View Poll Results: Pick one and explain why

Voters
107. You may not vote on this poll
  • Series 3 Stage One

    7 6.54%
  • County (Isuzu)

    55 51.40%
  • Defender (Tdi)

    45 42.06%
Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 64

Thread: Objectively - which is best? Stage 1 vs County vs Defender

  1. #41
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by justinc View Post
    I'm pretty sure wagoo will have plenty to say, should make for interesting reading....

    JC
    Lets hear it. Pat

  2. #42
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PAT303 View Post
    Can you beat my Tdi Wagoo?,pretender hey,where have you been and what have you done?. Pat
    hahaha wrong person to call out Pat. While I do enjoy your contribution and experinces here, I believe Wagoo to be a bit more realistic shall we say with the LR marque....

    And you know that I have/had a tdi...but would still vote for the Isuzu 110 county if all are in stock form. All have their pros and cons but the 110 County would seem the one with the least amount of issues to sort like disc brakes.

    But if I could have anything in new stock form it would be a 77 2 door Range Rover...

  3. #43
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Goolwa SA - but top ender forever
    Posts
    2,515
    Total Downloaded
    0
    oo oo oo
    I want to get one of the army landies when they sell them off - SWMBO even agrees

    do these count? I dont actually know which model they are but I will get one

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Good call Blitz, they are 3.9 Isuzu'd engined lt95 4 speed, sals rear, rover front. AEU2522 cv's, gal chassis.

    Im not sure about difflocks, but I think the vehicles that do have them, they are borg warner. The Thomas pto which is/was an upgraded version of what they sold to civi's.

    cheers,
    Serg

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Ipswich Qld
    Posts
    1,309
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I owned a S3 stg 1 3.9D and all I could fault was the transfer box.It needed the upgrades that the latter boxes had.I put OME suspension on mine and it made a much better vehicle off road.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  6. #46
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by uninformed View Post
    hahaha wrong person to call out Pat. While I do enjoy your contribution and experinces here, I believe Wagoo to be a bit more realistic shall we say with the LR marque....

    And you know that I have/had a tdi...but would still vote for the Isuzu 110 county if all are in stock form. All have their pros and cons but the 110 County would seem the one with the least amount of issues to sort like disc brakes.

    But if I could have anything in new stock form it would be a 77 2 door Range Rover...
    I know where your coming from serg but to say Tdi's or Td5's can't do what an Isuzu can do is taking it a bit too far.The county is a good machine but the world moves on,going by the rubbish around today it might not go where we want it to but thats the way it is. Pat

  7. #47
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Forgot to add that if I ever get a decent shed I'm going to retore a late 70's RRC,The best stock 4WD ever made. Pat

  8. #48
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    oh I agree. My only beef with LR is the removal of things/material in places that have made it worse...they should have left well enough alone. With regards to the engine, the new tech is great....I just wish at a greater displacement.

  9. #49
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Sydney's gritty inner west (2204) and verdant Mount Wilson
    Posts
    7,447
    Total Downloaded
    0
    If you do the $ conversion a 1985 Isuzu County would cost at least $80,000 in today's terms and for all the very good reasons outlined in this thread.

    Today you couldn't justify that price for such a "primitive" vehicle...Toyota are struggling with their version at that price.

    The "pretenders" now can only be built to a lower price point.
    Mahn England

    DEFENDER 110 D300 SE '23 (the S M E G)

    Ex DEFENDER 110 wagon '08 (the Kelvinator)
    http://www.aulro.com/afvb/members-rides/105691-one_iotas-110-inch-kelvinator.html

    Ex 300Tdi Disco:



  10. #50
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    5,101
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by one_iota View Post
    If you do the $ conversion a 1985 Isuzu County would cost at least $80,000 in today's terms and for all the very good reasons outlined in this thread.

    Today you couldn't justify that price for such a "primitive" vehicle...Toyota are struggling with their version at that price.

    The "pretenders" now can only be built to a lower price point.
    in 1985, how much was a toyota landcruiser,Nissan patrol?...I dont think Toyota are struggling that much, I see lots of the new ones on the road here, and thats with the not so good reputation of the V8D

Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!