Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 36

Thread: Who is familiar with Pythagoras?

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    259
    Total Downloaded
    0
    isuzutoo-eh wrote,..
    Talking about learning the skills and knowing how to use them...
    When learning differentiation/integration at school, my teachers in year 11 and 12 didn't know or couldn't tell us what it was for. Then I learnt it at uni, again the lecturers couldn't tell us what it was for. It wasn't until studying 2nd year modern (or was it classical?) physics that any of it was used. And they taught it to us again there, so those previous two goes at learning it were redundant.

    They teach waaay too much crap at school.
    I would strongly disagree with that statement. Leaving the learning of Calculus until a student is capable of attending University would be far too late. One of the main problems with school students and they way in which they learn is far too much reliance is placed on their calculators. Take the calculator away and the majority will flounder, unable to think logically or to apply first principles in solving even the most simple of problems.

    Ron.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Near Seven Hills, Sydney
    Posts
    4,342
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Problem solving comes in all areas of life, be it metalwork or cooking or maths or even working out how to wrap your tongue around foreign words. It shouldn't be left up to something as abstract as maths to teach problem solving. No wonder everything in the world has a perceived numeric value aka price, its because we have numbers thrust down our throats. Well thats how I see it
    But i am biased, I was in the top maths class in year 9 and 10 but the teacher was hopeless, come year 11 and 12 I struggled through 3 unit for a few months before dropping back to 2 unit.
    The only good maths teacher at my school was the hockey team coach! Never conceded a single goal (thats the maths i can understand )

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Supine
    Posts
    1,077
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I've been taking Pythagorath Theorem - it'th like a thyrup - now for thome yearth to rid me of thith lithp...not helping though...

  4. #14
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Heathcote (in "The Shire")
    Posts
    5,348
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by RoverP6B View Post
    isuzutoo-eh wrote,..

    I would strongly disagree with that statement. Leaving the learning of Calculus until a student is capable of attending University would be far too late. One of the main problems with school students and they way in which they learn is far too much reliance is placed on their calculators. Take the calculator away and the majority will flounder, unable to think logically or to apply first principles in solving even the most simple of problems.

    Ron.
    Agree, to a point - the biggest problem is that at school they teach things, but give the students no idea of an application for what they have learnt.

    As for calculators etc - there is a reason we are not still using, slide rules and chambers 7 figure log tables.

    We do however tend to become too reliant on them. In my younger days (as a surveyor) calculators were so much the norm that i would find myself reaching for one to add 2+2 (by the way =5 for very large values of 2 ) It took a very conscious effort to break out of that mindset.



    Martyn

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    259
    Total Downloaded
    0
    So how are we travelling with the question? It's a good brain teaser I must say.

    Ron.

  6. #16
    slug_burner is offline TopicToaster Gold Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,024
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I gave it a go but it was doing my head in. Might look at it later.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Near Seven Hills, Sydney
    Posts
    4,342
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I guess my first reply was wrong then...?

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    NSW , Pennant Hills
    Posts
    3,477
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Area=a=1/2*b*h
    so h=2a/b






    if you project h at right angle to the base , it gives you 2 sides l+q

    so b=l+b so using hypothenuse theorem

    and call each side m and n

    Perimetre = m + n + b

    m^2 = Q^2 + h^2
    n^2= l^2 +h^2

    h = Square root ( m^2 - q^2)
    and h = Square root (n^2-l^2)

    so h = 2a/b = Square root ( m^2 - q^2) = h = Square root (n^2-l^2)


    all the best in understanding all that

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    259
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Disco_owner wrote,..
    Area=a=1/2*b*h
    so h=2a/b






    if you project h at right angle to the base , it gives you 2 sides l+q

    so b=l+b so using hypothenuse theorem

    and call each side m and n

    Perimetre = m + n + b

    m^2 = Q^2 + h^2
    n^2= l^2 +h^2

    h = Square root ( m^2 - q^2)
    and h = Square root (n^2-l^2)

    so h = 2a/b = Square root ( m^2 - q^2) = h = Square root (n^2-l^2)
    Hello Disco_owner,

    You have introduced a number of unknows, where as the question requires that you define the length of the hypotenuse only in terms of Perimeter 'P' and Area 'A', which as the question says you already know. In other words,..given the area and perimeter as 2 numerical values,...what is the length of the hypotenuse? The expression will only contain 'P' and 'A' how ever many times is necessary to give the exact length of the hypotenuse.

    Ron.

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Alice Springs NT
    Posts
    286
    Total Downloaded
    0
    My Turn My Turn !!!!

    So if

    a<squared> + b<squared> = c<squared>
    and
    A(area) = ab/2
    then 2A = ab
    and 4A =2ab


    (Remember these things)

    P(perimeter) = a + b + c
    P - c = a + b
    (P - c)<squared> = (a + b)<squared>
    (p - c)<squared> = a<squared> = b<squared> +2ab


    then bringing in those things we remembered above:

    (P - c)<squared> = c<squared> + 4A
    P<squared> - c<squared> -2Pc = c<squared> + 4A

    cancel out the c<squared>s

    P<squared> -2Pc = 4A
    -2Pc = 4A - P<squared>
    2Pc = P<squared> - 4A


    c = P/2 - 2A/P


    I think thats right but am open to critism

    Cheers

    Jason

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!