Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 41

Thread: Australian Army - Exercise Chong Ju

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    RIVERLAND, SOUTH AUSTRALIA
    Posts
    6,740
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    I thought the point of camouflage was to hide the item from the background.

    With all the M113 in nearly identical patterns they are highly visible by the repetition. They may as well have been painted bright red!
    yeah, but I cant find all 26 of them in the picture!!
    (REMLR 235/MVCA 9) 80" -'49.(RUST), -'50 & '52. (53-parts) 88" -57 s1, -'63 -s2a -GS x 2-"Horrie"-112-769, "Vet"-112-429(-Vietnam-PRE 1ATF '65) ('66, s2a-as UN CIVPOL), Hans '73- s3 109" '56 s1 x2 77- s3 van (gone)& '12- 110

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Melbourn(ish)
    Posts
    26,497
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BBC View Post
    And now ..........the ADF do not possess the combat capability to manouvere their Main Battle Tank across water obstacles.

    Our brightest and best forgot to address that need!
    I dunno, they managed to get them here over what I wouldn't consider to be an insignificant body of water...
    Dave

    "In a Landrover the other vehicle is your crumple zone."

    For spelling call Rogets, for mechanicing call me.

    Fozzy, 2.25D SIII Ex DCA Ute
    Tdi autoManual d1 (gave it to the Mupion)
    Archaeoptersix 1990 6x6 dual cab(This things staying)


    If you've benefited from one or more of my posts please remember, your taxes paid for my skill sets, I'm just trying to make sure you get your monies worth.
    If you think you're in front on the deal, pay it forwards.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Australia, East Timor, the 'Stan', Ghana, Uganda, Somalia, Kenya, Tanzania, Mozambique, Sierra Leone
    Posts
    1,164
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Blknight.aus View Post
    I dunno, they managed to get them here over what I wouldn't consider to be an insignificant body of water...
    Yes, we can get them across the Pacific but, we can't get them across something like the Murray. Their tactical mobility has not been catered for.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    wetherill park
    Posts
    2,600
    Total Downloaded
    0
    might have to keep the leopard bridgelayers a bit longer

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Australia, East Timor, the 'Stan', Ghana, Uganda, Somalia, Kenya, Tanzania, Mozambique, Sierra Leone
    Posts
    1,164
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by THE BOOGER View Post
    might have to keep the leopard bridgelayers a bit longer
    They don't fit over them...plus... a significant difference in weight.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by digger View Post
    yeah, but I cant find all 26 of them in the picture!!
    You expect me to believe that the Australian Army had all 26 running at the same time?

    Do you think I was born yesterday?

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,662
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by BBC View Post
    And now ..........the ADF do not possess the combat capability to manouvere their Main Battle Tank across water obstacles.

    Our brightest and best forgot to address that need!
    Just out of interest how many times did the leopards need to cross a river when in service?

    Do you think that the brass and politicians have bought the refurbed Abrams with the intention that they will only ever deploy to a war zone with the US and will use the US to supply the river crossing ability?

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Bracken Ridge - Brisbane - QLD
    Posts
    14,276
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by BBC View Post
    They don't fit over them...plus... a significant difference in weight.
    a mate of mine was up in darwin last year test the new bridging, pretty sure it was the new tanks..........oh and of course there were issues, from memory a tank got stuck on the bridge as well, typical day in the defence force

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Bracken Ridge - Brisbane - QLD
    Posts
    14,276
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    Just out of interest how many times did the leopards need to cross a river when in service?

    Do you think that the brass and politicians have bought the refurbed Abrams with the intention that they will only ever deploy to a war zone with the US and will use the US to supply the river crossing ability?
    gotta agree, the defence is being a little smarter these days and aligning our equipment with other countrys so that we don't have to deploy our equipment and that our guys can hop straight into say an american tank

    i glance over the latest ARMY rag and some gunner received medals for serving with the brits and pretty sure they used there guns and were trained on them during pre-deployment training, once you know the basics your halfway there

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Loganlea Qld
    Posts
    1,652
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Back around 1967/8 we were tempted by the Sheridan Tank, another Yank invention, and it had amphibious qualities. Only took around half a day to set it up with its rubber waterproof skirt, but hey, it worked!

    This shot was taken at Mourilyan Harbour in FNQ (not too far from Innisfail). An interesting day to say the least, but it floated. The skirt fitted snugly to the hull fully encasing the upper deck. In this first shot the top of the turret with the crewey sitting gingerly in his place, guiding a totally blind driver into the water and the barrel of the gun can just be seen protruding from the skirt at the front. (Excuse the focus but it was the best I could do on the day.)


    These later shots were taken in Jarrah Creek, in the Innisfail district FNQ.



    So it was amphibious, but ever so slightly vulnerable.

    At the same time trials were being carried out on the Carriers in similar conditions.


    We didn't buy the Sheridan!
    Regards
    Glen

    1962 P5 3 Ltr Coupe (Gwennie)
    1963 2a gunbuggy 112-722 (Onslow) ex 6 RAR
    1964 2a 88" SWB 113 251 (Daisy) ex JTC

    REMLR 226

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!