Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 18 of 18

Thread: Free wheeling hubs

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    St Helena,Melbourne
    Posts
    16,773
    Total Downloaded
    1.13 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by BigJon View Post
    So you unlock the front hubs, then don't move as all the drive disappears out the front... I can't see that improving economy.
    It would, you dont use fuel if you cant move .
    MY08 TDV6 SE D3- permagrin ooh yeah
    2004 Jayco Freedom tin tent
    1998 Triumph Daytona T595
    1974 VW Kombi bus
    1958 Holden FC special sedan

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by loanrangie View Post
    It would, you dont use fuel if you cant move .
    It would waste fuel as you'd be doing thousands of RPM and not getting anywhere. You'd be somewhere in the realm of 999.9L/100km.

    As for the FW hubs, if you did have a Santana selectable gearset in your D1 transfer, the money you save in fuel, would be far exceeded in the original cost of the Santana gearset and the increased wear of the front prop shaft and unlubricated swivel pins.

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  3. #13
    p38arover's Avatar
    p38arover is online now Major part of the heart and soul of AULRO.com
    Administrator
    I'm here to help you!
    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    30,707
    Total Downloaded
    1.63 MB
    There is, or was, a conversion kit available from a 4WD place in Adelaide. I wouldn't waste my money on one.
    Ron B.
    VK2OTC

    2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
    2007 Yamaha XJR1300
    Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA



    RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    123
    Total Downloaded
    0
    You would need to modify the transfer case to prevent the front drive.
    This is what they do on the 80 series l`cruisers, couples with manual locking hubs.
    It does reduce wear on the front three, but that's about it.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide - Torrens Park
    Posts
    7,291
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by shamat View Post
    It does reduce wear on the front three, but that's about it.

    The front three what? I would suggest that it might reduce some types of wear, but increase other types.

    Any modification of this sort done to "improve fuel economy" would cost so much and any improvements made would be so small that the payback period would be measured in 100s of thousands of km traveled or decades in time.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Patterson Lakes
    Posts
    173
    Total Downloaded
    0
    A mate of mine did it to his 80 series 6 cyl petro., cost $1200 about 8 years ago and improved the economy by 2lts / 100kms.
    @$1.50 / litre that is $3 / 100km or $30 / 1000km.
    Payback 40000km.
    Positives, it steered easier and straighter (no more wander).
    IMHO I wouldn't waste my time.

  7. #17
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is offline RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,521
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by SLOWBOAT View Post
    A mate of mine did it to his 80 series 6 cyl petro., cost $1200 about 8 years ago and improved the economy by 2lts / 100kms.
    @$1.50 / litre that is $3 / 100km or $30 / 1000km.
    Payback 40000km.
    Positives, it steered easier and straighter (no more wander).
    IMHO I wouldn't waste my time.
    Eight years ago the petrol price was not that high, and today the cost would probably be a lot higher, so the payout time wouold be a lot longer. Having run my Series Landrover with and without the hubs engaged, I could not measure the difference in fuel consumption, so I do wonder how accurate the 2l/100km is.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  8. #18
    p38arover's Avatar
    p38arover is online now Major part of the heart and soul of AULRO.com
    Administrator
    I'm here to help you!
    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    30,707
    Total Downloaded
    1.63 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by JDNSW View Post
    I do wonder how accurate the 2l/100km is.
    Placebo effect?

    Or what other factors were at play. When I had the roof rack on the P38A, my fuel consumption increased by 10% or 2l/100km.
    Ron B.
    VK2OTC

    2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
    2007 Yamaha XJR1300
    Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA



    RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!