Has anyone watched the mythbusters experiment and subsequent explanation of why it will take off??
Cheers Rod
Sent from my GT-I9507 using AULRO mobile app
I see that you are still confining yourself to assertions with no explanation .
1973 Series III LWB 1983 - 2006
1998 300 Tdi Defender Trayback 2006 - often fitted with a Trayon slide-on camper.
Has anyone watched the mythbusters experiment and subsequent explanation of why it will take off??
Cheers Rod
Sent from my GT-I9507 using AULRO mobile app
Yes. I watched it.
I also read some of the responses on a couple of forums from people who think that Mythbusters got it wrong. They are all making the same mistake as the airframe fitters and pilots on this forum.
They all fail to realise that the treadmill can't stop the plane moving forward.
1973 Series III LWB 1983 - 2006
1998 300 Tdi Defender Trayback 2006 - often fitted with a Trayon slide-on camper.
Im gunna go get some popcorn, this threads as much fun to watch as some of the ones about getting a 2:1 off of a single snatch block.
The planes going to fly, anyone on here who is a licensed pilot, or knows a licensed pilot that says otherwise in order of my preference
1. hand in your ticket.
2. at least let me know when and where you'll be in the air so I can go be somewhere safer
3. identify yourself to me before I get into a plane you'll be flying so I can get right back out again.
Dave
"In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."
For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.
Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
TdiautoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)
If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.
I can't imagine a plane which doesn't have enough thrust to counter the rolling resistance of it's wheels, so I'm in the she will fly camp.
Cheers, Billy.
Keeping it simple is complicated.
Unless it is a really small treadmill..
Then the plane will crash into the controls and stop...
Or it will go slow and fall of the back - activating the emergency stop lanyard...
At which time the crash site may be covered in Flies...
No he's NOT. And the quote has the answer...
Think of it like this:
Skateboard on a treadmill..
Support skateboard (hold in place)
Turn on treadmill...
Skateboard stays in place but the wheels rotate being driven by the treadmill. Let's say at 10km/h
Can the skateboard move forwards? Of course it can - just push it forwards using your hand that was holding it in place. Just like a Jet/Prop can push/pull the aeroplane forwards (increasing its SPEED through the AIR).
The side effect, the wheels underneath the skateboard are now rotating at the speed of the treadmill + the speed of the board moving forwards..
So the aeroplane can gain speed regardless - which, assuming a long enough conveyor - will allow the aeroplane to gain sufficient AIRSPEED across the wings to induce lift and eventually flight.
So IF the Aeroplane requires 100knots to lift off, and the head wind is 25knots, and IF the aeroplane accelerates to 75 knots SOG it will take flight.... (because AIRSPEED is now 100 knots)
And all this time - assuming the conveyor operator is running his belt at 75 knots the opposite direction (matching the aeroplanes speed on ground) the wheels on the aeroplane will be rotating the opposite direction to the aeroplanes direction of travel at a rotational equivalent of 150knots when it lifts off....
Not rocket science......
Good analogy Tombie, I was thinking skate board with a sail on it like a windsurfer.
At uni they always try to teach critical thinking and it takes a while for them to pick it up. This thread should be part of the critical thinking syllabus = don't believe what people state as fact even if they are experts in the field.
Firstly, this is a serious question. Would someone who is trained and operates a piece of equipment (bobcat, scissor lift, aeroplane, whatever) be considered an expert on it?. I appreciate that a pilot may have a greater theoretical understanding of how his chosen piece of hardware works as opposed to a grader operator ( for example), but does that make them a qualified expert?
Flame suit on just incase
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! | Search All the Web! | 
|---|
|  |  | 
Bookmarks