
Originally Posted by
Discosux
Thanks mate
I just want to clarify where I'm coming from for those that might be interested. I'm not the best at expressing thoughts.
- it's kind of been decided that there's no difference between the eu2 donk and the eu3 apart from..
-injector pressure
-injector rocker ratio
-injector angle (purely to correct contact / side load geometry due to higher rocker ratio. Not relevant)
All other things been equal - as in a rewire to bring the eu2 up to eu3 sensor spec <- this is the important bit
Assuming that the eu3 injectors are linear in their fuel delivery and that the eu2 injectors are also linear...
ie - 1ms = 1mg, 2 ms =2mg, 3ms=3mg (as an example)
There is only one parameter left to separate the two maps. The injector pulse width... (within reason, yes a shorter pulse will have more timing flexibility at extreme revs and the higher pressure will allow better atomisation of the fuel) So there will be a small? difference
I cant see going down this road causing major fuelling issues that couldn't be compensated for in the injector PW map.
If the injectors aren't linear in fuel / time then all bets are off, Ill go away. Though I'm pretty sure diesel cant be compressed, so in my head it should be linear, disregarding engagement times etc (separate tables, already compensated for)
I can understand why LR went with the original maps with their replacement NNN ecus for the eu2 spec motors, as rewiring the TPS and airbox sensor would be a PITA for the dealers, But why aren't the aftermarket Mapping suppliers offering it? It's not a big deal for backyard hacks to rewire a couple of sensors.
And yes - i'm just ****ed off because I cant get a decent ECU for a 99 manual TD5
Bookmarks