Basic rule of thumb is bump controls unsprung rate, rebound controls the chassis which is why Bilstein generally, or at least with their HD valving have bucket loads of low speed rebound on live axle 4x4's.
Unfortunately it produces one hell of a jiggly ride.
A number of damper manufacturers still reduce low speed rebound though as it does make the ride plusher but yes, generally speaking bump affects the perceived ride more when hitting a bump.
I stand by what I've said. Here are Bilstein valving, I dont think they normally do bullnose curves for the road.
![]()
Cheers
Slunnie
~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~
Cheers
Slunnie
~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~
Unsure of the spring rate, Kings don't seem to carry the info on their site they are KRRR04, but from what I can tell they offer a KRRR04 HD if you are carrying 300 - 500kg's constantly.
This may be useful when I have the kids and trailer loaded (approx. once a year). Not overly concerned about a more harsh ride when I am by myself as I was used to driving lowered vehicles before the discovery, but don't want to trash the ride in the process.
The next question is what are the things I should be looking for for a less bouncy ride at lower speeds?
In what circumstances is a bouncy ride at lower speeds good, ie when I head off road?
If I have to replace some components just trying to make sure I do it once and try and achieve the mid range between harsh ride for towing, but not bouncy at low speeds.
Yours are custom, I can tell you that off the shelf HD Bilstein valving is jiggly, their off the shelf comfort valving uses a lot less low speed bump than the off the shelf HD valving.
You don't need a significant knee in the graph to achieve this, just less in that 0-4" sec range.
On most dampers it's just a case of opening the bleed a little.
If you graphed the OP's dampers, the rebound curve (the bottom line) would start from the 0/X axis at around the 50-100mm/sec mark, ramp up a little and then probably be fairly linear too.
I agree, it's all a damper/shock valving thing and any decent aftermarket damper that's valved specifically for a DII, eg. Bilstein, Koni, Delphi-de Carbon, whatever Ultimate Suspension sell, etc would be an improvement.
I helped heavily modify and rebuild the original BMC/Leyland/JRA dyno that dated back to the fiftiesso that we could plot and rebuild race dampers.
It was really interesting that it was all setup to measure medium/high speed shaft speeds, it just couldn't go low enough to do the critical low speed stuff, my mate Mark reversed the pulley drives around so we could get decent low speeds, I added a 3 phase variable speed drive, (10hp three phase motor) supplied and installed an LVDT, etc.
The original was an all mechanical plot on graph paper doing a displacement/force graph, the classic D shaped Koni graph.
It was a monster of a thing, god knows how heavy it was, but it was big enough to do fatigue cycle chassis twist testing on Perentie 6x6 chassis when the ADF was having chassis cracking problems in the mid/late nineties !
Sounds like a beast. I'm looking for the other end of the scale.
Thinking 2kw single phase and portable. Intended for bike forks/shocks with up to 50mm stroke but hopefully will be able to handle a landrover shock at limited speed.
I should be able to do it with a gear-motor, crank, load-cell, linear potentiometer and arduino writing to an SD card. I've got an electrical engineering student keen to do the coding. I hate coding. Linear pot, load-cell and arduino are sitting here in boxes.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks