Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 32

Thread: Is HF radio dying?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Drouin East, Vic
    Posts
    2,780
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Is HF radio dying?

    I'm re-considering the merits of HF radio as a means of emergency communication after our latest outback trip, wondering how our experience compares to that of others here. We've been VKS-737 subscribers for many years. I leave the kids with details of how to get a message to us when we are traveling remotely and tell them that if we fail to return or to show up when expected that the network log will have a record of our location and plans as reported daily.
    Problem is, the network seems to have become a quasi ham-radio system for some of the operators. I'll describe one experience on this trip as a case in point.
    Camped in a remote location and as far as we could tell, we are the only people within 100km. I check the time and it is within the sked window so I power up the radio and can faintly hear the operator on channel 2, can't make myself heard at all. When he goes to channel 1 I get a better signal but the operator is not able to catch my location; all he can pick up is my callsign. He tells me he's switching to a different base so let's see if I can get a better signal there.
    I listen for a couple of minutes then realise he has of course switched to channel 2 with the change of base. I switch to channel 2 and sure enough have a 5x5 signal where I spend the next several minutes listening to a chat between the base operator and an old mate who is calling in from home. This chat covers such subjects as how he spilled some beetroot on the kitchen floor and had to clean it up, how he's booked in for a colonoscopy in a couple of weeks, whether or not he's been to the men's shed lately, real Grandpa Simpson stuff and fully engaged in by the base operator. This was the worst example but not by a wide margin. There was one operator who, when I heard his voice I knew it would be all business- location, intentions, no messages, weather if requested, clear. Just what I thought we had signed on for. Obviously it's a volunteer-run thing and a hobby for the operators but I'm wondering if perhaps it has deteriorated too far and if there are options out there that better serve the needs originally intended?

  2. #2
    p38arover's Avatar
    p38arover is offline Major part of the heart and soul of AULRO.com
    Administrator
    I'm here to help you!
    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    30,704
    Total Downloaded
    1.63 MB
    I suspect a satellite radio would be better these days.

    I don't have a vehicle-mounted HF rig (2m/70cm only). I struggle to get comms (on the ham bands) even from my home HF setup with a larger dipole antenna.

    I'm always amused by TV programmes and movies where people can get perfect comms from hand-held radios or the in-car radios. In the time I've had my 2m/70cm rig in the Rangie, I've managed only one contact via a repeater.
    Ron B.
    VK2OTC

    2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
    2007 Yamaha XJR1300
    Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA



    RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Queensland
    Posts
    3,434
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I have been with VKS737 for 20 years and happy with the service they provide. Perhaps you should have called in with "breaker breaker" and see what happens.
    Before that I was with Flying Doctor Outpost Radio. but it is just for emergencies not just calling in with position reports etc.
    Keith

  4. #4
    p38arover's Avatar
    p38arover is offline Major part of the heart and soul of AULRO.com
    Administrator
    I'm here to help you!
    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    30,704
    Total Downloaded
    1.63 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by p38arover View Post
    I suspect a satellite radio would be better these days.
    Having said that, watch the video in this thread and hear about the issues of comms with their sat phones.

    Ron B.
    VK2OTC

    2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
    2007 Yamaha XJR1300
    Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA



    RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Drouin East, Vic
    Posts
    2,780
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Valid points about having redundancy in comms for emergencies. I'm thinking perhaps I'll keep the HF just for emergencies and not bother with logging position, receiving messages etc., as that has become a bit of a frustration.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Back down the hill.
    Posts
    29,768
    Total Downloaded
    0
    My experience with sat phones was that reception was akin to vodafail, beyond the CBD.
    How reliable are EPERBs?
    If you don't like trucks, stop buying stuff.
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/signaturepics/sigpic20865_1.gif

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    19,167
    Total Downloaded
    152.79 MB
    My OKA has a Codan. I haven't subbed to VKS737 as I haven't had the use for it yet. Currently I am wondering if a Starlink service might make it, and the satphone, redundant. As I have the Codan I might as well keep it.

    An EPIRB, on the other hand, would still be an almost essential item if solo, which I will be when I go. Some problems, such as an electrical fire, or other total loss of the vehicle, would render the HF, Starlink, and possibly the satphone ( charging ), useless.
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    Cancer is gender blind.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Drouin East, Vic
    Posts
    2,780
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I think you would be looking at a PLB rather than an EPIRB. As I understand it they transmit on a radio frequency that is monitored by commercial aircraft as well as by satellite. Line of sight from airline routes at 40,000ft would surely cover all of Aus?

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    19,167
    Total Downloaded
    152.79 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by POD View Post
    I think you would be looking at a PLB rather than an EPIRB. As I understand it they transmit on a radio frequency that is monitored by commercial aircraft as well as by satellite. Line of sight from airline routes at 40,000ft would surely cover all of Aus?
    Well, yes. My mistake, as EPIRB has become a little generic. EPIRB is more for marine applications. However I believe they work just fine for remote touring, have double the transmit time, but are far larger and heavier making them unsuitable for bush walking.

    PLB would be the logical choice for our purposes though.
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    Cancer is gender blind.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane, Queensland
    Posts
    5,778
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I did the Kokoda track recently and used a Garmin Inreach Mini to send location and short messages back to Australia. It can connect to your phone to make texting easier.

    It was so light and small, and worked perfectly in PNG.
    L322 tdv8 poverty pack - wow
    Perentie 110 wagon ARN 49-107 (probably selling) turbo, p/steer, RFSV front axle/trutrack, HF, gullwing windows, double jerrys etc.
    Perentie 110 wagon ARN 48-699 another project
    Track Trailer ARN 200-117
    REMLR # 137

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!