Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: 35mm film..what to do?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by waynep View Post
    Wouldn't his Tokina lenses fit a Nikon DSLR ?
    It is diferent bayonet mounting

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,770
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by Chucaro View Post
    It is diferent bayonet mounting
    Yes but dont tokina use a removeable mount that you just swap to suit the body in use ?
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Kuching, Sarawak, Borneo
    Posts
    230
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by loanrangie View Post
    Yes but dont tokina use a removeable mount that you just swap to suit the body in use ?
    AFAIK, back in the last millennium, only Tamron made lenses that were of common design with adaptors to fit various brands' mounts.
    Made sense in the old days when things were simpler but not nowadays with so many electronic thingamajigs and therefore, connectors and even computers on board.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    503
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I still use my minolta gear regularly, an X700 like yours (loaded with velvia), a SRT 101 (portra) and an XE1 (PRO160C). I have the rokkor 24, 28, 50/1.4, 58/1.4, 35-70macro and a collection of telephoto lenses. This stuff is as cheap as cheaps. I mainly use negative film, at only $3 for processing (no prints) from gerry gibs it's still cheap. Slide film processing is around $12 from fitzgeralds. You can buy film on ebay for btn $3/36exp upto around $15/36 exp for velvia slide film. I purchased a V700 scanner, so I scan them at around 10 mega pixel resolution and then work in the digital world (inc printing). So using cheap film it can cost as little as 16cents per shot. And film is not dead yet - kodak recently anounced a new negative film designed for scanning (very low grain). It's not for everyone, but I enjoy taking my time with the film equipment. If shooting sports or anything fast - forget it thou. I work with optics and couldnt bring myself to purchase a DSLR with kit lens, and good DSLR lenses cost a lot more than my film and development costs, especally if you try to match the image quality, speed and field of view of the old rokkor optics. Going to full frame sensor DSLRs would help, but they are too expensive for me at the moment.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    mandurah
    Posts
    1,477
    Total Downloaded
    0
    make the jump...talk to the pros. A lot resisted the move, but are now in there. I have had to relearn a lot of techiniques but essentially the principles are the same. The beauty of digital is the ease of use, editing etc. Take a bracket of exposures, edit in camera, keep the one that works best. Fantastic for travel pics. You get to experiment and see the results immediately. Less lost shots, more keepers. Check with your local camera shop. I think your lenses will still be compatible. If not, don't settle for the kit lens. I did a deal with my shop. They will usually do a deal to enable you to buy a body, and spend a little more getting a good prime lens.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!