Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 56

Thread: RAN gets a new ship.....

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    South West WA
    Posts
    214
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by THE BOOGER View Post
    all we need now is the VSTOL f35 to go with the canberra class
    Due to cost blowouts the USA been broke etc etc its unlikely the VSTOL F35 will ever see the light of day in a production format.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    RIVERLAND, SOUTH AUSTRALIA
    Posts
    6,740
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    Am fascinated about listing "London" as the home port. Have never seen that on a naval ship before.

    What will it be renamed?

    HMAS Botany Bay?
    HMAS Woolloomooloo Bay?
    HMAS Port Philip Bay?
    why not HMAS LARGS BAY ??(after the FORT LARGS military base and cannons etc in SA built to protect us from those pesky Russians!)

    I believe its bad luck to rename a ship..
    (REMLR 235/MVCA 9) 80" -'49.(RUST), -'50 & '52. (53-parts) 88" -57 s1, -'63 -s2a -GS x 2-"Horrie"-112-769, "Vet"-112-429(-Vietnam-PRE 1ATF '65) ('66, s2a-as UN CIVPOL), Hans '73- s3 109" '56 s1 x2 77- s3 van (gone)& '12- 110

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    495
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    Garry

    I'm not sure that is true, if you consider the recent scuttling of HMAS Adelaide II, she only lasted in commission for 28 years and on comparitive calculations the Aussie built alternative to HMAS Manoora would only have about 10 years of their commission life left.

    Diana
    CANBERRA and ADELAIDE are at the bottom due to money not age or condition. Their sacrifice (chosen as they were the two oldest in class) freed up money that paid for the 'upgrade' of the remainder. I served in both reasonably late in their lives and they were both fine ships capable of many more years at sea.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    East-South-East Girt-By-Sea
    Posts
    17,665
    Total Downloaded
    1.20 MB
    Quote Originally Posted by jc109 View Post
    CANBERRA and ADELAIDE are at the bottom <snip>
    Is it true that the US built ANZAC frigates like Adelaide were not as comfortable for crew than the Aussie built ones? I'm talking about the ability to generate water for showers etc. Or was that the US built DDGs?

    You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    495
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Lotz-A-Landies View Post
    Is it true that the US built ANZAC frigates like Adelaide were not as comfortable for crew than the Aussie built ones? I'm talking about the ability to generate water for showers etc. Or was that the US built DDGs?
    The DDGs were old technology and were pretty rudimentary. I would have loved to serve in one but never got the chance. FFGs aren't ANZAC Class (FFH), but OLIVER HAZARD PERRY (Australianised to ADELAIDE) Class, so totally different ships. They're a much older design and yes the creature comforts are lacking compared to ANZACs. To my mind however they're a real warship whereas the ANZACs are a grey cruise ship. And FFGs drive like sports cars, and certainly look the goods. I am a little biased though. The young guys now seem more interested in having internet and Playstation than I ever could have been. They may have longer showers but I never went without until I transferred to submarines, but that's a whole 'nother story.

    It's just occurred to me that you may have meant the original US-built FFGs v the later Aust-built versions. In short, no. It's never come up in my time in the RAN and I know a lot of people who've served in both. In fact, it's generally considered that the Aust-built ones were far inferior apart from age and associated condition. We need to face facts. Their ship building industry is a going concern and has been for a very long time. We can't do it better than them no matter how parochial you want to get. The minute we tweak and 'improve' we end up wrecking an otherwise good thing. It's 'jobs for the boys', not 'let's get the best tool for the job at the best price and while we're at it let's make it easily integrated and let's get what the end user needs and the one that saves lives'. Nah, let's pick up some votes in some marginal seats instead.

    Sorry, this was about showers wasn't it...

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    QLD
    Posts
    495
    Total Downloaded
    0
    FWIW I think ex-RFA Largs Bay is a good pick-up, and I concur with earlier comments re the MAN/KAN debacle.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    brighton, brisbane
    Posts
    33,853
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by jc109 View Post
    The DDGs were old technology and were pretty rudimentary. .
    The DDG's may seem that way to you, but for someone coming from a Daring [Vampire] to one [Perth], they were a revelation. The accommodation was luxurious in comparison, you actually had lockers big enough to fit your kit in, there was no trouble with water, and , compared to Vampire, the engineering spaces were state of the art.They were our first dedicated missile destroyers, and the 5" gunnery system was spot on [when they worked], as we demonstrated in Vietnam.All three served in Vietnam [along with Vendetta], I had the pleasure of serving on Perth in that conflict, and indeed served on all three DDG's, going to England for the Queens Silver Jubilee on Brisbane, a definite highlight, I still have a copy of the Queens signal to " splice the mainbrace", and believe me, we did! Bob
    I’m pretty sure the dinosaurs died out when they stopped gathering food and started having meetings to discuss gathering food

    A bookshop is one of the only pieces of evidence we have that people are still thinking

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Gold coast
    Posts
    3,130
    Total Downloaded
    0
    I read its going to be......

    HMAS "MILNE BAY"

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Caboolture.Qld
    Posts
    2,382
    Total Downloaded
    0
    All this is extremely interesting but ........Can you fish off it?

  10. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    RIVERLAND, SOUTH AUSTRALIA
    Posts
    6,740
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by RobHay View Post
    All this is extremely interesting but ........Can you fish off it?
    no, but the way our Govt is going... in about 10 years you may be able to fish OVER it!!!!
    (REMLR 235/MVCA 9) 80" -'49.(RUST), -'50 & '52. (53-parts) 88" -57 s1, -'63 -s2a -GS x 2-"Horrie"-112-769, "Vet"-112-429(-Vietnam-PRE 1ATF '65) ('66, s2a-as UN CIVPOL), Hans '73- s3 109" '56 s1 x2 77- s3 van (gone)& '12- 110

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!