Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 25

Thread: Is the "Performance Chip" for the Rover V8 a Myth?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Perth WA
    Posts
    779
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by LOVEMYRANGIE View Post
    Not so grasshopper!!

    There are a number of chip options for a 14CUX system. The best one is probably the Tornado.
    Have a look at the RPI website www.v8engines.com

    Search www.rangerovers.net

    Google is your friend with
    "tornado systems"
    "Mark Adams tornado"
    "14cux chip"

    Cheers

    Andrew


    Sent from my mobile stone using smoke signals!!
    No question there are chips out there
    but unless the engine has accompanying ign and intake/exhaust mods the gains will be minimal at best.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Kootingal
    Posts
    464
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Is it possible to turn a distributer to an electric system?

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kingston, Tassie, OZ.
    Posts
    13,728
    Total Downloaded
    0
    In my opinion, our low comp (8.13:1) engines are NEVER going to be efficient. Period.

    With hi compression ( 9.35:1) pistons, and a tornado chip with a new EFI cam and lifters, port matching and a free flowing exhaust will be about the best you can achieve. This is relevant to 3.5, 3.9, 4.6 etc etc fitted with 14CUX .

    JC

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Northern Windowlickersville WA
    Posts
    3,403
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by justinc View Post
    In my opinion, our low comp (8.13:1) engines are NEVER going to be efficient. Period.

    With hi compression ( 9.35:1) pistons, and a tornado chip with a new EFI cam and lifters, port matching and a free flowing exhaust will be about the best you can achieve. This is relevant to 3.5, 3.9, 4.6 etc etc fitted with 14CUX .

    JC
    RPI got 500HP out of a 5.2L stroker 4.6 block, not too shabby if I say so myself!


    Sent from my mobile tellingbone using rock carvings.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Avoca Beach
    Posts
    14,152
    Total Downloaded
    0
    All the above is why a piggyback chip is a good solution for a V8 with 14CUX.

    The piggybacks available such as Unichip and Haltech have an ignition mapping section which takes over the vacuum advance and could takeover the centrifugal advance if any seller/dyno was keen enough.

    The problem of course is how much dyno time is acceptable for you to pay for. However if you use someone experienced in tuning the V8 you get some of the benefit of their experience tuning other V8s.

    The Australian 14CUX low comp is termed"rest of the World" and was tuned to run on AFAIK 89 octane or less and there are big gains to be made with advance.

    Mine now has 50% more "Tractive effort" with a Thor, head mods, exhaust etc, but even only with the chip there was a 15-20% improvement below and above 3000RPM where there was only 5%. AND it is REALLY noticable eg mine would not climb the hill north from the harbour bridge at constant speed without kicking down. After the piggyback it flew up.

    So to me a piggyback ECU is well worth it and achieves in practice most of the gains of a new chip with the exception that the upper limit on injector duty cannot be changed so if you fit a big capacity motor you need a Powerchip or similar.
    Regards Philip A

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Avoca Beach
    Posts
    14,152
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I note the original poster was referring to a D2.
    These all have Motronic which is a completely different proposition.
    AFAIK Motronic stays at 14.7:1 the whole time for emission compliance, even at WOT.
    The Motronic has an extensive timing map tailored to the market it is for ( or the fuel available), however the Australian cars are again "rest of World" so there could be gains to be had from more advance. There seems to be very few Motronic tuners in Australia and Mark Adams in the UK seems to be the most respected for Rover V8.

    I hear there are not great gains to be had like on a 14CUX but there are some and 8% is the sort of figure I recall, but I may be wrong. This is using a chip or flash tune.

    Trouble is that for Motronic on say a BMW M3 which I have seen chipped, all the gains are at 5500RPM up.
    Regards Philip A

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide - Torrens Park
    Posts
    7,291
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PhilipA View Post


    you need a Powerchip .

    Regards Philip A
    I would not recommend one of those, based on a lot of forum talk (many different forums) about how bad the chips and the company CEO are.

    Google is your friend.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Avoca Beach
    Posts
    14,152
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Doh
    I am sure that was a joke wherever you found it. I didn't feel like looking up teh Rpi site.
    Regards Philip

    AAh, what I meant to say was TORNADO chip or similar,. There is another Mark Adams chip that Rpi also sells called Optimax.
    Last edited by PhilipA; 6th January 2011 at 09:53 AM. Reason: correction

  9. #19
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Adelaide
    Posts
    399
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Anyone have any experience with this offering

    Welcome to Syntek

    "These are not simply an add-in chip but a complete retune of the fuel maps and ignition timing (where applicable) for maximum efficiency using modern fuels and real world conditions."

    Seems they do 3.9 and TD5 but not sure about D2.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    470
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Syntek are from Briizzy and have been offering 3.5/3.9 L or 13/14CUX V8 chips for about 2 years now. Their prices are on par with Mark Adams/Tornado. They also do a complete ECU board swap out that will also do away with mechanical advance as Traco mentions. Interestingly their ECU board can take MAP inputs instead of MAF. I have not heard of any feedback.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!