There's plenty been written on this but for me, I can't see the point of them. They just limit the charge your batteries can get. The cars alternator does a far better job IMO. I don't get why people make things so complicated to be honest. I only see them as a marketing ploy as all the blurb I've read on them and every 'expert' I've spoken to all drag out the same drivel which doesn't hold up to close scrutiny. I'm an Electrician by trade and work on generators and engine control so I'm just putting that in so others don't think I'm coming from a background that may not understand them - I do, better than most.
I've got 3 vehicles set up with at least 2 batteries, one with 3. Add to that all of those vehicles tow my caravan that has 2 more in it and everything works great. One vehicle is old school 1970's the next is old school 1980's and the last although over a decade old now, would fall into the more modern category - an L322 so certainly packed with electronics, but nothing as fancy as a D4.
All batteries are different brands and types, no issues with any of them and the setups range from the most simple - all batteries connected together all the time (I've actually found this works best for me), one with a cheap automatic battery isolator, and one with a Traxide unit - this was in the L322 and worked very well at keeping the vehicles main battery at a higher level of charge. It has much better smarts than any other controller on the market.
This is the system I would go for in a modern vehicle IMO.



Reply With Quote


Bookmarks