If the RF test fails with a working and programmed fob then the receiver or it's circuit is bad(provided te BCU is OK). The receiver is plug and play.
So, Nanocom today. Keys not detected. The codes were in there. Played for a bit, but nope. Disabled the security stuff so I can start the thing.... but, did the RF test and the keys were not detected, either of them.. New batteries in both.
So, does this suggest the receiver is dud? Also, could the security system be responsible for the flat battery? If I change the receiver do I need a Nanocom to sync it to the car?
I'd forgotten how much I love this car..
JayTee
Nullus Anxietus
Cancer is gender blind.
2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
OKApotamus #74
Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.
If the RF test fails with a working and programmed fob then the receiver or it's circuit is bad(provided te BCU is OK). The receiver is plug and play.
Discovery Td5 (2000), manual, tuned
Thank you, SF. I'm not sure how to test the BCU, but all of its other functions seemed to work on the Nanocom at least. I was able to test all of the lights etc. I was able to disable the immobilizer. But RF test failed on two keys. New receiver it is, but I don't think even Mario has them.
JayTee
Nullus Anxietus
Cancer is gender blind.
2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
OKApotamus #74
Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks