To Mark Stokes,
Please do yourself and some of your sponsors the courtesy of at least viewing their published data and studies before sprouting off about banning 4x4's. NRMA has a published study on the rearward visibility of cars and 4x4's, perhaps you might deign to look it ? Yes 4x4's should be fittied with rearward sensors (but then again audi's are?) as should many other vehicles.
You have picked 12 vehicle related fatalities out of over 3500 in the last 10 years in victoria alone, without looking at or ignoring by choice, the real picture. That picture is that 4x4s and their passengers are invloved in LESS accidents and have a LOWER injury rate than those in other vehicles.
The other massive flaw in your attempt at media grabbing is the insurance rates. Go onto a online web site say NRMA and price the cost of insuring a $63,000 prado to an equvilent HSV at $63,000(almost $500 extra) BMW at $65,000($650 extra) or a 2.0 petrol Audi A4 is still 350 extra at the same value. To spell it out for you 4x4 owners are invloved in far less 2+vehicle accidents where they are at fault and the damage to the vehicle and the occupants inside is lower so it is cheaper to insure them. Insurance companies are out to make a profit and that is reflected in the costs of insuring each vehicle so the more at fault and easily damaged(/ stolen/car-jacked) a car is the more it will cost to insure. Go to a few of the major insurers and try to get a policy on a WRX STi it will either be extremely expensive or rejected totally depending upon year.
In the future please make a better considered statement than the shock jock style less than half a percent(LOWER THAN 0.5%) of the deaths on our road's in the last 10 years where caused by 4x4's rant!
Bookmarks