Thread: Call me stupid but Im going to ask again

You're stupid.

Now that I've obeyed your thread title, I would say that you should be fine with the -25 offset... I am not however, suitably qualified to say for certain, I'll leave that up to those more knowledgable.

Not much help, am I??

Why not make a trip (or even give them a call) to LRA?? I'm not affiliated with them at all, but I know they sell offset rims there, and I'd say they've probably dealt with the issue before.

Well I asked for it, Thanks for your help

Originally Posted by karljanz

My problem is that I have found 2 websites that say different things,
The first says that a 1994 disco has a standard offset of -30 and the other says + 30

The offset is stamped on the Disco rims. Go and look at them.

It is +33mm.

Disco one rims are +33mm offset. Going to -25 will result in a movement of 58mm making your track 116 mm wider.

Just make sure that the -25 is either absolute or relative. Relative will result in a movement of -25mm resulting in a +8mm offset, this will result in a 50mm wider track.

yes neg25 offset will work a treat i miss mine now

Ok your stupid but so am I, as I am trying to get this sorted out in my head so I dont bugger up.

do we need to get wheels that have had a -25mm off set done to them from standard setting or do we get them set to -25mm off set?

from what I am reading here it is 2 completely different things?

Blythe

I believe the dynamica rims with -25 offset are the go (not sure if these are absolute or relative). I think these are what Boxer used and are what I will be chasing down as soon as I get some coin. $140ea here in the west.

A quick search makes me think absolute is the go:
http://www.aulro.com/afvb/discovery-...ml#post1031954
http://www.aulro.com/afvb/discovery-...ml#post1001304

i had a good pic to explane but carnt find it i have posted it a few times tho