Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: 91 with viscous TC

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Central Vic
    Posts
    683
    Total Downloaded
    0

    91 with viscous TC

    I picked up a fairly cheap 91 RRC that has the Borg Warner TC, ive driven these on road and a little off road but nothing to challenging.

    Well yesterday i gave this old girl a run on some fairly challenging tracks, steep hills with loose rocks and some parts greasy clay, i was surprised to say the least with the TC keeping traction....

    It went everywhere i pointed it and it impressed me..... now ive heard these TC aren't as strong as the LT230, how true is this , is it a bit like 10 spline vs 24 spline axle argument???

    looking for feedback from those who actually use these TC's.....nearly converted i think

    Cheers
    89 RRC
    92 RRC Sherwood

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Avoca Beach
    Posts
    14,152
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I am a bit of a fan of The Borg warner transfer case having driven my 91 around Oz a couple of times and up the Northern Half of the Tele track towing 1tonne.

    The weakest part of the BW is the rear output shaft splines in the centre diff. If you have 200KK on the car it is pretty sure they are very worn. I decided to check mine before Cape York and found them a bees dick from disengaging ( I had to drive it out with a hammer). I also bought another case for $20 on ebay where the owner thought he had a broken chain but sure enough it was a stripped output shaft. There is no drive with a stripped rear output shaft so it is something to look at or possibly be stranded .

    The VC also can seize but IMHO this is from people sitting there with one front spinning as mine was still OK at 240KK when I sold the car. I understand Ashcroft are going to recondition them again soon. An LT230 centre diff will die if a wheel is excessively spun unlocked also.

    The chain rarely breaks although on 38As the chain stretches while the out put shaft is OK. Go figure as they are the same case but flipped.

    They are also tough. I had a rear main seal done on my 91 and the specialist "forgot" to refill the transfer after having it lying on the floor. A couple of weeks later I decided to do an oil change and found only 200Ml of oil in it. They have an oil pump which probably saved it by pumping the limited oil around.

    Regards Philip A

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Ballarat,Vic,Aus
    Posts
    3,855
    Total Downloaded
    0
    My experience is with the two 92'ish models I purchased in teh last couple of years ... one was nice and smooth ... probably low'ish milage and it trashed the driveline not long after I purchased the car ( the VC locked up and took out a CV joint). The 2nd was stuck "open" ... my best guess is the viscous unit died hundreds of thousands of kms ago in this car ... but because it failed open the driveline didn't get trashed. It had HUGE lash in it (no doubt the chain was completely flogged out).

    If you have a rebuilt one I'm sure it's great. For an old car of unknown milage ... I wouldn't touch one with a barge pole, as I don't reckon you could ever trust it not to die on you at the most in-opportune time (well I guess you could always rebuilt it so you don't have a concern). It's way cheaper to fit a noisy LT230 and forgot about the issue forever though (and hey, it's fun putting the diff lock in right ).

    seeya,
    Shane L.
    Proper cars--
    '92 Range Rover 3.8V8 ... 5spd manual
    '85 Series II CX2500 GTi Turbo I :burnrubber:
    '63 ID19 x 2 :wheelchair:
    '72 DS21 ie 5spd pallas
    Modern Junk:
    '07 Poogoe 407 HDi 6spd manual :zzz:
    '11 Poogoe RCZ HDI 6spd manual

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Gosnells
    Posts
    6,148
    Total Downloaded
    0
    It was the the locked up VC on my Classic that 'killed' it for me... As has been mentioned, they almost always fail in the LOCKED mode, and therefore take out bits of driveline, like CVs.
    My own personal suspicion is that they are slooooowwwly wearing it anyway, by the mere fact that the VC 'resists' the geared centre-diff from...'diffing'

    As to 'why' they have different failure patterns, Classic vs P38, maybe 'cos the front-rear weight distribution is not identical, and/or
    - a long shot - placarded tyre pressures on the Classic are lower Front than Rear.

    Bottom line is, the VC is IMHO, an unpredictable, consumable and over-priced item, impossible to buy for reasonable dollars,,, which is why I never replaced mine, just drove it as a RWD (no front prop shaft)

    And yes, I would agree with all of you who suggested a T/C swap, - should have $pent a few $$s and had a re-con LT230 installed and kept the car (in AWD) Turn the radio up a bit if extra soundproofing doesn't solve the 'noise problem'.

    Anyway, both the car and spare ("OK"?) BW case have emigrated to Good Homes, and we use the Father-In Law's Ssyang Yong when we need load space/trailer towing.

    - And everything on it works properly, including rain sensing wipers, auto-dim interior mirror, AWD system, etc....

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Perth WA
    Posts
    511
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Cool

    Hi All,

    My 92 Classic from discussions with all on this site has had the viscous transfer box replaced by an LT230.

    I find it quiet in the cabin and that's with it running 245 /70/ 15 AT tyres .....although maybe its because my 2 door
    has 3 spd Borg Warner Auto (factory fitted) with a nice burble to the exhaust system that makes it seem quiet

    Baggy

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!