Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Autotune Antenna question

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    3,435
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Autotune Antenna question

    I was wondering if in areas where comms is marginal if the autotune would act like an ATU. In that if a long wire was attatched to either the whip itself or the top of the tuner would it tune the longwire to the frequency chosen to give a better signal than the whip alone?.

    Didiman

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    The autotune is an ATU.

    If you have a combined length of the whip and long wire that are close to a factor of the full wave the ATU should be able to tune.

    Remember that a modern HF autotune from Codan or Barrett is capable of tuning antenna length between 40 metres and 2.5 metres.

    A 1/4 wave antenna length for VKS737 channel:
    1. 5455KHz = 13.75M
    2. 8022KHz = 9.35M
    3. 11612KHz = 6.46M
    4. 14977KHz = 5.01M
    5. 3995KHz = 18.77M
    6. 6796KHz = 11.04M
    7. 10180KHz = 7.37M
    Nothing should prevent you making up a long wire of the correct length for each channel with a fitting that connects directly to the top of the ATU itself.

    One of my mil HF radios comes with a long wire antenna that has plug and socket connections that allow you to select the correct length for the desired frequencies.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    3,435
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks for that Diana.
    I was pretty sure it would but thought I would get confirmation.

    Didiman

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    281
    Total Downloaded
    0
    As Di says these are Antenna Tuning Units (ATUs).

    Both the Codan 9350 and the Barrett 910 tune the antenna to close to the 1/4 wavelength for the relevant frequency. They do this via slightly different methods but basically try to match the electrical length internally with the addition of the whip to this specific length.

    My thoughts are that attaching a long wire would not be good for the ATU as they are specifically setup to work out a tuned length with the whip attached NOT a long wire. It may work but then again it may not and that could prove expensive.

    Why add another long wire to replace the whip when it would be much simpler to just carry a dipole antenna and swap the RF connector out from the ATU and attach the dipole.

    This is what I used to do with my Barrett when traveling about in the wilds. It served as an excellent substitute for the ATU when appropriate things, like trees, were about. It also served as a backup should the unforeseen occur and the ATU unit became a NFU.

    The dipole kit takes up much less room than a wire tuned whip as a backup.

    Just my 5c worth.

    Cheers,
    Iain

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Hi Iain

    You are of course correct about the design factors, but given the electrical length at both ends of the frequency bands the autotune is capable, it "should" be able to accomodate the lower frequencies in the 150 metre down to the 30 metre bands where VKS737 operate but you may find the ATU is unable to accomodate frequencies in the 9 or 10 metre bands (9 metre band = 27MHz). Again you are more likely to be able to tune if the wire length is at or approaching 1/8 or 1/4 or 1/2 of the desired wave length.

    Remember the NVIS kit supplied by Codan contains an antenna element more than twice as long as the standard whips supplied with the 9350.

    Diana

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    3,435
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I did think it might tune a random long wire but thats OK. I used to carry 1/2 wave dipoles for 10, 15, and 20 metres when on the yacht but I did not have a tuner for the TS 520.
    My old Tracker Lynx with tapped whip has given up the ghost and not worth repairing so I am getting more up to date with a Barrett 550 and Autotune.
    So I will make some dipoles and see if I can extend the range.

    Didiman

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    281
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    Hi Iain

    Remember the NVIS kit supplied by Codan contains an antenna element more than twice as long as the standard whips supplied with the 9350.

    Diana
    Agreed Diana,

    The NVIS kit does have a 4+metre whip to use with the 9350. Although at the lower frequency end of the bands this isn't much out of a 1/4 wavelength. 2m extra out of 37+m or so that the unit is tuning for. Remember the ATU is trying to achieve SWR of 1.5:1 or better. If I recall it complains bitterly if it can't get better that 2:1.

    The Barrett does NVIS with the normal whip so as you say should tune OK with a random long wire also.

    In hindsight it may well prove OK to do as suggested since the "smarts" in the radios tend to detune the back ends if the ATU signals it can't tune well enough to protect the RF signal amplifiers. Although in saying that it may just drive the thing crazy trying to achieve tune. Also a detuned back end is not what you want if you're trying to get a signal out.

    As you suggest as long as the wire approached the appropriate fraction of the wavelength concerned you'd most likely be OK.

    Incidentally the 27MHz (CB ) frequencies are in the 11m band aren't they since the 28Mhz amateur allocations are considered to be at 10m.

    I'm sure it would make an interesting experiment for someone to test this wire and whip ATU combination.

    Maybe one of our resident radio techs might have some more thoughts.

    Me, i'm happy with my dipole. It's marked in 0.5m intervals so I just measure out the appropriate length on each side and hoist them up. Only trouble is at the moment the radio is decommissioned and I can't find my dipole kit

    I guess the bottom line here Didiman is that there appear to be several ways of removing feline dermis.

    Cheers,
    Iain

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!