DO NOT BUY A COLEMAN! THEY ARE RUBBISH!
Nah - kidding.![]()
Love my Coleman dual fuel stove and lantern.
Fast, hot, clean, safe, economical, reliable.
Hoping not to have any gas in the new camper.
cheers
DO NOT BUY A COLEMAN! THEY ARE RUBBISH!
Nah - kidding.![]()
[B][I]Andrew[/I][/B]
[COLOR="YellowGreen"][U]1958 Series II SWB - "Gus"[/U][/COLOR]
[COLOR="DarkGreen"][U]1965 Series IIA Ambulance 113-896 - "Ambrose"[/U][/COLOR]
[COLOR="#DAA520"][U]1981 Mercedes 300D[/U][/COLOR]
[U]1995 Defender 110[/U]
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Yes, agree, you do need to watch out with a large frypan or tall billy on the single burners. Probably not good if you have kids around. But for the two of us, we find them OK, with a bit of care. We spent 12 weeks on tour with only those 2 single burners for cooking- no spills.
I guess I should check out the two burners again. Last time I had a look I thought the burners were a bit close together.
We got the three burner. Lots of pan space, but takes up more space to pack away (and weighs more) too. Decisions, decisions.....
Decision made easy: Get a traditional Coleman 2-burner dual-fuel stove and a single for back-up (in case the primary stove parts get gummed up, can't keep pressure, etc.) and/or for instances where your pot is too large to fit inside the windscreen panels!![]()
But you can use heavy-duty flashing (Al foil) as a wind-break on the single burners (but not the flashing with the bitumen coating).
Last edited by Bushwanderer; 1st January 2010 at 03:53 PM. Reason: clarification
I have a Coleman three burner stove bought in 1977. Never had a problem with it. A very well designed and well made piece of equipment. I have always used Shellite but unleaded petrol is OK. I bought the folding stove stand as well.
URSUSMAJOR
But wasn't the post supposed to be about "expedition camping"?
I wouldn't like to carry a two- or three-burner stove doing that.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks