Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Moon photos!

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Melb. Vic.
    Posts
    6,045
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Moon photos!

    Thought this link might be of interest to you lot:

    Apollo Lunar Surface Journal

    1000's of HQ shots from the the Apollo missions.

    eg:


    I've heard there are still a couple of Hassleblad's still on the surface (Not sure if you could still get film for them though)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    NSW, Australia
    Posts
    4,656
    Total Downloaded
    0
    My dad has a Hassleblad... maybe thats where it came from?!
    [B][I]Andrew[/I][/B]

    [COLOR="YellowGreen"][U]1958 Series II SWB - "Gus"[/U][/COLOR]
    [COLOR="DarkGreen"][U]1965 Series IIA Ambulance 113-896 - "Ambrose"[/U][/COLOR]
    [COLOR="#DAA520"][U]1981 Mercedes 300D[/U][/COLOR]
    [U]1995 Defender 110[/U]
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ellendale Tasmania.
    Posts
    12,986
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Why is it that you don't see stars in all the moon landing photos
    Cheers Baz.

    2011 Discovery 4 SE 2.7L
    1990 Perentie FFR EX Aust Army
    1967 Series IIa 109 (Farm Truck)
    2007 BMW R1200GS
    1979 BMW R80/7
    1983 BMW R100TIC Ex ACT Police
    1994 Yamaha XT225 Serow

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Caboolture
    Posts
    2,469
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Cameras set for bright reflective objects and short exposures. Do the same outside at night here and you wont see stars. You need long exposures to pick up stars but then you get star trails.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Heathcote (in "The Shire")
    Posts
    5,348
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mick-Kelly View Post
    Cameras set for bright reflective objects and short exposures. Do the same outside at night here and you wont see stars. You need long exposures to pick up stars but then you get star trails.
    Interesting thought but that photo was taken in daylight (as much as it is on the moon) All ? landings were on the light side of the moon, but as there is no atmosphere there is no blue sky and very harsh shadows ie light or dark. I'm not really sure how that would impact on star visibility.


    Martyn

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Caboolture
    Posts
    2,469
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bushie View Post
    Interesting thought but that photo was taken in daylight (as much as it is on the moon) All ? landings were on the light side of the moon, but as there is no atmosphere there is no blue sky and very harsh shadows ie light or dark. I'm not really sure how that would impact on star visibility.


    Martyn
    The same way, stars are very faint and the only way to catch them is long exposures and usually stacking images. For example if i want to do a widefield star image you would need a tracking mount and long exposures. Even the you get field rotation.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Melb. Vic.
    Posts
    6,045
    Total Downloaded
    0
    You can see with this shot that no stars are visible:



    Shadows indicate the sun is still well above the horizon and very harsh light.

    Note: Lunar Rover too.......4wd/4w-steering....

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It is interesting that there are not visible the marks of the tyres on the sand. Photo shoped image by NASA
    Also the win that moove the flag does not afect the loose fabric on the LHS of the uniform of the astronaut
    The win is trong but there are not visible movement of sand near the surface

    The color of the sand and texture changes dramaticly after the spaceship

    On the LHS eg of the spaceship looks like that the Photoshop operator forgot to touch the texture/surface of the sand

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Caboolture
    Posts
    2,469
    Total Downloaded
    0
    There is no wind on the moon wind kinda implies an atmosphere............the flag is held out by a horizontal pole at the top. The different texture is because your looking into the distance and the lunar rover is pointed towards you so the tyre marks are behind it.
    So many bored conspiracy theorists out there. Look out behind you on the grassy knoll.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Mick-Kelly View Post
    There is no wind on the moon wind kinda implies an atmosphere............the flag is held out by a horizontal pole at the top. The different texture is because your looking into the distance and the lunar rover is pointed towards you so the tyre marks are behind it.
    So many bored conspiracy theorists out there. Look out behind you on the grassy knoll.
    I did not base my comments on conspiracy bad in what appears as a bad post processing job not to conceal facts but to touch up possible defects on the original before dveloping.
    Looks in that way to me.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!