Reply With QuoteYes please ! Sounds likea weapon !
I would !Nobody is going to take a $165,000 luxury SUV bush-bashing through the Simpson Desert.
(The Lantana laden bush would be more of a concern to me).
Master
An interesting read for a number of reasons.......
Range Rover Diesel V8 | New Range Rover Vogue TDV8
DS
Major Part of the Heart and Soul of AULRO
SubscriberYes please ! Sounds likea weapon !
I would !Nobody is going to take a $165,000 luxury SUV bush-bashing through the Simpson Desert.
(The Lantana laden bush would be more of a concern to me).
It's not broken. It's "Carbon Neutral".
gone
1993 Defender 110 ute "Doris"
1994 Range Rover Vogue LSE "The Luxo-Barge"
1994 Defender 130 HCPU "Rolly"
1996 Discovery 1
current
1995 Defender 130 HCPU and Suzuki GSX1400
Master
x 2 to that!!!Originally Posted by VladTepes
ChatterBox
I like the Range Rover Vogue Autobiography, a 5.0 litre supercharged V8 that is quicker off the mark than a Falcon FPV
The price tag for that one though is $212,000.00I wonder how quick JE Engineerings "Zulu" Defender is ?? That has the 5.0 litre supercharged Jaguar engine in it but is half the price, now that I could take off road
The current model is pretty frugal. My mate's is on 11.3 l /100km.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Swaggie
Subscriber8 speed auto
Wizard
had a price sheet made for a top of the range rover auto-by, 5L
i dident no the hydraulic side steps were a 10k option!!!
and metallic paint.
but yes,, the most expensive rover to buy of the floor is 297,550
DRIVE AWAY
YarnMaster
When you nail that throttle into the carpet, it just goes...I like the Range Rover Vogue Autobiography, a 5.0 litre supercharged V8 that is quicker off the mark than a Falcon FPV
M
YarnMaster
I do...
I was out in the new RR a couple of months ago and the new engine/g-box is superb. I didn't think it could be possible but it is noticeably better than the outgoing model.
...and it sits quite happily at 200KPH...
M
OldBushie
I would and have had my $169k RR off road when and WHERE I can. The 20” rims make it pretty useless for any serious off roading.
I have also got as low as 9.1L on a number of runs out in the south west, on flat roads, travelling at no more than 115 KPH and I average no more than 11.5 around town at any times.
On one trip WAY out west on a long section of flat open road, over a 120km section of road, I averaged 149.7 KPH and the on board fuel reading was just over 12L, but I don’t know how accurate that is.
But I have to be honest, unless there are some radically improved features, I can’t see why any body would now buy a new RR over a D4.
Posting Permissions
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks