Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 49

Thread: hydrogen

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Vic
    Posts
    342
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Pinelli View Post
    Bigger problem with hydrogen is making sure the car doesn't go bang if something goes wrong.

    Brisbane City has just grounded half of its bus fleet (>500 buses) because an LNG tank exploded today. No one hurt luckily, it was just sitting in the depot, but it did damage two buses. Hydrogen is much worse.

    They are working on developing 'sponges', made out of palladium and other materials that can store hydrogen quite densely, and yet safely in case of an accident.

    Switzerland used to run a fleet of buses using flywheel technology. Plug them in overnight while a motor spun them up, unplug them for the day, and drive around, converting rotational kinetic energy to electric energy and back to kinetic again.

    Again, big problem in an accident because if those flywheels let loose, they're storing an awfully large amount of energy in them and they can go flying.
    Actually Hydrogen is a lot safer than CNG or LPG as both are heavier than air and sit close to the ground when they escape, Hydrogen is lighter than air and evaporates rather fast almost eliminating the chance of accidental ignition as long as basic safety precautions are taken.

    They use this sort of thing for storing Acetylene already so it's nothing new.

    That would have to hold a lot of rotational kenetic energy to run a bus all day.

    Cheers Casper

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    3,916
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Casper View Post
    Actually Hydrogen is a lot safer than CNG or LPG as both are heavier than air and sit close to the ground when they escape, Hydrogen is lighter than air and evaporates rather fast almost eliminating the chance of accidental ignition as long as basic safety precautions are taken.
    The relative safety of one vs the other I don't want to comment on, just because something is hazardous does not mean it can't be managed safely.

    However, Hydrogen has just about the lowest ignition energy of any commonly available gas or vapour (10x less than light hydrocarbons) and it ignites explosively over just about the widest air / fuel mixture of any commonly available gas or vapour.

    ~ 4 - 75% (hydrogen)
    ~ 2 - 10% (light hydro carbon gases)
    ~ 1.5 -7.5% (petrol)

    Backyard plumbers be advised.
    2024 RRS on the road
    2011 D4 3.0 in the drive way
    1999 D2 V8, in heaven
    1984 RRC, in hell

  3. #23
    seriesLR Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by greg smith View Post
    has anyone tried the hydrogen generator on a td5? was looking at one today and given the spiel BUT is it ok to use on the landrover system. I have a discotd5 2002,,,????
    Hey Greg,
    In a nut shell HHO generators do work when done right and don't work when done cheap.
    I've worked in the petroleum industry for over 15 years, my last consulting assignment was for a alternate fuel manufacturer. In this case I designed and developed several options for my customer that they intend to fit to utes/light trucks imported from Asia.

    Here are some key points to remember when talking HHO generators.
    - efficency is the key! The Dry Cell you use needs to use as little amps per litre of gas produced as possible. Heat plays a big part here as well as plate materials and assembly of the unit.
    - You will need a pulse width modulator (PWM) with two amperage settings and the input to change between them automatically based on city or hwy driving. Best MPG is normally on the Hwy.
    - the PWM only needs 40amp MAX. Any more is a waste.
    - You need to use a gas scrubber/bubbler, this cleans the gas of any foaming produced in the cell and keeps your engine safe from corrosion.
    - If your vehicle is EFI then it will use lambda (O2) sensors, most newer cars have a Lambda sensor on the intake and in the exhaust. you will need to be able to change the signal these sensors send to the ECU other wise you will definitely use more fuel as the sensors read a low O2 level in the intake air fuel mixture and change the amount of fuel to compensate, as a result you push your foot further down to get more power.
    - For safety I strongly recommend installing a vacuum actuated switch, these switches are attached in a vacuum line on the engine once a vacuum is drawn across the switch it turns the unit on. So if the engine isn't running the HHO doesn't flow.

    DO NOT buy a off the shelf unit I've tested dozens from over the globe half are garbage and the other half do a little, but none managed to perform as advertised for me.
    In the end I built an option that does work quite effectively, however I built the PWM and the cell from scratch, I also used a aftermarket ECU and injection controller with a module that I also made to read the engine input/outputs going to and from the sensors and PWM for amp control.
    I also substituted the power consumption issue with flexiable solar panels mounted to the roof and bonnet of the car.

    As much as I'd like to "prove it" with the years of R&D documentation, plans, schematics, photos, videos etc. etc. I can't.
    As I said earlier I work for petroleum companies and was paid very well to keep my mouth shut about specifics plus if I didn't I be in breach of confidentiality agreements.

    When the statute of limitations runs out I'll be the first one to tell what I know.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Springwood
    Posts
    161
    Total Downloaded
    0
    - If your vehicle is EFI then it will use lambda (O2) sensors, most newer cars have a Lambda sensor on the intake and in the exhaust. you will need to be able to change the signal these sensors send to the ECU other wise you will definitely use more fuel as the sensors read a low O2 level in the intake air fuel mixture and change the amount of fuel to compensate, as a result you push your foot further down to get more power
    What vehicle uses Lambda sensors in the intake?
    Why would they? ..... I'm nervous.

    How does it measure a "low O2 level in the intake air fuel mixture"?

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Alstonville NSW
    Posts
    469
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Catmatt View Post
    Ahemm - isn't that Methane and not odourless Hydrogen
    If only methane, but me thinks there are contaminant compounds produced by those pesky microbes from the high sulphur content of the said diet and various additives.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Caloundra
    Posts
    870
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If you're interested in the flywheel buses, have a look in wikipedia under Gyrobus.

    And to compare, I have done flywheel calculations in the past, but I'm too lazy tonight, so I found an online calculator (Flywheel Energy Calculator). A ring wheel is much more efficient, as the mass is concentrated at the edge of the ring, think of a bicycle wheel.

    Anyway, a 100kg ring flywheel, with a diameter of 1m, spinning at 50000rpm has the same energy content of ~10L diesel (if I'm using the calc right). How would you feel about having one of those in your boot, spinning away?

    Discussions regarding various efficiencies of diesel/electric generators etc can ensue or not, I'm watching the tennis.

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    32
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Hi SeriesLR,

    "In a nut shell HHO generators do work when done right"

    Compared to? Tennis ball under accelerator pedal?
    If really good, anybody got a waterboard?

    Back to baked beans gas plumbing - I'm sure I read somewhere that an aftermarket kit had been developed for Toyota's Pre-arse!

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,495
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Couldv'e saved yourself a lot of typing.

    Quote Originally Posted by seriesLR View Post
    Hey Greg,
    In a nut shell HHO generators do work when done right

    As much as I'd like to "prove it" with the years of R&D documentation, plans, schematics, photos, videos etc. etc. I can't.
    that'll do.

    super summation.

    Yes Hydrogen fumigation on an engine works and makes it run more effeciently in the same way that LPG fumigation does (more or less)

    No having the engine that your running from the fumigation provide the power to split water into HHO and then plumbing that into the engine wont work. Basic rules of the Game of entropy. Heres the rules

    1. you can never win, the very best you can hope for is to break even.
    2. You must play.
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    32
    Total Downloaded
    0
    3. You can enjoy eating both the baked beans and the resulting emissions.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Coogee NSW
    Posts
    545
    Total Downloaded
    0
    4. you can watch these videos and ponder the future.

    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-QA2rkpBSY]The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See (part 1 of 8) - YouTube[/ame]

    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FDjObEJy-hM&feature=related]Collapse (2009) - YouTube[/ame]

    enjoy

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!