
    VladTepes's Avatar
    VladTepes is offline Major Part of the Heart and Soul of AULRO Subscriber
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bracken Ridge, Qld
    Posts
    16,055
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Mate I love photography and would LOVE a new camera but will stay with my old Minolta Dynax film SLR until it dies (not too far away I think 8O ) and then get a Canon 350D when I can afford it.

    How can you afford a 20D when you own Land Rovers :?:

    Someone is obviously paying you too much :!: [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif[/img]
    It's not broken. It's "Carbon Neutral".


    gone


    1993 Defender 110 ute "Doris"
    1994 Range Rover Vogue LSE "The Luxo-Barge"
    1994 Defender 130 HCPU "Rolly"
    1996 Discovery 1

    current

    1995 Defender 130 HCPU and Suzuki GSX1400


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    7,904
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi again DionM, have a look at the bottom picture on the G Gauge section where you were before. Thats the pic of the 2 steamers at the platform. That picture is just 28k.

    If you have Photoshop Elements, there is a “Save To Web” command that reduces the file size. That picture was originally around 3mb.

    Cheers.

  8. #8
    DionM Guest
    Originally posted by VladTepes

    Someone is obviously paying you too much :!: [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/tongue.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif[/img]
    Heh. I'm an engineer. We never get paid enough, let alone overpaid :wink:

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane, north of the river
    Posts
    1,924
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I don't mind taking the odd photo. Park of what I like about 4wd'ing, you can get photo's of places that a lot of other people will never see.

    At the moment I have an old Minolta dImage 7i - digital but a couple of years old now.

    I haven't really had the time to spend a great deal learning about how to take photo's, but I've had a few pointers. Such as take them in RAW format (or your camera's equivalent if it is digital) and then edit them using software. I use the Adobe Photoshop Elements as it seems to be best in the marketplace at the moment (and well actually it came with the camera ;-) ).

    Here are a few of what I see as the better photo's taken (out of the hundreds) whilst I've been in Switzerland:

    Xmas 2004 - my wife calls these flowers "Father Xmas's":


    I call this one the home of the Fairies. It's just a light underneath a bush, however with all the snow etc. on top I thought it looked cool:


    A couple of weeks ago my wife and I went on a very very VERY short holiday to Croatia (it's actually quite the tourist spot - nice weather, lovely water, beaches). We were surprised at their "beaches", I'd never seen the like before:


    Lastly, and probably the photo I am the most proud of, is a view from our balcony here in Switzerland. Don't get me wrong not everyone has views like this! Most people live in apartments in the city and their view consists of the next apartment block, however we live outside the city because we needed somewhere for our doggies and this is the type of view you can get on a clear (if overcast) day - and yes I may have tweaked the colours a little but it's still magnificent:


    I made sure to use the "Save to Web" and resized them to no bigger than 600pixels wide functions in Adobe Photoshop Elements for all those pictures, and not one of them is over 60k (average is 45k I think) so I hope I haven't upset anyone on dialup.

    DionW those pictures are beautiful, I wish I had half the eye that you did.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    5,458
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I'm a bit of a photo buff. I have a all Nikon stuff, a F100, FM, and a host of lenses. I tend to keep B&w in the FM, and just colour in the F100.

    I'd switch to digital, but while I've got good film cameras I'll just keep using them.

    My take is that digital is a good thing because it's made photography "cool" and everyone is getting into it.

    However there are a couple of big downsides IMHO. When I take colour I want it to be spot on. In digital, that can be a very elusive goal [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/sad.gif[/img]. I also reckon that it is going to lead to a generation of lost photos. Most photos last as long as the next hard disk crash. I know it doesn't have to be this way, but I know that is how it is for most people.

    I love taking black and white, knowing that it will outlast the child subjects if looked after [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif[/img]

    I also reckon ecconomically that digital is still quite expensive... simply because to replace my film cameras I'm up for 2-3k (although that isn't really equivalent), and then I have to replace them every 4 years because they become out of date :roll: :roll:

    No to mention expensive battery replacements, the costs of printing, effective storage.....

    How many of you out there know that the average cheapo cd has a life expectancy of 5 years, and that there is only one dvd on the market that guarentees a 50year archive life? When was the last time you saw a PC with a 5.25 inch floppy drive?

    <rant off> [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/laugh.gif[/img]
     2005 Defender 110 

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!