Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Filters - What do I need?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,497
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Filters - What do I need?

    Coming to grips with the new 500D and 72mm 18-200 IS. What basic filters should I get, given most of my shots are outside in sunny QLD?

    UV, skylight, polarising, combo?

    Cheers.

  2. #2
    dmdigital's Avatar
    dmdigital is offline OldBushie Vendor

    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Arnhem Land, NT
    Posts
    8,492
    Total Downloaded
    0
    You don't need a UV filter on a digital camera. That said I personally put a protective filter on all my lenses as I'd rather break or damage that than the front element, others will disagree and say why spend so much on a lens only to put something in front of it. My only advice is buy a good B+W or Hoya protective filter.

    Other than that a CPL (Circular polarizer) would be the only thing unless you later find you need ND's or Graduated ND's. Best CPL is the B+W Kasemann, expensive, but as the polarizing layer is fused into the glass and the two halves sealed then it is an investment.

    For the CPL or any additional filters I would recommend buying 77mm and a 77->72mm step down ring for your lens. Then if you buy in L-series lenses you will have a filter to fit them as most are 77mm front mounts.
    MY15 Discovery 4 SE SDV6

    Past: 97 D1 Tdi, 03 D2a Td5, 08 Kimberley Kamper, 08 Defender 110 TDCi, 99 Defender 110 300Tdi[/SIZE]

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    On the road around Australia
    Posts
    900
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Seconding what dm_td5 says. I've used the Canon 30D as my primary camera for a few years now, and the first thing I buy for each of my lenses is a UV filter, not so much for filtering, but to add a protective element to a quite expensive lens. It's paid off twice - once in Pakistan, and once in Russia - bag got dropped, filter was smashed to smithereens, but the lens itself was unharmed.


    For bright light conditions such as what you get here, you will certainly need a circular polariser to cut down on the harshness in the resulting photos. I use one in 90-95% of my outdoor shots.

    Other than that, additional filters are purely for adding artistic touches to the photos. Depending on whether you are a purist or not, i.e. want to add these effects during the photographic process, most of these effects can be replicated quite easily nowadays in even the most basic of digital imaging software.

    One thing to note though, is that with the 18-200 IS lens, you probably will notice a little bit of rounding of the corners of the photo by the edges of the filter when you zoom out to the maximum, so buy as low profile of a filter as you can. And while you're at it, buy a lens hood - it's a godsend when taking photos into the sun.

  4. #4
    dmdigital's Avatar
    dmdigital is offline OldBushie Vendor

    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Arnhem Land, NT
    Posts
    8,492
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mike_ie View Post
    And while you're at it, buy a lens hood - it's a godsend when taking photos into the sun.
    I would have thought that like the Nikon it would come with a lens hood If it doesn't then definitely get one.
    MY15 Discovery 4 SE SDV6

    Past: 97 D1 Tdi, 03 D2a Td5, 08 Kimberley Kamper, 08 Defender 110 TDCi, 99 Defender 110 300Tdi[/SIZE]

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    On the road around Australia
    Posts
    900
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by dm_td5 View Post
    I would have thought that like the Nikon it would come with a lens hood If it doesn't then definitely get one.
    The 500D is a Canon, and sadly, they don't come by default with a lens hood. Not in my experience at least

    When I say "lens hood" by the way, I mean this thing:



    ...not this thing


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South East Tasmania
    Posts
    10,705
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mike_ie View Post
    ........
    Other than that, additional filters are purely for adding artistic touches to the photos. Depending on whether you are a purist or not, i.e. want to add these effects during the photographic process, most of these effects can be replicated quite easily nowadays in even the most basic of digital imaging software.
    Grad filters are not for additional touches and cannot 100% replicated with basic software.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    4,497
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by mike_ie View Post
    ................ And while you're at it, buy a lens hood - it's a godsend when taking photos into the sun.
    Thanks Mike. And you're right, not hood came with the camera.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    On the road around Australia
    Posts
    900
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Chucaro View Post
    Grad filters are not for additional touches and cannot 100% replicated with basic software.
    I agree mate - I for one, don't use editing software other than to resize photos, or convert from RAW to jpg. If I can't capture it with the camera, I don't want to add it in later on the computer. But as I said, it completely depends on your attitude towards this type of photography.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Melbourne, VIC
    Posts
    648
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have a UV filter on all my lenses for protection only.
    I have a 77mm circular polariser which only gets used occasionally to control reflections in glass and water.

    I have a whole set of cokin effects filters that don't fit any lenses anymore since the average size of my lenses has gone from 55mm to 77mm. I wouldn't use them anyway except the ND grad, as adding effects in software is much more controllable and much less permanent.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Kuching, Sarawak, Borneo
    Posts
    230
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I agree with the use of filters as "crumple zones" for expensive lenses. Also have had mud and sand thrown against front lens element before (we do like our Land Rovers, don't we?). Less painful washing and wiping filters than that lovely curved purple glass.
    With some thought to "cheap glass in front of expensive glass", I bought a few 77mm Nikon NC (Neutral Colour) filters, not because I have any evidence they are superior to Hoya or B+W but simply that they are made by the same guys who made the lens so how bad can they be?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!