Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: My saggy old lady

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Rockhampton, Qld
    Posts
    130
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    The old tyre sizes 7.50x16, 8.25x16 and 9.00x16 are getting hard to find in decent tread patterns. You would be better off going to a similar p-metric size like 255/85-16 (33" diameter).

    Rocky Mountain Parabolics are available from FWD Motors in Brisbane. However I have posted some threads on how you can modify your own springs if you have the time, inclination, and a friendly local spring works.

    SOA is not legal in QLD.
    I don't want to go to metric sizing because i cant find them tall enough without compromising on going wider. (skinnier is better IMO)

    Ill have a look at your posts regarding modifying my springs and at FWD Motors.

    Do you mean SOA is ilegal for landies? hiluxes have them stock..

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    13,786
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Chomby View Post
    I don't want to go to metric sizing because i cant find them tall enough without compromising on going wider. (skinnier is better IMO)

    Ill have a look at your posts regarding modifying my springs and at FWD Motors.

    Do you mean SOA is ilegal for landies? hiluxes have them stock..
    255/85 are metric and fairly narrow - about the same size as an 8.25x16.
    Silverstone make a 280/85-16 and I think michelin make a XXX/100-16. Both of which are about the same size as a 9.00.

    SOA is legal if it came from the factory - the current modification rules specifically state that SOA conversions are illegal. They may become legal if and when QLD finally ratifies the NCOP.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    18,616
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If a vehicle has SOA like HiLuxes and my Land Rover 101 as built then yes they are legal but if a vehicle was not built like that, then engineering approval is required - and some jurisdictions may have decided that this type of modification must not be done.

    In a series landrover I would expect the lift would be too great as the front driveshaft will hit the bell housing cross member (the 101 does not have one).

    So without major modifications the the chassis I suspect it is not actually possible to do a soa/high lift on a series. I think the lift that an army chassis has would about the max you could lift.

    Garry
    REMLR 243

    2007 Range Rover Sport TDV6
    1977 FC 101
    1976 Jaguar XJ12C
    1973 Haflinger AP700
    1971 Jaguar V12 E-Type Series 3 Roadster
    1957 Series 1 88"
    1957 Series 1 88" Station Wagon

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Rockhampton, Qld
    Posts
    130
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by isuzurover View Post
    255/85 are metric and fairly narrow - about the same size as an 8.25x16.
    Silverstone make a 280/85-16 and I think michelin make a XXX/100-16. Both of which are about the same size as a 9.00.

    SOA is legal if it came from the factory - the current modification rules specifically state that SOA conversions are illegal. They may become legal if and when QLD finally ratifies the NCOP.
    Thanks very much for clearing that up. I've been looking at michelin and silverstone the last week with no luck but ill have another gander. Its a shame about the SOA, found some converted that looked rather nice
    [nomedia="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRIV121jrow&playnext=1&videos=LII293_5pu0"]YouTube- Rock Chucker (Metal Masher) at Land Rover National Rally[/nomedia]

    Thanks again for your help

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Rockhampton, Qld
    Posts
    130
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by garrycol View Post
    If a vehicle has SOA like HiLuxes and my Land Rover 101 as built then yes they are legal but if a vehicle was not built like that, then engineering approval is required - and some jurisdictions may have decided that this type of modification must not be done.

    In a series landrover I would expect the lift would be too great as the front driveshaft will hit the bell housing cross member (the 101 does not have one).

    So without major modifications the the chassis I suspect it is not actually possible to do a soa/high lift on a series. I think the lift that an army chassis has would about the max you could lift.

    Garry
    I was aware of the crossmembers being an issue. my rear tailshaft has been grinding on the rear crossmember because i think the engine mounts on the 202 i installed were too far back hence pulling the tailshaft forward (not happy)

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!