Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 36

Thread: UHF Advice please...

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Bushwanderer View Post
    Hi Jon,

    PS: I suspect that you're being subjected to the UHF equivalent of the Ford .vs. Holden wars. Make your own mind up and I believe that you'll be happy with the result.
    Icom Rules
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Avoca Beach
    Posts
    14,152
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Just to put the reliability into perspective , I have had a uniden UH11 for 20years with no problems.

    Like the Engel of UHF Cbs.

    Regards Philip A

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Warrandyte, vic
    Posts
    920
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have used gme for the last 20 years or so and never had any issues with reliability. Having said that I am changing to icom for my D3 as I wanted a unit with everything including the speaker in the mic.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Blue Mountains
    Posts
    153
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PhilipA View Post
    Just to put the reliability into perspective , I have had a uniden UH11 for 20years with no problems.

    Like the Engel of UHF Cbs.

    Regards Philip A
    Every uniden I have owned has been returned with faults - more like a Waeco !

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    mandurah
    Posts
    1,477
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    I recently bought a IC 440 after looking at both the Icom and GME. As mentioned the ICOm has the speaker in the handset the GME does not. As my 101 is very noisy I have set up the Icom with an external speaker as well. This does not disable the handset speaker which means I have no problem hearing.

    The Icom cradle is great - allows the radio to simply unclip for use in other vehicles (I bought a second cradle for my other car.

    I have a 6.5/9.5 db GME aerial combo and it works great.

    Radio was $410 and aerial $79 from Prestige.

    The only down side is that you need to carry the manual with you to use the Icom for its fullest functionality but basic functions such as search, vol, squelch and change channels are easy to use - however I think the GME is the same.

    I think the main advantage of the Icom over the GME is the speaker in the handset - works well even in my 101 so you really do not need to worry about an additional speaker. I could have got a GME on Ebay for about $375 delivered.

    Garry
    GME are currently advertising a package complete with antenna through trade sites, at $385.00 plus GST. The model advertised has a speaker in the handset/mike.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by ADMIRAL View Post
    GME are currently advertising a package complete with antenna through trade sites, at $385.00 plus GST. The model advertised has a speaker in the handset/mike.
    I would be surprised as the relevant models are the GME Tx 3340 and Tx 3440 and neither has the speaker in the handset. Some models that do not have the radio controls on the handset may have a speaker in the handset so maybe it is one of these that were advertised.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    1,546
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have been following this thread with some interest as I am in the market for a UHF. What is not clear to me is why people want a speaker in the handset (which I suspect would be generally smaller and inferior to the alternate) and why people want 'all' the controls in the handset. Any explanations fellas?

    Cheers
    KarlB

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sydney's gritty inner west (2204) and verdant Mount Wilson
    Posts
    7,446
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by KarlB View Post
    I have been following this thread with some interest as I am in the market for a UHF. What is not clear to me is why people want a speaker in the handset (which I suspect would be generally smaller and inferior to the alternate) and why people want 'all' the controls in the handset. Any explanations fellas?

    Cheers
    KarlB
    I'll explain why I chose the Icom IC-440:

    I have a Puma Defender and there are not many places to put a unit so that the display and controls can be seen easily. I could have installed an overhead console but for the money spent on that and a "traditional" CB unit the cost of the Icom was much less. The Icom had the features I wanted plus some.

    The main unit sits neatly and out of the way mounted to the side of the centre cubby box. This location was easy with regards to getting the power and aerial to the unit.

    I'm still working on the best position for the handset when travelling, for the moment it sits in a cradle suction cupped to the windscreen.

    The speaker in the hand set works well, I haven't had any difficulty either with volume or sound quality.

    Mahn England

    DEFENDER 110 D300 SE '23 (the S M E G)

    Ex DEFENDER 110 wagon '08 (the Kelvinator)
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/members-rides/105691-one_iotas-110-inch-kelvinator.html

    Ex 300Tdi Disco:



  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Karl - depends on the layout and of your vehicle - some are noisy so having the speaker in the handset which is up near your face when communicating is a bonus (you can still have a remote speaker as well). Some do not have the space for a radio so it has to be mounted remotely or out of sight so have all the controls on the handset. Those with a remote face still have to have it mounted somewhere, as well as the main unit.

    If I could mount a radio within reach, still hear it and it was easy to move from vehicle to vehicle I would have bought a basic layout radio. I find it convenient to have everything in the one spot - works great for me.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    mandurah
    Posts
    1,477
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by KarlB View Post
    I have been following this thread with some interest as I am in the market for a UHF. What is not clear to me is why people want a speaker in the handset (which I suspect would be generally smaller and inferior to the alternate) and why people want 'all' the controls in the handset. Any explanations fellas?

    Cheers
    KarlB
    The speaker in the handset has a few advantages, in that it is generally placed for easy access, and most times, that corresponds with easy to hear. If the main unit is half hidden, in a console or under the dash, it can be difficult to hear. The handset mike is also very handy when answering a radio call outside of the vehicle.

    I had an overhead console in my last vehicle. While it was perceived initially as handy ( and looking good ) I could not hear the internal speaker, and eventually mounted an external speaker on the console above my head level. My radio had a conventional setup, std mike, all controls on the radio. I had to take my eyes off the road to check channels, change frequencies etc. Not good. These controls in a mike, can be held up to read and operate without taking the eyes off the road.

    I would not go for an overhead console again. The mike has to be easy to unclip and access. This invariably meant it copped you in the ear, or swung across the vehicle when in rough terrain. Distracting to say the least.
    Last edited by ADMIRAL; 5th May 2010 at 09:53 PM. Reason: typo

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!