We bought our 1995 ES 3.9 V8 auto

To replace our 1989 110 County V8 manual

For us this was the biggest mistake in our Landrover history! (i'm up to Landrover no 9 now). We were too well used to the room in the rear of the 110, we never used the Disco for an overnight trip, with the 4 of us in it there was bugger all room for any gear
. Fuel consumption in the disco on road was quite good, but off road was horrific compared to the 110's 3.5l manual. The Disco was the one Landrover I lost alot of money on, $4,000 in 9 months of ownership, compared to $1,500 in 7 years ownership of the 110. The differences were enough that when I hinted to the wife about selling the Disco and getting a Defender, the answer wasn't "should we" or "shouldn't we" or "can we afford it", it was "how fast can we get one!" She wanted back into a 110 too.
2 Weeks later we bought the 1995 300TDI

And now we are happy campers again
.
At the time of the changover (both private sales) the Defender was $17,000 and the Disco (same year 75,000 less KM) was $5,700. The Defender still has $17,000 agreed value insurance 2.5 years later.
We found the Disco to be a very good road car, but we had been "spoilt" by having the 110 before hand and couldn't handle the lack of load space.
1995 Defender 110 300TDI :D
1954 86" Series 1 Automatic :eek:
Ex '66 109" flat deck, '82 109" 3 door, '89 110 CSW V8, '74 Range Rover, '66 88" soft top, '78 88" soft top, '95 Disco ES V8, '88 Surf, '90 Surf, '84 V8 Surf, '91 Vitara.
Bookmarks