Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: High/Low changes

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DeeJay View Post
    CDL should always accompany low range
    Hmm no - I often use low range withbout the CDL - the criteria is quality of surface.

    Cheers

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Wheelers Hill, Melbourne
    Posts
    4,085
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    Hmm no - I often use low range withbout the CDL - the criteria is quality of surface.

    Cheers

    Garry
    Then you probably won't have problems shifting from low to high ratio

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Yinnar South, Vic
    Posts
    9,943
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DeeJay View Post
    Then you probably won't have problems shifting from low to high ratio
    CDL engaged or not will not present problems with range shifting, 2 seperate machanisms

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DeeJay View Post
    Then you probably won't have problems shifting from low to high ratio
    Hi DeeJay - its been a slow day for me so maybe I am a bit slow, so sorry I don't follow your point.

    Basically I select the cdl when I think I need it, I select an appropriate range and sometimes the two coincide, sometimes not. In slow technical stuff certainly low range/cdl (though I did do Monkey Gum without knowing my cdl was not working) but higher speed hi range offroad the cdl is usually out as it chatters away above 70kph.

    Cheers

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Wheelers Hill, Melbourne
    Posts
    4,085
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    Hi DeeJay - its been a slow day for me so maybe I am a bit slow, so sorry I don't follow your point.

    Basically I select the cdl when I think I need it, I select an appropriate range and sometimes the two coincide, sometimes not. In slow technical stuff certainly low range/cdl (though I did do Monkey Gum without knowing my cdl was not working) but higher speed hi range offroad the cdl is usually out as it chatters away above 70kph.

    Cheers

    Garry

    No probs,
    For you- I will explain. This thread is about a forum member who is experiencing difficulty changing from low ratio to high. One explanation not forwarded was the possibility of transmission wind up causing it to be difficult to shift. The fact it was made easier by reversing made me think it was a possibility.
    Why would this not be a reason?

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane, Queensland
    Posts
    5,778
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I mostly use the button in high range. With a turbo I rarely need low range. :-)

    I have experienced the high/low leaver on the LT85 freezing because of corrosion. WD40 fixed it. It may be worth a try.
    L322 tdv8 poverty pack - wow
    Perentie 110 wagon ARN 49-107 (probably selling) turbo, p/steer, RFSV front axle/trutrack, HF, gullwing windows, double jerrys etc.
    Perentie 110 wagon ARN 48-699 another project
    Track Trailer ARN 200-117
    REMLR # 137

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DeeJay View Post
    No probs,
    For you- I will explain. This thread is about a forum member who is experiencing difficulty changing from low ratio to high. One explanation not forwarded was the possibility of transmission wind up causing it to be difficult to shift. The fact it was made easier by reversing made me think it was a possibility.
    Why would this not be a reason?
    OK - I had a look back through the posts and missed your initial post about transmission windup as the cdl was on. My post asking whether we were talking about CDLs or Hi/Lo range was not aimed at you but AIF said - as I indicated I missed your post until now.

    I see where you are coming from. I am not so sure but only because I have never experienced having trouble changing between hi and lo because of windup but can see it may happen - I have had plenty of experience with the opposite in not being able to disengage the CDL because of the CDL.

    Thanks for that clarification - I was concerned that I may have missed something which I had.

    Cheers

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  8. #18
    Bearman's Avatar
    Bearman is offline TopicToaster Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hay Point
    Posts
    4,043
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Most likely it is because of the input gear modification done to the majority of the perenties as they needed gearbox repairs. As i stated earlier, harder to engage but less prone to disengaging. This modification required replacing the engaging flanges of the input gear with full length teeth ones.
    Cheers......Brian
    1985 110 V8 County
    1998 110 Perentie GS Cargo 6X6 ARN 202516 (Brutus)

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    NNSW
    Posts
    45
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks for these answers.
    Normally I change when stationary which could explain the smaller linkage gap and/or transmission windup because, as DeeJay noted, my TC issues are Low to High. I'll try reversing and see if that helps.

    Which leads me to another question - Why do TC gears need to be so much stiffer and more difficult to operate than regular GB gears? Why didn't they just invent something like a mini TC clutch?

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Hunter Valley, NSW
    Posts
    232
    Total Downloaded
    0
    In the ... er ... "other brand" 4WD I owned of a similar vintage (92 if I recall), the TC was easier to shift (but ultimately less versatile, IMHO). This "Super Select" TC was a significant marketing point for said brand, back in the day.

    This other design did have it's own limitations. Such as needing the wheels to do 1/4 turn to engage 4wd. Caused me issues when I accidently dropped the front wheels into a ditch one evening and was stuck in 2wd.

    Later models of various brands moved to vacuum operated TCs in the mid-late 90s. Easier to operate yet again, at the cost of more complexity.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!