Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Hookes joint

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    3,916
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Hookes joint

    There has been a few posts on hookes joints in the last few weeks. I have had a strange intermitent vibration for a couple of weeks now, there seemed to be nothing consistent about it other than it seemed worse when the engine was under load going up hill as others have mentioned.

    Anyway, after reading these posts I crawled under to have a look at my hookes joint.

    Yikes!! looks like it was about ready to fail tommorow. Thanks forum members you may just have saved me plently $$$$.


  2. #2
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,519
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I don't think I have ever seen one (anywhere near) that bad that has not failed!

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Adelaide Hills - SA
    Posts
    12,486
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I didn't recognise Hookes Joint, so I looked up WikiPedia, and linked onto this fascinating device (well if you like engineering anyway):
    Thompson Couplings Ltd - What is the Thompson Coupling

    Download the explanatory video if you have broadband & 5 minutes to spare (and an engineering bent).

    How come our cars don't come with these devices as standard???

    Cheers
    David

  4. #4
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,519
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by spudboy View Post
    .......

    How come our cars don't come with these devices as standard???

    Cheers
    David
    1. they are quite a new invention - about five to ten years ago. (For comparison the Rzeppa joint was patented in 1927, but first appeared on a vehicle with the Mini in 1958, and did not displace the double Hooke joint in Citroen for example until 1976, and Landrover used the Tracta joint instead in 1948, as did Willys in 1940, and did not use the Rzeppa joint until 1970)

    2. They are bulky compared to other types of CV joint of the same strength

    3. I don't think they are being mass produced yet, and hence are a lot more expensive.

    But the main reason is that they are new and untried - and unknown. I would be surprised if many designers working for Landrover had even heard of them, let alone knew much about them. Thompson have said they are not trying (yet) to get into the automotive market.

    John
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!