Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 49

Thread: New 4wd - not LR. What to get?

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    ArmidaleNSW
    Posts
    160
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The new Patrol should be out by May next year, i think they will have a new diesel engine, rumours are of a V6 TD from Peugeot to go alongside the 400BHP V8 Petrol.

    The Partol would be my choice of what you are looking at, no questions in my mind at all, i owned a GQ 4.2D, old school, but bulletproof and arguably the best 4x4 ever.

    Pajero's are pretty good, but you'd regret having one offroad, Dual cab id forget about unless you need the convenience of the tray, i have a Bravo (inherited) and while it does everything well, its not very comfortable to travel in, if you want a dual cab the D-max is the best.

  2. #22
    jddisco200tdi Guest
    As its a govt vehicle can you do modifications.
    The Pajero's intercooler is very vulnerable to damage as it hangs low at the front. It needs the flimsy protection plates replaced with real ones.
    Also inside luggage space is not much different to a D1.

    Are you sure you won't consider a base model Prado ?

    Regards

    John D - Defender 110 2.4

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Nowra, NSW
    Posts
    313
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Having recently spent bit of time in a NSW NPWS Pajero offroad, I have to admit I was impressed. It's not a Land Rover, but I'd seriously consider it. Was an auto diesel too! Friends have a Prado through work, but they like our Land Rover D2 better. Shame Land Rover has headed in the wrong direction in recent years - away from their roots; when it comes time to replace the D2 it may not be with another Land Rover. At least I'll still have the S2a.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    450
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by jddisco200tdi View Post
    As its a govt vehicle can you do modifications.
    The Pajero's intercooler is very vulnerable to damage as it hangs low at the front. It needs the flimsy protection plates replaced with real ones.
    Also inside luggage space is not much different to a D1.

    Are you sure you won't consider a base model Prado ?

    Regards

    John D - Defender 110 2.4
    Will be able to do some mods. I'll also spec up at time of purchase with bullbar/winch, suspension, roofrack and MT tyres.

    Prado really isn't a consideration. They are close to $10k more than the equivalent Pajero, are underpowered and have terrible driving dynamics.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Ipswich Qld
    Posts
    1,309
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by jddisco200tdi View Post
    As its a govt vehicle can you do modifications.
    The Pajero's intercooler is very vulnerable to damage as it hangs low at the front. It needs the flimsy protection plates replaced with real ones.
    Also inside luggage space is not much different to a D1.

    Are you sure you won't consider a base model Prado ?

    Regards

    John D - Defender 110 2.4
    Judging by what I have read and with experience of having a new Prado in my immediate family,I wouldn't touch one with a barge pole.Also as mentioned in a previous post,you would be disappointed in the off road capability of the Pajero,IMHO.So you are between a rock and a hard place are you not?

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    450
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Disco44 View Post
    JAlso as mentioned in a previous post,you would be disappointed in the off road capability of the Pajero,IMHO.So you are between a rock and a hard place are you not?
    I'm curious why people seem to think that the Pajero will be worse than say a D1 off road? Pajero has pretty good traction control and for $600 can option up with a factory rear difflock, whereas D1 is all open. Wheel travel is worse in a Pajero but i think better traction makes up for this. Only real difference would be ground clearance and i think in real life situations it would be pretty marginal.

    There are also so few difficult tracks around these days (particularly in the high country) that there is little point in going overboard with off road ability at the expense of day-to-day comfort. If i want to do anything hard, i still have the RR.

  7. #27
    VladTepes's Avatar
    VladTepes is offline Major Part of the Heart and Soul of AULRO Subscriber
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bracken Ridge, Qld
    Posts
    16,055
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by TuffRR View Post
    I'd expect that the Pajero will actually be more capable off-road than the D1 that it is replacing. D1 with open diffs vs Pajero with traction control and rear difflock. On road will be better too.
    Well you can expect that but compare the ground clearance between the two and you may come to a different conclusion.

    Besides I didn;t think Paj's had a factory rear diff lock (unless its an option in which case you are comparing apples with oranges)
    It's not broken. It's "Carbon Neutral".


    gone


    1993 Defender 110 ute "Doris"
    1994 Range Rover Vogue LSE "The Luxo-Barge"
    1994 Defender 130 HCPU "Rolly"
    1996 Discovery 1

    current

    1995 Defender 130 HCPU and Suzuki GSX1400


  8. #28
    Tombie Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Redback View Post
    What about the new Challenger diesel, coil springs all round based on the Triton chassis.

    From all acounts a good car.

    Baz.
    We've driven a few as were looking at getting another vehicle for Emma (wife).

    Great to drive, responsive and tow well.

    With the dogs though we decided on GLX-R Triton with all the fruit and diff lock.

    Tows our 2300kg Cat like it's not there.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    450
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by VladTepes View Post
    Well you can expect that but compare the ground clearance between the two and you may come to a different conclusion.

    Besides I didn;t think Paj's had a factory rear diff lock (unless its an option in which case you are comparing apples with oranges)
    Ground clearance isn't the be all and end all though. If it was, a D1 would be better offroad than a D4.

    Factory difflock is an option on most Mitsubishi's. And at around $600 is very affordable. Apples with oranges - not really. Both are off the factory floor.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Brisbane West
    Posts
    7,373
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by TuffRR View Post
    Ground clearance isn't the be all and end all though. If it was, a D1 would be better offroad than a D4.

    Factory difflock is an option on most Mitsubishi's. And at around $600 is very affordable. Apples with oranges - not really. Both are off the factory floor.
    Yep the locker is an option, but it works in so that when you engage it, it turns of the traction control.....so for my money it would be say VRX then aftermarket air locker to have the best of all worlds.

    For beach work the Paj with its big tyres as standard and the torque of the 3.2 TD would be hard to beat, but for trails the Disco is ahead in comfort and ability. There have been plenty of comparos between the Paj and Playdough off road and the Playdough just (just) edges ahead with that live rear axle. In reality though its very close it seems and for my money it would be Pajero every time over the toyota especially for towing heavy.

    Cheers

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!