Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: Rotoflex or U-Joint conversion

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    brisbane
    Posts
    155
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Mine still looks fine after 370k. Been lifted 2"-2.5" all it's life. BTW this is a '95D1 I'm talking about here. I understand there are quality differences between the original and replacement/aftermarket ones though.

  2. #12
    p38arover's Avatar
    p38arover is offline Major part of the heart and soul of AULRO.com
    Administrator
    I'm here to help you!
    Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Western Sydney
    Posts
    30,707
    Total Downloaded
    1.63 MB
    Oddly enough, a few of us (Redback, DiscoWhite, & p38arover) were discussing this over lunch on Sunday.

    As Phil (Discowhite) pointed out, if the Rotoflex does fail, at least it will still provide drive and you can replace it on the roadside without special tools.
    Ron B.
    VK2OTC

    2003 L322 Range Rover Vogue 4.4 V8 Auto
    2007 Yamaha XJR1300
    Previous: 1983, 1986 RRC; 1995, 1996 P38A; 1995 Disco1; 1984 V8 County 110; Series IIA



    RIP Bucko - Riding on Forever

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    14,141
    Total Downloaded
    99.87 MB
    Disco2 geometry is way different to the other land rovers and the rotoflex isn't significantly affected by lift such as in the others.

    The advantage of changing the rotoflex out for the uni is that it is a much stronger setup and shock loading wont induce a failure.

    The disadvantage is that you lose the "cush" absorbtion of vibrations and shock loadings.

    In my opinion, if you are not breaking rotoflexs in a Disco2 and if the 3 bolt flange is compatible with your aftermarket pinions, then don't swap out the rotoflex. If you are breaking rotoflexs or running pinions with the big nut on the end, only then swap out the rotoflex for a uni.

    I swapped mine out for unis.
    Cheers
    Slunnie


    ~ Discovery II Td5 ~ Discovery 3dr V8 ~ Series IIa 6cyl ute ~ Series II V8 ute ~

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ellendale Tasmania.
    Posts
    12,986
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Slunnie View Post
    Disco2 geometry is way different to the other land rovers and the rotoflex isn't significantly affected by lift such as in the others.

    The advantage of changing the rotoflex out for the uni is that it is a much stronger setup and shock loading wont induce a failure.

    The disadvantage is that you lose the "cush" absorbtion of vibrations and shock loadings.

    In my opinion, if you are not breaking rotoflexs in a Disco2 and if the 3 bolt flange is compatible with your aftermarket pinions, then don't swap out the rotoflex. If you are breaking rotoflexs or running pinions with the big nut on the end, only then swap out the rotoflex for a uni.

    I swapped mine out for unis.
    I agree with Slunnie, the only reason I changed mine was because I had a locker fitted (it was recommended I do) otherwise I would not have changed, I had 130,000k on mine when I changed, still looked brand new.

    Baz.
    Cheers Baz.

    2011 Discovery 4 SE 2.7L
    1990 Perentie FFR EX Aust Army
    1967 Series IIa 109 (Farm Truck)
    2007 BMW R1200GS
    1979 BMW R80/7
    1983 BMW R100TIC Ex ACT Police
    1994 Yamaha XT225 Serow

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    West Pennant Hills
    Posts
    469
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by p38arover View Post
    Oddly enough, a few of us (Redback, DiscoWhite, & p38arover) were discussing this over lunch on Sunday.

    As Phil (Discowhite) pointed out, if the Rotoflex does fail, at least it will still provide drive and you can replace it on the roadside without special tools.
    Its clear from the replies that there's quite a range of experiences. In my case, I could not install the spare I was carrying as, when it failed, it sheared 2 of the high tensile bolts (I didn't carry spares of these) and mangled both the shaft flange and diff pinion flange.

    Mundy

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    677
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Redback View Post
    I agree with Slunnie, the only reason I changed mine was because I had a locker fitted (it was recommended I do) otherwise I would not have changed, I had 130,000k on mine when I changed, still looked brand new.

    Baz.
    Interesting, I Will be adding a rear locker at some point, so may do this conversion then if the advice goes that way

    Thanks for all the replies so far guys.........

  7. #17
    Andyb43 Guest
    We run an ARB Air locker in the rear and weigh 3.5 ton traveling mostly in you outback with no problems.

    Andy B

    www.landroveradventure.co.uk

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!