Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Thread: So, the Deefer (as we know it) is finally going

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    in the wild New England, NSW
    Posts
    4,918
    Total Downloaded
    0

    So, the Deefer (as we know it) is finally going

    an article about the future of the deefer

    extract from the article (link below) ...

    "we’re making sure that whatever we produce in the future is not going to dilute what Defender really stands for. So it needs to be authentic. If someone’s going to get in the car they’re going to want to get in the car and so stuff with it and say ‘I don’t want it to break, I want it to go places that other things won’t take me to"

    .. but what about tradition - doesn't it matter anymore ?

    ... and it will probably have a crumple zone as well !



    Defender to get re-born | Land Rover

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Toowoomba, Queensland
    Posts
    1,863
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Tradition matters - I think this is the nearest anyone within Land Rover has come to saying that they intend to produce the commerical/recreational crossover that the Defender is and needs to be. And they are clearly aware that 60+ years of the same profile can't be ignored - but nor do they want to produce a vehicle that looks good but isn't a truly functional go-anywhere, do-anything vehicle.

    I'm sure the quote has a type: "... get in the car and DO stuff with it ..." makes more sense.

    In a few short years they won't be able to sell the current Defender anywhere BUT India and China, and even there they couldn't compete with the knockoffs (Iveco Massif and Morattab Pazhan). They HAVE to start again with a clean slate: the first ground-up redesign since 1948. Provided they deliver what they say in this interview, we'll all be happy.
    Steve

    2003 Discovery 2a
    In better care:
    1992 Defender
    1963 Series IIa Ambulance
    1977 Series III Ex-Army
    1988 County V8
    1981 V8 Series 3 "Stage 1"
    REMLR No. 215

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    wetherill park
    Posts
    2,600
    Total Downloaded
    0
    The media release sounds good but lets see what they come up with

    "But while the mechanicals are set for a major overhaul the design is expected to remain close to the original. Trying to replace the famous shape has reportedly got the design team at Land Rover inspired"

    hope they dont become to inspired

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Melb. Vic.
    Posts
    6,045
    Total Downloaded
    0
    This comment is a worry

    "I don’t think it needs to be any better off-road,”

    Translation

    It wont be as good off road.

    Oh well, wait and see, I imagine the regulations will require all sort of safety improvements , Airbags etc.
    They will frig with the suspension too - no more solid axles..


    Mine already has a crumple zone ........the car in front of me.
    (Note to self - no head ons with other Defenders)

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ringwood, Vic
    Posts
    2,127
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Just reading this thread and I'm reminded of all the "Doom and Gloom" that surrounded the early technology interventions which have gone into almost every 4wd over the last 20 years or so. Things like Intercooled Turbo's, brakes that work, the extra power of common rail injection systems, better rollover protection and let's not forget comfort.
    The fact is that like it or not, the vehicles we now have are proving more reliable than ever and more importantly, they are immensely safer.
    The old chestnut of being able to fix it on the side of the road with a couple of spanners and a screwdriver are long gone. But vehicles simply don't break down like they used to either (unless you have a P38).
    Will they keep solid axles.... maybe, maybe not but if you look at the off-road abilities of a fully independent D3 or D4 maybe that's not so bad afterall.
    Eventually safety regs will catch up with cars like the Defender as they have already with the 76 series LC which came out without ABS or Airbags only 3 or 4 years ago.
    No one will MAKE you buy a new vehicle, you can keep fixing what you have but don't be totally negative to change until you see what those changes are and how they affect the performance comfort and safety.
    D4 SDV6, a blank canvas

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    [QUOTE=Sleepy;1529824]This comment is a worry

    "I don’t think it needs to be any better off-road,”

    Translation

    It wont be as good off road.

    Oh well, wait and see, I imagine the regulations will require all sort of safety improvements , Airbags etc.
    They will frig with the suspension too - no more solid axles..


    Owning both independant and live axle Land Rovers the old live axle is best is nothing but rubbish,my I/S L322 will go anywhere my live axle LR's will go. Pat

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Safety Bay
    Posts
    8,041
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by wardy1 View Post
    Just reading this thread and I'm reminded of all the "Doom and Gloom" that surrounded the early technology interventions which have gone into almost every 4wd over the last 20 years or so. Things like Intercooled Turbo's, brakes that work, the extra power of common rail injection systems, better rollover protection and let's not forget comfort.
    The fact is that like it or not, the vehicles we now have are proving more reliable than ever and more importantly, they are immensely safer.
    The old chestnut of being able to fix it on the side of the road with a couple of spanners and a screwdriver are long gone. But vehicles simply don't break down like they used to either (unless you have a P38).
    Will they keep solid axles.... maybe, maybe not but if you look at the off-road abilities of a fully independent D3 or D4 maybe that's not so bad afterall.
    Eventually safety regs will catch up with cars like the Defender as they have already with the 76 series LC which came out without ABS or Airbags only 3 or 4 years ago.
    No one will MAKE you buy a new vehicle, you can keep fixing what you have but don't be totally negative to change until you see what those changes are and how they affect the performance comfort and safety.
    I remember tojo drivers telling me that coils are no good,you don't need a V8,constant 4wd is too complicated,A/C is for yuppy's,auto's are no good because the starter will fail in the bush blah blah.Same for the I/S,a D3-4 will beat any live axle 4wd offroad and on straight of the showroom floor. Pat

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Mudgee-ish
    Posts
    946
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PAT303 View Post
    .Same for the I/S,a D3-4 will beat any live axle 4wd offroad and on straight of the showroom floor. Pat
    I believe I was abducted by aliens and probed.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Melb. Vic.
    Posts
    6,045
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by wardy1 View Post
    Just reading this thread and I'm reminded of all the "Doom and Gloom" that surrounded the early technology interventions which have gone into almost every 4wd over the last 20 years or so. Things like Intercooled Turbo's, brakes that work, the extra power of common rail injection systems, better rollover protection and let's not forget comfort.
    The fact is that like it or not, the vehicles we now have are proving more reliable than ever and more importantly, they are immensely safer.
    The old chestnut of being able to fix it on the side of the road with a couple of spanners and a screwdriver are long gone. But vehicles simply don't break down like they used to either (unless you have a P38).
    Will they keep solid axles.... maybe, maybe not but if you look at the off-road abilities of a fully independent D3 or D4 maybe that's not so bad afterall.
    Eventually safety regs will catch up with cars like the Defender as they have already with the 76 series LC which came out without ABS or Airbags only 3 or 4 years ago.
    No one will MAKE you buy a new vehicle, you can keep fixing what you have but don't be totally negative to change until you see what those changes are and how they affect the performance comfort and safety.
    Yes, fair enough Wardy.

    Not sure there is too much "totally negative" comments. Just regret at the passing of a fine vehicle, that is not all that far removed from its 1959 origins.
    I dont think we were suggesting we would or wouldnt buy one. I may, ....geez I even test drove a FJ cruiser.....ok I was having a bad day.

    What I love most about my Defender is ........it makes me smile - Every time I drive it. I just hope they retain this character and it doesnt get lost in a sea of Nisabitshiotas, with more gizmos than charm.

    Head vs. Heart ?




    And that old "chestnut" about comfort is a furphy - I love the driving position and seats in my Defender and prefer it for long trips to the Disco.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Melb. Vic.
    Posts
    6,045
    Total Downloaded
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PAT303 View Post
    I remember tojo drivers telling me that coils are no good,you don't need a V8,constant 4wd is too complicated,A/C is for yuppy's,auto's are no good because the starter will fail in the bush blah blah.Same for the I/S,a D3-4 will beat any live axle 4wd offroad and on straight of the showroom floor. Pat
    You seem to be wanting an arguement. Which was not why I posted. But in the spirit of a friendly aulro debate I will take the side of the negative.

    I recall being in the Fitzroy club rooms of the fairly new Toyota Landcruiser Club of Victoria ...circa 1973 when we were shown (slide show) the "new" range rover. A hush came across the audience as we realised these coil sprung, disc braked, v8's were going to eat out FJ40's for breakfast.(And they did!) Yes there were many envious and interested tojo drivers there. No doom and gloom but just wanting Toyota to match this vehicle (it took another 18 years for an allwheel coil spring cruiser.)

    Early auto's were no good . Engine breaking used to be important.

    Competition drivers use solid axles.....

    I drive a 101 now , so aircon is for you softies...

    Dont get me wrong I would love Rangie, Disco even the FL2 looks nice. Great engineering, very safe, comfy and capable.(They havent sold me on the evoque yet!.....even a 2wd version)
    A fierce RRS would also look great in my drive. All those buttons with little cactus symbols and ...



    .....but I havent got 60 plus grand so I may as well stop now.





    And I will still carry a screw driver - just in case.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Search AULRO.com ONLY!
Search All the Web!