Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 47

Thread: Lost propeller

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Canberra/Melbourne
    Posts
    1,711
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by kogvos View Post
    That's just a backronym. The original comes from the French word panne. Similar to mayday (venez m'aider) and most of the others such as securite, seelonce, etc.).
    It's a level down from a Mayday. If I was onboard I think a Mayday might have been more appropriate and a "Land as soon as Possible" just in case the same bloke fitted both props. I do fly in in helicopters so I guess losing a "prop" for us is very serious.
    [SIGPIC]

    2012 LR Defender 90 (BERT) Gone
    2012 Husqvarna WR 300
    2014 FPV F6 Gone
    2005 D3 SE V8
    2011 D4 V8
    2016 Moto Guzzi California Audace.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Avoca Beach
    Posts
    14,150
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I note in the paper this morning the pilot reported an "uncalled for engine reaction" or something similar prior to losing the prop.

    This led me to remember the doco on Beaufighters recently where the pilots would put the engine on full power if they saw oil pressure dropping and when it seized the prop would fly off and not create drag.

    Leads me to wonder if the motor seized .

    Regards Philip A

  3. #23
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    On The Road
    Posts
    30,031
    Total Downloaded
    0
    just a noob question,,
    would losing a prop cause the engine to over rev?
    "How long since you've visited The Good Oil?"

    '93 V8 Rossi
    '97 to '07. sold.
    '01 V8 D2
    '06 to 10. written off.
    '03 4.6 V8 HSE D2a with Tornado ECM
    '10 to '21
    '16.5 RRS SDV8
    '21 to Infinity and Beyond!


    1988 Isuzu Bus. V10 15L NA Diesel
    Home is where you park it..

    [IMG][/IMG]

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Irymple, Victoria, Australia
    Posts
    2,902
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I am only guessing, but perhaps the engine seized, then the prop sheared off!
    My uncle who is 93 and still living, flew on Beaufighters (30 Squadron RAAF) during world war two and says if during combat they sustained damage to an engine, they would then try to flee the combat zone and head for the open sea, with the damaged engine running at full revs, so that once it seized the prop would shear off. They would then put the plain down in the open sea and be rescued by one of the Catalina's, that were normally skirting the battle zones for these situations. This happened to my uncle three times in his WW2 service.
    I assume they didn't perform very well on one engine, they were known to be very "twitchy" on take off with two engines, due to the fact that the engines were very powerful, so maybe landing on a strip with only one corkscrew going was extremely difficult.


    Cheers, Mick.
    1974 S3 88 Holden 186.
    1971 S2A 88
    1971 S2A 109 6 cyl. tray back.
    1964 S2A 88 "Starfire Four" engine!
    1972 S3 88 x 2
    1959 S2 88 ARN 111-014
    1959 S2 88 ARN 111-556
    1988 Perentie 110 FFR ARN 48-728 steering now KLR PAS!
    REMLR 88
    1969 BSA Bantam B175

  5. #25
    Join Date
    May 2016
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    507
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If the engine didn't seize, there should be separate overspeed protections built in for the propeller and engine itself.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The engine is a gas turbine so at the revs they spin they do not seize - they disintegrate with turbine blades going every where and fire and flame outs - that did not happen so more like a failure in the output end of the gearbox - as mentioned fatigue in the shaft is a likely option.

    The other option is that it did loose one one blade and the immediate imbalance ripped the who lot out. I guess we have to wait and see.

    Garry

  7. #27
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    brighton, brisbane
    Posts
    33,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by kogvos View Post
    That's just a backronym. The original comes from the French word panne. Similar to mayday (venez m'aider) and most of the others such as securite, seelonce, etc.).
    As the RN would say, back in the day, all disasters came from the French.
    I’m pretty sure the dinosaurs died out when they stopped gathering food and started having meetings to discuss gathering food

    A bookshop is one of the only pieces of evidence we have that people are still thinking

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Kingston, Tassie, OZ.
    Posts
    13,728
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Looks like the actual whole shaft has sheared inside the reduction box/ planetary assembly... very very lucky it didn't slice through the fuselage. They are a big bladed prop...😮
    The Isuzu 110. Solid and as dependable as a rock, coming soon with auto box😊
    The Range Rover L322 4.4.TTDV8 ....probably won't bother with the remap..😈

  9. #29
    JDNSW's Avatar
    JDNSW is online now RoverLord Silver Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Central West NSW
    Posts
    29,511
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Sheared or just detached? - I don't know what holds the shaft in, but seeing it is normally 'pulling' it will have some sort of thrust bearing, possibly a tapered roller bearing, and if this fails, could it leave the thrust (pull) unsupported, or just supported by an alloy case - which would very rapidly wear away. This scenario could result from loss of oil in the reduction box.
    John

    JDNSW
    1986 110 County 3.9 diesel
    1970 2a 109 2.25 petrol

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Well according to the news, vibration started 25min out of Albury and at 18,000' - so the aircraft would have been near Tumut - the engine was shut down and descended to 8000'. If the engine is like most other turbo props with the prop feathered it should not be able to rotate but they did not say if could the fully feathered and locked.

    The prop fell off over Camden some time after the engine was shut down. Questions are being asked why the aircraft did not divert to Canberra when the problem first arose - most likely would have arrived before the prop fell off.

    It looks like the crack started sometime back and questions are being asked why this had not been picked up in routine maintenance.

    I guess we now need to wait for the report. It is not clear at this stage whether the prop was turning or not when it fell off.

    Garry

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!