Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 31

Thread: RRC what year got seats with arm rests?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maryborough QLD
    Posts
    4,322
    Total Downloaded
    0
    All Rangies up til 89 were called Hi-Lines, although in the UK they're always referd to as a Vogue from day one I think. But all Aus spec Rangies were called Vogues from this time on (89 onwrds)

    Best way to tell is that all Hi-Lines in Aus all had the LT230 transfer, Vogues IICR were all BW Viscous coupling Transfer cases.

    Trav

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by aquarangie View Post
    All Rangies up til 89 were called Hi-Lines, although in the UK they're always referd to as a Vogue from day one I think. But all Aus spec Rangies were called Vogues from this time on (89 onwrds)

    Best way to tell is that all Hi-Lines in Aus all had the LT230 transfer, Vogues IICR were all BW Viscous coupling Transfer cases.

    Trav
    Must be market specific.
    In NZ they were Vogues from about 85. My 85 is a Vogue but it was an import from the middle east.
    We didn't get the Hiline model or the sherwood model. But they did change from LT230 to BW after 88.

    There are two door seatbelt equipped seats with armrests, the CSK should have them and I'm assured 2 doors were available right through till the end of the classic line (even though very few were sold).
    The UK aftermarket will have the seats you want.

  3. #13
    VladTepes's Avatar
    VladTepes is offline Major Part of the Heart and Soul of AULRO Subscriber
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bracken Ridge, Qld
    Posts
    16,057
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I've not rad all this thread yet, but if you are even slightlytall you are better off saving your money. I reckon those armrests (as fitted to my 94 Classic) are rubbish. As you adjust them up and down they actually change angle - really uncomfortable. As a result I don;t use them.


    (No you can't have my seats!)
    It's not broken. It's "Carbon Neutral".


    gone


    1993 Defender 110 ute "Doris"
    1994 Range Rover Vogue LSE "The Luxo-Barge"
    1994 Defender 130 HCPU "Rolly"
    1996 Discovery 1

    current

    1995 Defender 130 HCPU and Suzuki GSX1400


  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maryborough QLD
    Posts
    4,322
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by VladTepes View Post
    I've not rad all this thread yet, but if you are even slightlytall you are better off saving your money. I reckon those armrests (as fitted to my 94 Classic) are rubbish. As you adjust them up and down they actually change angle - really uncomfortable. As a result I don;t use them.


    (No you can't have my seats!)
    I've owned 4 Rangies with armrests and find them comfortable. Maybe you should stop driving that bloody Defender with crapola seats, but I am a short **** (5'9" is short by todays standards it is), also the Rahgie wasn't meant for lanky buggers like you

    Trav

  5. #15
    VladTepes's Avatar
    VladTepes is offline Major Part of the Heart and Soul of AULRO Subscriber
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bracken Ridge, Qld
    Posts
    16,057
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yeah Rangies are built for Queens
    It's not broken. It's "Carbon Neutral".


    gone


    1993 Defender 110 ute "Doris"
    1994 Range Rover Vogue LSE "The Luxo-Barge"
    1994 Defender 130 HCPU "Rolly"
    1996 Discovery 1

    current

    1995 Defender 130 HCPU and Suzuki GSX1400


  6. #16
    VladTepes's Avatar
    VladTepes is offline Major Part of the Heart and Soul of AULRO Subscriber
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bracken Ridge, Qld
    Posts
    16,057
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Not that there's anything wrong with that !
    It's not broken. It's "Carbon Neutral".


    gone


    1993 Defender 110 ute "Doris"
    1994 Range Rover Vogue LSE "The Luxo-Barge"
    1994 Defender 130 HCPU "Rolly"
    1996 Discovery 1

    current

    1995 Defender 130 HCPU and Suzuki GSX1400


  7. #17
    VladTepes's Avatar
    VladTepes is offline Major Part of the Heart and Soul of AULRO Subscriber
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bracken Ridge, Qld
    Posts
    16,057
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Just having a go Trav !
    It's not broken. It's "Carbon Neutral".


    gone


    1993 Defender 110 ute "Doris"
    1994 Range Rover Vogue LSE "The Luxo-Barge"
    1994 Defender 130 HCPU "Rolly"
    1996 Discovery 1

    current

    1995 Defender 130 HCPU and Suzuki GSX1400


  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide - Torrens Park
    Posts
    7,291
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by VladTepes View Post
    , but if you are even slightlytall you are better off saving your money. I reckon those armrests (as fitted to my 94 Classic) are rubbish.

    I use mine all the time and I am well over 6 feet tall. Very comfortable.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BigJon View Post
    I use mine all the time and I am well over 6 feet tall. Very comfortable.
    I'm 6'3" and lurve my arm rests

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Maryborough QLD
    Posts
    4,322
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Get stuffed Vlad, the rough-**** ride in that Defender must have shaken a few nuts loose in your head

    You're the only one I know who doesn't like the arm resrs in the Rangies.

    Trav

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!