You are dreaming.
And all things being equal you will have a 6% economy loss.
( Ethanol has 60% of petrol calorific value x10% =6%)
Regards Philip A
I usually run my 2003 V8 on Standard unleaded because the performance/economy difference of premium I find is not worth the extra cost.
I emailed the guys at MR Auto & asked if E10 would be OK to use.
They said it would, so coming home from the Sunny coast the other day I stopped at a BP & decided to give the E10 a go.
Well the difference is very noticable.
The engine seems to deliver power much more smoothly. The gear changes are smoother & the auto is locking up at about 50Km/hr insted of 60 ish.
So far I'm pleasantly surprised.
I haven't filled up again yet so the economy difference, if any, is still an unknown factor.
Anyone else had similar experience or am I dreamin'![]()
You are dreaming.
And all things being equal you will have a 6% economy loss.
( Ethanol has 60% of petrol calorific value x10% =6%)
Regards Philip A
I think you are dreamin - you should have slightly lower power and slightly increased fuel consumption.
There should be no other issues or benefits.
Garry
REMLR 243
2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
1977 FC 101
1976 Jaguar XJ12C
1973 Haflinger AP700
1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
1957 Series 1 88"
1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon
Placebo effect
Feels smoother because its making less power
I agree, E10 is not better and gives worse economy.
I run only BP Unltimate unless I have no choice and then I still try to get atleast standard 95 Premium.
Thanks for the comments folks.
I guess I'll continue the live the dream until the next fill up![]()
You pumped hi octane by mistake![]()
Lucky it wasn't the d pump,:Just jokes( know a bloke who did that.
I agree with most of what Cannon has experienced.
I run E10 in my 01 V8 D2 and it does run better.
The Bosch Motronics allows more ignition advance with E10 than if I run the junk unleaded.
The vehicle drives and accelerates better. (as expected with advanced ignition timing)...........Yes. I have proved it using Rovacom in real time tests.
Fuel economy is as one would expect a 2 ton petrol V8 to be.
Cost saving is about zero. Even when E10 is cheaper than unleaded.
As posted previously, there are less calories in a litre of E10 than a litre of unleaded. Therefore more E10 must be burned for the same power output. But the engine efficiency improves with more advance than what is allowed when running low octane fuel.............................................. ................
Let the endless ethanol debate continue.
Back in the real world, my vehicle is noticeably more responsive, but with no financial benefit.
I keep the tank near full, and it does not sit idle for long periods. So far, no problems running ethanol.
I am not to sure if this is correct or not.
However what i have been told with Ethanol fuel in Australia is that it is sugar cane based which does not burn as cleanly as the Ethanol fuel in the US which is wheat based.????
Might just be someone making things up, but I would have thought that ethanol being alcohol would burn better.
As I mentioned earlier though I just use 98 Octane.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks