Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21

Thread: Nanocom- I think we have a problem

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    27
    Total Downloaded
    0

    Nanocom- I think we have a problem

    I have yet to find anyone who has mastered the injector code issue using nanocom.
    Testbook accepts the five digits stamped on the injector.
    Nanocom reads [e.g] NG GB 3GA. 7 digits.

    And nanocom will not respond to any questions on this.
    Tony

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    53
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Confusing!!!!!VERY confusing
    i've realised that before with the V2.04 i had diffrent reading compared to new V2.05?
    and i swear i havn't touched any settings......
    Before After
    INJECTOR1: LC LH 2-F-B INJECTOR1: LC LH 2-F-C
    INJECTOR2: NE NC 0-M-C INJECTOR2: NE NC 0-M-A
    INJECTOR3: LG NL 0-M-C INJECTOR3: LG NL 0-M-A
    INJECTOR4: NM ND 0-M-C INJECTOR4: NM ND 0-M-A
    INJECTOR5: LH NE 0-M-C INJECTOR5: LH NE 0-M-A

    The only thing that changes is the last Letter BUT still 7 digits
    Has anyone else had the same Problems?
    Cheers
    Vince

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    27
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bluerazor View Post
    Confusing!!!!!VERY confusing
    i've realised that before with the V2.04 i had diffrent reading compared to new V2.05?
    and i swear i havn't touched any settings......
    Before After
    INJECTOR1: LC LH 2-F-B INJECTOR1: LC LH 2-F-C
    INJECTOR2: NE NC 0-M-C INJECTOR2: NE NC 0-M-A
    INJECTOR3: LG NL 0-M-C INJECTOR3: LG NL 0-M-A
    INJECTOR4: NM ND 0-M-C INJECTOR4: NM ND 0-M-A
    INJECTOR5: LH NE 0-M-C INJECTOR5: LH NE 0-M-A

    The only thing that changes is the last Letter BUT still 7 digits
    Has anyone else had the same Problems?
    Cheers
    Vince
    I think these changes are one of the issues addressed in V2.05.
    It is only a small change. Your 5 digit code has not altered.
    Your No1 injector will be stamped LCLHF.
    So far as I can make out, if you were reinstalling this injector, you would enter LC in the first box- LH in the second box- and now it gets hazy.
    I think you only enter one digit in the third. Not sure if it is 'F' or if you substitute this for a '2'.
    I think that Nanocom then modifies that single entry to a 7 digit code.
    Tony

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    home at last - Port Macquarie NSW
    Posts
    1,271
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by discv View Post
    I think you only enter one digit in the third. Not sure if it is 'F' or if you substitute this for a '2'.
    I think that Nanocom then modifies that single entry to a 7 digit code.
    Tony
    thats the way it worked for me when i checked my codes

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Manly QLD
    Posts
    1,452
    Total Downloaded
    0
    http://web.nanocom.it/download/DIAGN...5%20ENGINE.pdf

    There are 3 types of injectors - it should allow you to enter what is stamped (single alpha/numeric character) then convert for the others
    L322 3.6TDv8 Lux

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    27
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bluerazor View Post
    Confusing!!!!!VERY confusing
    i've realised that before with the V2.04 i had diffrent reading compared to new V2.05?
    and i swear i havn't touched any settings......
    Before After
    INJECTOR1: LC LH 2-F-B INJECTOR1: LC LH 2-F-C
    INJECTOR2: NE NC 0-M-C INJECTOR2: NE NC 0-M-A
    INJECTOR3: LG NL 0-M-C INJECTOR3: LG NL 0-M-A
    INJECTOR4: NM ND 0-M-C INJECTOR4: NM ND 0-M-A
    INJECTOR5: LH NE 0-M-C INJECTOR5: LH NE 0-M-A

    The only thing that changes is the last Letter BUT still 7 digits
    Has anyone else had the same Problems?
    Cheers
    Vince
    If all my theories to date are correct, I think that your list is the wrong way round.
    I believe that the first column of codes is the correct/latest version.
    If I am right- I've got the answers. And it is soooo simple.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    53
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Nooop It's this way round before & After update
    This i can say for sure because i created a folder before and after
    The first row dated back 14/05/2009 with V2.04 and the second row 13/06/2009 with V2.05 firmware.
    I know it's confusing

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    27
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bluerazor View Post
    Nooop It's this way round before & After update
    This i can say for sure because i created a folder before and after
    The first row dated back 14/05/2009 with V2.04 and the second row 13/06/2009 with V2.05 firmware.
    I know it's confusing
    Thanks for confirming what I thought. There is a problem with V2.05.
    And Nanocom will not reply about this.
    Your first column of readings makes sense- the 2nd is wrong.
    Have you, by chance, got a record of the 5 digit code stamped on your injectors. [Not what Nanocom says]
    Tony

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    27
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Bluerazor, Changed my mind! I'll tell YOU your five no. alpha/numeric codes.

    Injector 1 LCLHF
    2 NENCM
    3 LGNLM
    4 NMNDM
    5 LHNEM
    Why have I done come up with this?
    Well unless there are 2 Bluerazors -your Italian might get me a response from Nanocom- and I need your help!
    Tony

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    53
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Ok I will contact Mattia "Nanocom for explanations"
    I'll keep you informed.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!