Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17

Thread: A UPS plane has crashed on take off in Louisville KY.

  1. #11
    BradC is online now Super Moderator
    No one of consequence
    Supporter
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Perth (near Malaga)
    Posts
    3,559
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by V8Ian View Post
    Not even planned.
    Clearly. Back in 2003 we helped design a new Airport Control Center for Dubai Airport. The concept was it had to survive an "unplanned landing" from a 747. It was mostly underground. When most of these airports were built they just were not designed for the structural load required to cope with todays jet propelled whales.
    MY08 D3 - The Antichrist - "Permagrimace". Turn the key and play the "will it get me home again" lottery.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    5,503
    Total Downloaded
    0

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    5,503
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I think we can say that number 1 engine failed. They've found blades all down the runway. It then fell off and chose not to go flying.

    I suspect they were just passengers heading to the scene of the crash after that.

    I suspect the bulk of the investigation will be about how an engine failed so catastrophically that it sprayed bits everywhere which likely caused critical damage, and then fell off. The maintenance and past history of this AC is going to be the focus.

    Engine failures happen on takeoff and they are supposed to stay contained and pilots are trained to go flying and sort it out later.

    https://www.youtube.com/live/srB2ezb...Xgu2LnzdJq2KpG
     2005 Defender 110 

  4. #14
    BradC is online now Super Moderator
    No one of consequence
    Supporter
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Perth (near Malaga)
    Posts
    3,559
    Total Downloaded
    0
    From the various videos available it looks like when #1 failed it caused an issue with #2. Once #2 went there was no way back.

    Not good.
    MY08 D3 - The Antichrist - "Permagrimace". Turn the key and play the "will it get me home again" lottery.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Back down the hill.
    Posts
    29,789
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Yes, it seems that #2 ingested parts of #1.
    In the case of engine failure, the housing is supposed to contain all parts. That didn't happen in this case.
    If you don't like trucks, stop buying stuff.
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/signaturepics/sigpic20865_1.gif

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Brisbane
    Posts
    5,503
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I saw they think #2 was surging too. Looks like they were just passengers on the way to the scene of the accident.
     2005 Defender 110 

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The Hills.
    Posts
    19,204
    Total Downloaded
    152.79 MB
    As Juan points out, there have been pylon failures in the past. The engine thrust has to go somewhere. The engine can rotate up over the wing. The FOD the #2 engine ingested could easily have come from the remains of the pylon. In any case, if the #2 lost thrust all bets were off
    They might reconsider siting a fuel recycling plant at the end of the runway.
    ​JayTee

    Nullus Anxietus

    Cancer is gender blind.

    2000 D2 TD5 Auto: Tins
    1994 D1 300TDi Manual: Dave
    1980 SIII Petrol Tray: Doris
    OKApotamus #74
    Nanocom, D2 TD5 only.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!