That's was an interesting enough question to get the brain kicking over, so I fired up Excel.
The way I see it, you're interested in comparing flow rates through the snorkel between the different engines. For a simple (good enough) calc; you need the Max RPM, engine swept capacity and the intake pressure.
Now it's important to note that this ignores the volumetric efficiency of the engine - as well as the fact that fuel enters the cylinders with the air - but as we are ignoring that with all of the engines and as we are only interested in comparing them it is acceptable IMO.
So as you can see, the N/A 4BD1 uses less air than a 300Tdi when going all out. A 4BD1T at 15PSI uses more, but still only as much as a V8 (which uses the same snorkel). Even then I think there's still a fair safety margin built in.
To check my results I went looking for somebody else who had tried to figure out the same thing. Donaldson have this information sheet on the topic and their method gives the same results, but they use magic numbers and imperial units and we can't have that
[ame="http://india.donaldson.com/en/engine/support/datalibrary/065857.pdf"]here[/ame]
For some real world info. The existing 4BD1 intake tract (3") mates up to the Safari snorkel well, but the snorkel is designed to mate to the 300Tdi (2.5" from memory) intake tract as well. The snorkel is tapered where it joins to the tract, so you trim the 2.5" diameter part off up to the 3" diameter part.


 
						
					 
					
					 
				
				
				
					 Reply With Quote
  Reply With Quote 
						
					 Originally Posted by BadCo.
 Originally Posted by BadCo.
					


 
				
Bookmarks