Might be the only way to keep a manufacturing sector going in non 3rd world country, pay for peoples jobs, keep them working or pay them social security and reap the social problems.
I Have thought long and hard over posting this for a while
Holden,s CEO wants the Australian tax payer to prop them up with 250 mil $
3 years ago during the GFC with Gm in the US going belly up then being saved by the Us taxpayer the Australian goverment gave the car companys in Australia millions of dollars ,
Now during this cash hand out by the goverment Holden layed off approx 300 people with packages ig $$$$ payed by who the tax payer of course
Just this week they layed another 43 off at the engine plant in melb
Now the way i see things is Holden are not going to be here too much longer as there is no rear wheel drive dunnydore after 2016![]()
The way these multinational companys are going is a global platformwhich will be built in a third world country lower costs , Gm in the US dont care too much for oz lets face it we only sell 100.000 dunnydores a year they sell that many in a month in the US
![]()
Now i know we all need jobs but should we be proping up a multinational company that as soon as us dumb skippys hand over our hard earned cash are going to drop us like a hot spud![]()
Might be the only way to keep a manufacturing sector going in non 3rd world country, pay for peoples jobs, keep them working or pay them social security and reap the social problems.
Have to agree with Bill here.
Either we pay to keep a manufacturing sector or we pay the dole untill we run out of things to dig out of the ground and then we turn into Ethiopia.
Maybe that is a little dramatic, but there are a lot of other jobs associated with an automotive plant, component manufacturers etc.
You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.
True but do you realise how much your Australian car is un Australian 3 years ago 70% of your Ve dunnydore was imported parts(yes china) and im guessing that figure has grown and and will keep growing till all that is left is a assembled car from imported parts but Australian made
Aso this is a company that makes a profit all they are doing is holding Australia to ransom for what 3000 jobs !
If Holden came out with something remotely interesting they might sell more units.
Rangieman,
I started working with %Health 10 years ago.
Back when I started I read a statistic that 80% (yes 80%) of staff employed were NON clinical. It made sense why we had so many memos, committees and policy documents pouring up from Brisbane.
At first it made me really angry - and then I realised it is in essence an amazingly efficient 'Work for the Dole Scheme'.
Most of those jobs are jobs that are not real jobs BUT someone is doing them, probably has pride in them, feeding their families and paying taxes with the money from them.
Australia by its very disparate population size vs physical size can never really be capitalist. It can have capitalist ideology at every level, BUT white collar welfare will remain to be a part of our landscape for a long time yet. I think we need to think about this and realise that this is not really such a bad thing! Pure Capitalism is not the Australian way.
Steve
'95 130 dual cab fender (gone to a better universe)
'10 130 dual cab fender (getting to know it's neurons)
Look I am a Holden man through and through, but the tax payer can not go on subsidising an industry to that extent. AFAIK Holden have been posting a profit so why should they get handouts.
Ford the same.
I dont think subsidising is the answer. It is rife in the US so they expect it here, but how long can taxpayers go on doing this.
The quote about 100,000 Commodores is fine, the Falcon is way below that and due to corporate greed we will see the end of both Marques and that is sad.
A good start maybe for the govt to slash duties on parts brought in to create these vehicles and drop the luxury tax and GST on locally built and designed vehicles.
We missed the boat completely in the 60's, Holden or Ford should have created a decent 4x4 as that is were the big market is in industry.
If we had our own steel smelters and componentry manufacturers in Australia then maybe it could be sustainable.
And maybe if all govt departments and major fleets supported the local industry by buying Commodores and Falcons as their sedan fleet, this could change.
We are heading to the point of having no manufacturing base at all in Australia in the next 20 years to gross negligence and no foresight by successive governments.
2011 Discovery 4 TDV6
2009 DRZ400E Suzuki
1956 & 1961 P4 Rover (project)
1976 SS Torana (project - all cash donations or parts accepted)
2003 WK Holden Statesman
Departed
2000 Defender Extreme: Shrek (but only to son)
84 RR (Gone) 97 Tdi Disco (Gone)
98 Ducati 900SS Gone & Missed
Facta Non Verba
Holden has never been an Australian car, right from the first 48/215 it was a wholly owned GM subsidiary, the design was a stillborn post-war US model that never went into production, the engine and transmission came out of the US, basically only the body building was Australian and that is what Holden always were, motor body builders fitting their production onto Chevrolet rolling chassis.
It doesnt matter who owns the company, or the fact that some components come from elsewhere, as long as we keep some of the production and assembly here, to retain some heavy manufacturing and its associated skills base.
You won't find me on: faceplant; Scipe; Infragam; LumpedIn; ShapCnat or Twitting. I'm just not that interesting.
It is fairly simple. Labour and legislative imposed (OH&S/WH&S environmental compliance at plant) costs in Australia are higher than in the 3rd world. Even if a company is making a profit while operating manufacturing factories in Australia, they will make bigger profits by relocating to the 3rd world. If you drop tariffs to lower the costs of importing components it is no different than providing Holden/Ford a hand out as its another form of taking money the Gov would have got and keeping it the vehicle manufacturers pockets. Not sure that there is that much of a tariff that applies to the import of parts for car manufacturing (and there could be other effects by doing that any way).
Once we protected our manufacturing industry by applying tariffs to the products that were imported and competed with the locally produced. World trade agreements have lowered the tariff walls and as a result prices have gone down but there have been job losses as the industry has relocated, footwear, garment/clothing and now it looks like automotive manufacturing. We have to pay for our standard of living somehow, while there are countries that have people with lower standards of living and lower labour costs we will struggle to maintain the status quo without some very creative policy settings.
Ford and Holden could have been at the forfront of vehicle manufacturing by making vehicles to suit the market that is still rife today,instead they made vehicles nobody wants for a market that doesn't exist and now they want us to pay them for it. Pat
| Search AULRO.com ONLY! |
Search All the Web! |
|---|
|
|
|
Bookmarks