I have three.
Two single burner and one powerhouse
Works good just dont use E10 and maybe get some petrol stabiliser additive...
I’d bite the bullet and buy new Colin. It will last a lifetime and I’ve seen crap used one go for $70+ they really hold their value. I’ve used our used one for 10 years now and only changed the generator once. It’s worked in Actic Finland at -15c to boil water and heat meals. Such a great stove. We also have a twin burner I picked up at a garage sale here for $10!
with regards to not running well on unleaded, some of the earlier fuel stoves were not “duel fuel” so only ran well on Coleman white gas / shellite.
Parts for these stoves are not an issue.
G
I have three.
Two single burner and one powerhouse
Works good just dont use E10 and maybe get some petrol stabiliser additive...
What do you guys see as the advantages of a Coleman dual fuel over a gas stove?
No gas bottle to carry (or worry about test dates).
Higher heat output that the disposable gas cannister type stoves.
Fuel available at Bunnings & most hardware stores.
Small volume of fuel gives a lot of hours cooking.
If you're stuck use petrol (but note the comments about potential problems related to this).
I often carry a dual fuel lantern as well, so fuel common to both.
Don't need to use battery power.
Big light output.
Colin
'56 Series 1 with homemade welder
'65 Series IIa Dormobile
'70 SIIa GS
'76 SIII 88" (Isuzu C240)
'81 SIII FFR
'95 Defender Tanami
Motorcycles :-
Vincent Rapide, Panther M100, Norton BIG4, Electra & Navigator, Matchless G80C, Suzuki SV650
'56 Series 1 with homemade welder
'65 Series IIa Dormobile
'70 SIIa GS
'76 SIII 88" (Isuzu C240)
'81 SIII FFR
'95 Defender Tanami
Motorcycles :-
Vincent Rapide, Panther M100, Norton BIG4, Electra & Navigator, Matchless G80C, Suzuki SV650
Hi,
The bush walking shops have a range of fuel bottles with a dispensing device built in, making it easy to get fuel in a small opening without spillage.
Cheers
Looking at reviews of the Coleman two-burner dual fuel stove, it sounds like the following are the key points... what do you guys reckon?
Pro's:
- Robust long lasting design
- Powerful burners
- Easy to get fuel
- No need to carry gas bottle
Cons:
- Can be difficult to adjust the two burners separately?
- Relatively tight pot space?
- Cant actually turn off until the fuel in the lines burns out?
- Messy - fuel drips from line when removed?
Hi,
The LH burner is for simmer only, it bleeds fuel/air mix from the main burner.
They take up a lot of space.
The fuel load is huge, it will last weeks.
Two single units would be a better arangement if space is an issue.
Mine would not turn off immediately , needed to turn it right down, then blow the flame out, then release the pressure.
Cheers
For me. I got mine as on cold mornings gas just won't work. Anything down around zero = no gas pressure. Had always just dealt with it but the last trip pushed me over as every single night was sub-zero and morning cuppas were problematic... for three weeks straightBut the FIL's ancient Coleman stove always worked perfectly. Had to go billy in hand each morning...
DiscoClax
'94 D1 3dr Aegean Blue - 300ci stroker RV8, 4HP24 & Compushift, usual bar-work, various APT gear, 235/85 M/Ts, 3deg arms, Detroit lockers, $$$$, etc.
'08 RRS TDV8 Rimini Red - 285/60R18 Falken AT3Ws, Rock slider-steps, APT full under-protection, Mitch Hitch, Tradesman rack, Traxide DBS, Gap IID
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! | 
    Search All the Web! | 
  
|---|
| 
 | 
 | 
Bookmarks