Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 58

Thread: TD5 viscous v electric, who's done it. what are the options?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    byron
    Posts
    136
    Total Downloaded
    0

    TD5 viscous v electric, who's done it. what are the options?

    Thanks again. Re: bleeder hose, Before i go buy it can anyone please tell me if I already have a good one?

    Cheers


  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Ferntree Gully, Vic
    Posts
    1,814
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by jezzarezza View Post
    Thanks again. Re: bleeder hose, Before i go buy it can anyone please tell me if I already have a good one?

    Cheers

    Nope that's the plastic one.. pain in the rear if it breaks.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    South Yundreup,WA.
    Posts
    7,468
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I would keep the viscous. However I have fitted 2 smaller Davies-Craig fans to the front of my radiator, can be done with minor mods. One is thermostatically set to cut in around 90 deg C and the second to come on with the air con.
    2011 Discovery 4 TDV6
    2009 DRZ400E Suzuki
    1956 & 1961 P4 Rover (project)
    1976 SS Torana (project - all cash donations or parts accepted)
    2003 WK Holden Statesman
    Departed
    2000 Defender Extreme: Shrek (but only to son)
    84 RR (Gone) 97 Tdi Disco (Gone)
    98 Ducati 900SS Gone & Missed

    Facta Non Verba

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    West Gippsland - Victoria
    Posts
    2,907
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by jezzarezza View Post
    Hey gang,

    ....................... put in an electric fan in place of the viscous on a TD5. Mine doesn't need doing at the moment, more of a preventative idea to make more reliable....................
    Cheers
    As others have said, DON'T DO IT, the TD5 viscous fan assembly is already efficient and reliable. Downgrading it to electric is definitely a backward step as it decreases air flow, increases complexity and puts additional strain on the alternator/electrical system.

    A couple of points though. Don't remove the fan shroud as this is important for efficiency and the viscous nut has a right hand thread





    Have a good look at the alloy aircon pipe as the rubber hose can actually wear through it where indicated. To help avoid this there should be a notch in the large diameter top hose which aligns with a 'rib' (on assembly) and helps to set a bit of a twist in the main hose lifting the smaller hose above the alloy air con pipe.

    Deano
    Attached Images Attached Images
    66 SIIA SWB .......73 SIII LWB diesel wgn
    86 RR 'classic'......99 Range Rover P38a
    94 Defender 110..95 Defender 130 Ute
    96 D1 300TDi.......99 D2 TD5 (current)
    04 D2a Td5..........02 Disco 2 V8

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,801
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Not sure how suitable an e.fan is for TD5 but benefits of thermo switched e.fan over belt driven:

    Faster warm up time

    Runs only when needed

    Can be mounted to rad to efficiently pull air through the rad without need for a huge fan and cowl.

    Cant throw a belt

    Can be turned off for water crossings

    Slight fuel/HP saving (negligable)

    Reliable

    ------

    I have experience with TDIs, mostly with standard belt driven fans but one with e.fan. The electric fan on the Defender was put on in 2010, a generic 180w rad fan off ebay - nothing special. Its still going strong and has been dunked and gunked numerous times. It runs off the x-eng switch kit which hasnt failed me either.

    These engines are water cooled and the e.fan does an excellent job of pulling air through the radiator when mounted right on the core. The factory belt driven fan moves more air, but then it has to in order pull air through the rad from distance.

    I know this forum is pro viscous, but my experience with the e.fan on the TDI over the past 8 years has been super positive. It has not threatened to over heat even on roasting hot days in low range and the fan has been 100% reliable with zero maintenance required.

    IME with the TDIs, overheating checks involve the viscous hub. But usually its rad condition, w.pump, coolant loss that leads to over heat - not the fan. The e.fan has never left me wondering, when it fires up I hear it, a dash light goes on and any upward motion on the temp guage is immediatly arrested.

    That said I have no plans to convert my other TDI to e.fan, there is no need for it.

  6. #16
    Tombie Guest

    TD5 viscous v electric, who's done it. what are the options?

    Cowlings provide a far superior flow than a surface contact eFan with a cowling.. almost in the order of twice the flow!

    You also have an intercooler that even when the fan isn’t engaged fully is helping draw air through.

    Comparing a low BMEP tdi to a high BMEP TD5 isn’t a comparison either - Tdi generates far less heat.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    byron
    Posts
    136
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Thanks again everyone. With all the don't do it's i'm starting to realise why I had trouble finding a thread. Manic, thanks for your input as well.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    byron
    Posts
    136
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tombie View Post
    www.samcosport.com/manufacturer/land-rover/

    Part TB-3051

    Not cheap but you’ll only do it once!

    Thanks again Tombie. Is that just the top hose? I scant seem to find a description, or photo/diagram on that link. Also, do you know if i'll be able to fit the shop/daves low coolant screw into it? I'm just about to pull the trigger on both

    cheers

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    byron
    Posts
    136
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by DeanoH View Post
    As others have said, DON'T DO IT, the TD5 viscous fan assembly is already efficient and reliable. Downgrading it to electric is definitely a backward step as it decreases air flow, increases complexity and puts additional strain on the alternator/electrical system.

    A couple of points though. Don't remove the fan shroud as this is important for efficiency and the viscous nut has a right hand thread





    Have a good look at the alloy aircon pipe as the rubber hose can actually wear through it where indicated. To help avoid this there should be a notch in the large diameter top hose which aligns with a 'rib' (on assembly) and helps to set a bit of a twist in the main hose lifting the smaller hose above the alloy air con pipe.

    Deano

    Cheers mate

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,801
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Tombie View Post
    Cowlings provide a far superior flow than a surface contact eFan with a cowling.. almost in the order of twice the flow!

    You also have an intercooler that even when the fan isn’t engaged fully is helping draw air through.

    Comparing a low BMEP tdi to a high BMEP TD5 isn’t a comparison either - Tdi generates far less heat.
    The way I see it these engines have radiators and cooling systems sized up for the engines requirements, but both pull air with a similar size fan+cowl set up, turning similar RPMs, pulling similar amounts of air through cores that are similar in thickness. A TD5 full width radiator would probably require two e.fans to effectively cover the surface area, where as the TDI only needs one on its smaller rad. So considering this, its possible a dual e.fan set up on the TD5 could give similar results to my single fan TDI set up.

    I would need to see data before completely accepting that a belt-fan+cowl actually draws twice the flow through the radiator than my e.fan set up. Considering my setup has been tested over many years in all types of conditions with a temp guage (vdo coolant, and CH surface sensor) plus over-temp alarm (that has never gone off), I'd be amazed if it was all achieved with only half the amount of airflow through the radiator. If that's the case, then the belt-fan is using twice as much power than it needs to (on a TDI) , hugely oversized.

    Its easy to see a belt-fan is capable of moving more air, its huge, but I'm not convinced the cowling set up is that efficient. For example, in the Puma Defenders there is a mod for the fan that moves it deeper into the cowling to improve its ability to pull air through the radiator. If I had a way of measuring, it would be interesting to compare the actual airflow pulled in from front of rad on my two setups, stock vs e.fan.

    Fair point on the intercooler, ideally you would prefer to have air pulled through the IC even at idle/low-speed/low-temps, which the belt-fan does. Although with gaps between the Rad/IC/Condenser, a good chunk of that draw would bypass the IC. Likely negligible effect on EGT/Performance.

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!