Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: Suspension rebound - is this normal?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Slunnie View Post
    The bump valving relates more to comfort as it bring the harshness through to the body. You can increase the rebound rate and still have a comfortable ride because the reaction happens between/across the spring/shocks.
    Basic rule of thumb is bump controls unsprung rate, rebound controls the chassis which is why Bilstein generally, or at least with their HD valving have bucket loads of low speed rebound on live axle 4x4's.
    Unfortunately it produces one hell of a jiggly ride.

    A number of damper manufacturers still reduce low speed rebound though as it does make the ride plusher but yes, generally speaking bump affects the perceived ride more when hitting a bump.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Slunnie View Post
    It's more a shock problem than a spring problem. You will find that the oscillations are smaller with stiffer springs, but I wouldn't pursuit that avenue just yet. If the shocks are right to start with it will eliminate the problem.
    Yep agreed, just trying to point out if RS doesn't know the spring rate (original and current kings) then no good taking a punt on a 3rd unknown spring rate.

    Knowing the spring rate could also help tune the shock to suit.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,147
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    I stand by what I've said. Here are Bilstein valving, I dont think they normally do bullnose curves for the road.

    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,147
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    Yep agreed, just trying to point out if RS doesn't know the spring rate (original and current kings) then no good taking a punt on a 3rd unknown spring rate.

    Knowing the spring rate could also help tune the shock to suit.
    I had a set tested years ago, I think they were something around 240-270 or 240-300lb/in. I'm not sure what length the transition occurred though. The King Springs are at(were?) right at the soft end of the range for lifted springs on a Disco2.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Slunnie View Post
    It's more a shock problem than a spring problem. You will find that the oscillations are smaller with stiffer springs, but I wouldn't pursuit that avenue just yet. If the shocks are right to start with it will eliminate the problem.
    Stiffer springs make the oscillations smaller, but faster.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    FNQ - Yungaburra
    Posts
    237
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Unsure of the spring rate, Kings don't seem to carry the info on their site they are KRRR04, but from what I can tell they offer a KRRR04 HD if you are carrying 300 - 500kg's constantly.

    This may be useful when I have the kids and trailer loaded (approx. once a year). Not overly concerned about a more harsh ride when I am by myself as I was used to driving lowered vehicles before the discovery, but don't want to trash the ride in the process.

    The next question is what are the things I should be looking for for a less bouncy ride at lower speeds?

    In what circumstances is a bouncy ride at lower speeds good, ie when I head off road?

    If I have to replace some components just trying to make sure I do it once and try and achieve the mid range between harsh ride for towing, but not bouncy at low speeds.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Slunnie View Post
    I stand by what I've said. Here are Bilstein valving, I dont think they normally do bullnose curves for the road.


    Yours are custom, I can tell you that off the shelf HD Bilstein valving is jiggly, their off the shelf comfort valving uses a lot less low speed bump than the off the shelf HD valving.

    You don't need a significant knee in the graph to achieve this, just less in that 0-4" sec range.
    On most dampers it's just a case of opening the bleed a little.

    If you graphed the OP's dampers, the rebound curve (the bottom line) would start from the 0/X axis at around the 50-100mm/sec mark, ramp up a little and then probably be fairly linear too.

    I agree, it's all a damper/shock valving thing and any decent aftermarket damper that's valved specifically for a DII, eg. Bilstein, Koni, Delphi-de Carbon, whatever Ultimate Suspension sell, etc would be an improvement.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Slunnie View Post
    I stand by what I've said. Here are Bilstein valving, I dont think they normally do bullnose curves for the road.

    Thanks for the plot, do you know which bilstein valving numbers it is for?

    I plan to build a shock dyno eventually. So force/velocity numbers on a plot like that are extremely helpful.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    NSW far north coast
    Posts
    17,285
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Dougal View Post
    Thanks for the plot, do you know which bilstein valving numbers it is for?

    I plan to build a shock dyno eventually. So force/velocity numbers on a plot like that are extremely helpful.
    I helped heavily modify and rebuild the original BMC/Leyland/JRA dyno that dated back to the fifties so that we could plot and rebuild race dampers.

    It was really interesting that it was all setup to measure medium/high speed shaft speeds, it just couldn't go low enough to do the critical low speed stuff, my mate Mark reversed the pulley drives around so we could get decent low speeds, I added a 3 phase variable speed drive, (10hp three phase motor) supplied and installed an LVDT, etc.

    The original was an all mechanical plot on graph paper doing a displacement/force graph, the classic D shaped Koni graph.

    It was a monster of a thing, god knows how heavy it was, but it was big enough to do fatigue cycle chassis twist testing on Perentie 6x6 chassis when the ADF was having chassis cracking problems in the mid/late nineties !

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kiwiland
    Posts
    7,246
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by rick130 View Post
    I helped heavily modify and rebuild the original BMC/Leyland/JRA dyno that dated back to the fifties so that we could plot and rebuild race dampers.

    It was really interesting that it was all setup to measure medium/high speed shaft speeds, it just couldn't go low enough to do the critical low speed stuff, my mate Mark reversed the pulley drives around so we could get decent low speeds, I added a 3 phase variable speed drive, (10hp three phase motor) supplied and installed an LVDT, etc.

    The original was an all mechanical plot on graph paper doing a displacement/force graph, the classic D shaped Koni graph.

    It was a monster of a thing, god knows how heavy it was, but it was big enough to do fatigue cycle chassis twist testing on Perentie 6x6 chassis when the ADF was having chassis cracking problems in the mid/late nineties !
    Sounds like a beast. I'm looking for the other end of the scale.

    Thinking 2kw single phase and portable. Intended for bike forks/shocks with up to 50mm stroke but hopefully will be able to handle a landrover shock at limited speed.
    I should be able to do it with a gear-motor, crank, load-cell, linear potentiometer and arduino writing to an SD card. I've got an electrical engineering student keen to do the coding. I hate coding. Linear pot, load-cell and arduino are sitting here in boxes.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!