Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: Digital Cameras

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Martinsville, gateway to the Watagans!
    Posts
    360
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Digital Cameras

    Hi all,

    I'm looking at buying myself a digital camera and was wondering if anyone had some recommendations? I currently run a Nikon N60 SLR which I absolutely adore, except I cant delete photographs that I dont like, and I feel like I'm changing film every ten seconds. I'm interested in things above 5x optical zoom, I dont want to have to stand in whatever I'm stuck in to take a good piccy. I am querying what you folks use and how you're feeling about them, brand or make, I'm not that much phased. And please, if you quote me things that're over a 500 budget I'll cry, that's a lot on my wages!

    <Notes: This message has been typo repaired.>

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Close enough to their Shire to smell the dirty Hobbit feet
    Posts
    8,059
    Total Downloaded
    0
    For you two get an elcheapo that way when the Rocky gets sunk, flooded bounced, etc.. you won't worry too much. The one I have cost me $150.00 off ebay no name brand no optical zoom, but a 6x digital zoom and 8.0mp

    When it breaks I'll take out the card and batteries and get a decent 35mm SLR

    Or get a camcorder, you can take digital images from tape, and they cost hardly anything for a basic model nowadays

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Martinsville, gateway to the Watagans!
    Posts
    360
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hah, I was going to mount it on the roof inside. That way I have to drown before it gets ruined!

  4. #4
    p38arover's Avatar
    p38arover is offline Major part of the heart and soul of AULRO.com
    Administrator
    I'm here to help you!
    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    30,707
    Total Downloaded
    1.63 MB
    I've got two. A Nikon Coolpix 2500 - great little camera which, because of the tilting lens, doesn't have a viewfinder. This is a real problem in bright light. You cannot see what you are photographing.

    It has excellent macro capability, e.g., this pic of a the guts of a P38A belnd motor:



    I also have a Fuji FinePix S5500 with both view finder and and a screen. Not a bad camera with x10 optical zoom but the close-up capability is nothing to write home about.

    I wish I'd spent the equivalent amount on a digital SLR.

    Ron
    Ron B.
    VK2OTC

    2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
    2007 Yamaha XJR1300
    Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA



    RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

  5. #5
    numpty's Avatar
    numpty is offline TopicToaster Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Nundle
    Posts
    4,077
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by p38arover
    I also have a Fuji FinePix S5500 with both view finder and and a screen. Not a bad camera with x10 optical zoom but the close-up capability is nothing to write home about.

    Ron
    I also have a Fuji Finepix...I think its a fantastic camera and everyone always comments on the quality of the pics taken with it. I like the eye piece as opposed to the screen when taking pics. I don't find the close up so bad...are you using the correct macro setting? I like to take pics of flowers and don't find it a problem at all...at least as good as my old SLR with extension rings was.

    Numpty's Missus
    Numpty

    Thomas - 1955 Series 1 107" Truck Cab
    Leon - 1957 Series 1 88" Soft Top
    Lewis - 1963 Series 11A ex Mil Gunbuggy
    Teddy5 - 2001 Ex Telstra Big Cab Td5
    ​Betsy - 1963 Series 11A ex Mil GS
    REMLR No 143

  6. #6
    dmdigital's Avatar
    dmdigital is offline OldBushie Vendor

    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Arnhem Land, NT
    Posts
    8,492
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If you're already a Nikon person then I'd stick with them. I must say though it seems using a Nikon SLR is like driving a Landy. Do Canon owner's drive Cruisers or something they have the same attitude? Anyway I digress...

    One thing that Nikon has in the Coolpix and DSLR range is cominality of use menu's are all the same style, buttons tend to be in like places etc.

    You're better off getting a camera with a viewfinder as well as the LCD (as mentioned sunlight is an issue on LCD's). Best review sites are dpreview and steves digicams. Remember to allow extra for a good size card, range you are talking about is almost all SD nowdays but shooting 6MB + photos will use space on a trip so budget for a 512MB or better card - It is always best to shoot at high resolution so you can print enlargements, edit etc. SD cards are by far the most afordable, you'll find Fuji and Olympus use XD which are slightly more expensive and then there's Sony with their proprietry Memory Stick. For editing software get a copy of Adobe Photoshop Elements 5.0 - Shop around and get the academic version and save money.
    MY15 Discovery 4 SE SDV6

    Past: 97 D1 Tdi, 03 D2a Td5, 08 Kimberley Kamper, 08 Defender 110 TDCi, 99 Defender 110 300Tdi[/SIZE]

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Why not get a Nikon Digital SLR and be able to use your current lenses - prices start about $900.

    Gazzz
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  8. #8
    p38arover's Avatar
    p38arover is offline Major part of the heart and soul of AULRO.com
    Administrator
    I'm here to help you!
    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    30,707
    Total Downloaded
    1.63 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol
    Why not get a Nikon Digital SLR and be able to use your current lenses - prices start about $900.
    That's why I'm looking at a Pentax DSLR.

    One problem I find with my Fuji is that I'm left-eye dominant so I put the view finder uo to my left eye. "So what?", you ask. Well, the camera controls for most smaller cameras are set up for right-eye dominant users. The viewfinders aren't central like they are on SLRs, they're offset to one side.

    I can't reach the controls on the back of the camera becasue my face is in the way. Put the camera up to each eye in turn and you'll see what I mean.

    One thing I do like about the Fuji is that the eyepiece can be adjusted so the image is focussed when not wearing glasses (I have one long-sighted eye, one short-sighted eye). I don't need a correction lens like I do with my Pentax SLRs.

    Ron
    Ron B.
    VK2OTC

    2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
    2007 Yamaha XJR1300
    Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA



    RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

  9. #9
    p38arover's Avatar
    p38arover is offline Major part of the heart and soul of AULRO.com
    Administrator
    I'm here to help you!
    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    30,707
    Total Downloaded
    1.63 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by numpty
    I don't find the close up so bad...are you using the correct macro setting? I like to take pics of flowers and don't find it a problem at all...at least as good as my old SLR with extension rings was.
    Yes, I use macro mode but it's not in the same class as the Nikon - and that's why I didn't sell the Nikon when I bought the Fuji.

    Ron
    Ron B.
    VK2OTC

    2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
    2007 Yamaha XJR1300
    Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA



    RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    now near Lithgow, centre of the Universe.
    Posts
    1,152
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Something to consider at the budget end of the market is batteries and battery life. Lots of the cheaper digitals run on AA batteries that would have a very limited life. You could get a charger and a set of rechargeable AA's but that's a pain imo. I'd suggest you look at cameras that have a L-ion battery that's good for days (weeks?) of use.
    I've just got an Olympus micro(mu)digital 600 and am still coming to terms with it, but overall I'm impressed. It's case is "weatherproof" which provides some protection and it removes its own lenscap, which is great. I also like it when it says I have room for another 903 photos at 1600x1200.
    I agree with the comments about memory cards - although they all seem reasonably priced.
    Also agree about an LCD in bright light - most of the time on Stockton beach I couldn't see what I was pointing at. A viewfinder would have been handy.
    Depending on what your going to use the camera for I wouldn't obsess about the megapixels - if you are going to email a lot of them or post them to a forum you'll spend a lot of time reducing the image size anyway.
    Optical zoom is useful - digital zoom is irrelevant.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!